Michael Green's great defense of CD

juandelacruz's picture

The following is a well written defense of controlled demolition and thoughts on CD's critics by Michael Green at Opednews.

I applaud his article with some caveats. He endorses Sibel Edmonds and Jim Hoffman among others. I think he needs to read up more on those two fellow's shortcomings but otherwise his work is a masterpiece in my opinion.

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Pardon-Our-Dust-or-Why-t-by-Michael-Gre...

There is spirited debate in the comments section.

Attention CD bashers and skeptics, you loose again.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
juandelacruz's picture

Page 3 goes beyond CD

I will be brief here from necessity. If the Towers and Building 7 were destroyed by controlled demolition, then these vastly complicated acts were coordinated through the security apparatus of the World Trade Center in conjunction with high-ranking members of the U.S. military, especially the Air Force, whose cooperation was required to assure that the commercial airplanes hit their targets, and with the media whose job it was to disseminate the fiction of Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda from the mouths of the intelligence agencies that coordinated this grand act of political theater. The cover-up was managed by control of the crime scene and subsequent "investigations", destruction of the evidence, and was anticipated through a variety of legislation and executive orders that are well known to 911 researchers. The USG, in cooperation with elements of private industry and finance capital, brought us 911. The 911 Commission, like the Warren Commission before it, remains a cruel hoax to euthanize critical public thinking. Not all of the actors who served the cover-up were aware of their roles, but they were ultimately set into motion by those who were.

Behind, and parallel to, the visible and overt political power structure lies the fundamental source of political power and action in the United States. It is known well only to those who participate regularly in it, and to a small number of persons, who for one reason or another have stumbled into it, have refused to look aside, and have pursued it to its bottom. I don't wish to dramatize the "invisible government" but these are the persons who control domestic covert action to effect profound changes in political power and political climate in extra-legal ways and who also own and control much of Congress. The motivation and sense of entitlement to do so is an old story, and keeping within the bounds of U.S. history there is John Jay, who would become the first Chief Justice of the United States, who said in arguing against popular suffrage, ''The people who own the country ought to govern it.'' Covert action is one amongst many means that allow those who own this country to rule it without ostensibly violating the spirit of democracy.
These persons are united in keeping their deeds secret from the vast number of Americans even when they strongly disagree amongst themselves about the wisdom of a particular covert action like 911. Providing the details for this political perspective would take us too far afield, but it is this perspective that is entailed by the thermitic dust in the World Trade Center, one that would mobilize the American people could they only grasp it and comes to terms with it. That is what people like Steven Jones, Niels Harrit, Jim Hoffman, Kevin Ryan, David Ray Griffin, Richard Gage & friends are trying to promulgate, and people like Dr. Moffett are trying to suppress.

The "Thermitic Dust" paper is a scientific paper produced by scientists using their expertise to illuminate the mechanism of 911 as a covert operation. It presents an extraordinary piece of 911 evidence that allows no wiggle room, that cannot be explained away in any other fashion. Underscoring the evidentiary significance of the thermitic dust does nothing to scant the larger geopolitical picture nor the abundance of non-scientific evidence that others have laboriously, and often very courageously, assembled. As Michael Ruppert emphasized, the world is running out of irreplaceable oil. Others have noted that United States capitalism has been in a long arc of decline since the Vietnam war, and has declined more rapidly in the wake of decisions to deindustrialize and to allow "finance capital" -- parasitic practices that produce fictitious profits at the expense of the real economy -- to become an ever greater part of the U.S. economy.

The ruling class of the United States responded to threats to the U.S. dollar and U.S. global hegemony by generating a pretext for war in the Middle East in an attempt to shore up both the dollar and the hegemony by obtaining a stranglehold on the oil in that area that constitutes roughly 60% of the world's known reserves. To the rulers of the United States, the sacrifice of 3,000 civilians means nothing more than a form of involuntary conscription that they feel fully entitled to impose. The "endless war on terror" was a pronouncement by the neocons and their allies of their confidence that military might sufficed to intervene against "terrorism" wherever they felt seizure of scarce resources and geopolitical gain were to be found. The need to defend ourselves against an existential enemy of the rulers' own creation served as the pretext to build a domestic police state for use against its own citizens should they mobilize against the rulers' preferred allocation of resources when oil and other scarcities could no longer be profitably found to preserve the standard of living to which the people of the United States, and the advanced western democracies generally, had become accustomed.

The importance of the thermitic dust is complementary to all the other evidence assembled by others. A short non-exhaustive list of such evidence includes 1) the world-wide insider puts that used foreknowledge of 911 to make investments to rake in small fortunes; 2) the many ignored and suppressed warnings derailed from the top of the USG intelligence chain of command; 3) the well-planned and well-concealed War Games running simultaneously with the 911 operation to prevent NORAD from intercepting the airliners and -- only if necessary -- to provide an excuse why no interception occurred; 4) Dick Cheney's "the order still stands" command not to shoot down the airliner that was approaching the Pentagon, that was suppressed by the 911 Commission; 5) the stories of the brave whistleblowers, including Coleen Rowley, Indira Singh, Robert Wright, and Sibel Edmonds all of whom have been sidelined and marginalized into political insignificance; 6) the background of Mohammed Atta & friends (from Daniel Hopsicker) that reveals them as well trained and protected USG intelligence operatives, not Islamic terrorists; 7) the cover-up conspiracy too vast even to adumbrate.

I should say in closing that many if not most of even the very good 911 researchers do not understand the nature of this power nor the forces of psychological resistance to reaching an understanding of it. For example, David Ray Griffin has urged Congress to investigate 911 anew in light of this dramatic evidence, in my view apparently having failed to learn the palpable lesson from his own book, The 911 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, i.e., that key members Congress were actively complicit in the cover-up and that the others knew their proper role to be to stand aside in mute silence. Similarly, in his Danish TV interview, Niels Harrit said that now that this paper has revealed not merely the smoking gun, but the "loaded gun," i.e., the unignited thermite, that he expects the authorities to start an investigation and bring the criminals to justice.

I have no such expectations. Between the hard facts of the matter and organized political actions stand both the self-deceived guardians of the psychological status quo and the deliberate agents of the invisible government. Would that the truth were simple, plain, and self-evident. Instead, we face the problem articulated by my friend Vincent Salandria, the father of the first generation of the John F. Kennedy researchers, in a 1971 address. Referring to the JFK assassination, Salandria argued that when a major covert action takes place, the truth about it is revealed:

...at differing levels of certainty to diverse people and at different times. In this way, they [the plotters] could avert a concerted counter thrust to their illegitimate seizure of power. Democratic forces could not unite against the new illegitimate governmental apparatus because of timing. The insights of what had occurred dawned in the minds of the decent citizens at different times and with different degrees of clarity. (Vincent Salandria, False Mystery, p. 103)

Salandria believes that often in the Kennedy case, "The new rulers carefully and selectively orchestrated revelations of their bloody work, so as to gain therefrom the deference to which they felt they were entitled by their ascendancy to absolute power." For 911, a possible example of an orchestrated revelation would be the NASA thermal survey showing ground temperatures days and weeks after 911 that were inconsistent with a normal hydrocarbon fire, boasting of their sins rather than confessing them. I don't waste much time wondering whether there was such intent behind the NASA survey, or whether the bureaucracy unwittingly produced this early revelatory finding. The NASA survey failed to produce a collective epiphany because of how slowly information spreads, how ill-equipped most people are to use it, and because even those best equipped to understand it also know the vagaries of research and look for further evidence to confirm or disconfirm it, as have the authors of "Active Thermitic Material." Sly boast or bureacratic release, the effect is the same.

Only now, the facts that matter politically are in, and if I expect the mainstream media to do everything in its power to ignore and distort the findings of unignited thermitic material in the WTC dust – and I do – I was still a little surprised to find the Managing Editor of OPEDNEWS doing the same thing. Perhaps I should not have been.

http://www.opednews.com/articles/3/Pardon-Our-Dust-or-Why-t-by-Michael-Green-090417-989.html

gretavo's picture

here's my two grains of salt worth...

Green seems to be of the "blame America First" crowd. There is in my opinion an undeniable Israeli role to be discovered when all is said and done, and this may explain why people like Jim Hoffman dismiss the Pentagon angle.
If indeed a link is found between 9/11 and Israel, then the fact that the Pentagon was struck would constitue an act of war.

On the other hand, it may not be so much about Israel and an act of war than about the simple fact that AA77 more than anything disproves the hijackings myth and that the perps are counting on being able to explain controlled demolition as an al Qaeda act and if need be, "admit" that UA93 was shot down.

If we follow fake truthers like Jim Hoffman and say that no, there is no problem with the "AA77 was hijacked and slammed into the Pentagon" story, then we are back to LIHOP with bombs in the building. And as we all know, "bin Laden put a bomb in the building in 1993" so really we're just back to LIHOP. And as we also all know, the line between LIHOP and incompetence is extremely blurry if indeed a line can be discerned at all.

juandelacruz's picture

While I admire Green for his

While I admire Green for his article I certainly don't hold all his views to be correct. But I do think his errors are honest in contrast to someone like Jon Gold who seems to be deliberately disseminating disinfo.

I think Green is very good on the CD science part but less studied on the rest of the conspiracy which includes Israel, Pentagon, disinfo, etc.

What I do appreciate is that among the truthers who are scientifically trained, he goes on record with his take on the implications of a controlled demolition - that the government, at least parts of it, and the media was involved in the execution and coverup. He goes on to say that Congress is not to be trusted to investigate the matter.

I just found it refreshing that someone could elucidate on CD with his background and rigor then go on to a part of the conspiracy that few other scientists have dared. I hope he stumbles onto WTCDemolition.com and see how far we have come connecting the dots.

Striking the WTC towers with airplanes and detonating demo charges in them is enough to constitute an act of war. Hitting the Pentagon would not have been necessary to determine that. Since we know that Israeli agents had prior knowledge, there is no other conclusion an act of war was waged on the US. The cover up, presided upon by top officials constitutes treason at the very least.

gretavo's picture

I can respect your point of view

but I'm very tired of having to be suspicious of people who say all the right things about one part of the problem and then fall flat on the rest. this is a problem because there is every reason to believe that we are being appeased on some points so as to lend our support to something that will later be twisted into something unrecognizable which we will not support and never would have supported--a bait and switch in other words. and whether it is intentional or not, people in the truth movement ignoring this problem is very dangerous because there will come a time when we will need to wrest all influence away from the fakes before they can permanently damage the quest for the *real* truth...