Harvard Islamic Chaplain’s E-mail Sparks Controversy

It is a form of discrimination to police only the religious thinking of Muslims.

When Jews (see http://eaazi.blogspot.com/2008/03/harvard-jews-... ) are doing a lot if not most of the Islamophobic incitement, pointing out the similarities of contemporary and traditional Islamic and Jewish thought is a reasonable technique to identify the vacuousness of the attack on Taha Abdul-Basser and to highlight Jewish Zionist racism and hypocrisy at Harvard.

This controversy over Sharia penalties for apostacy looks like yet another Jewish Zionist effort to marginalize Muslims as incapable of taking part in civilized discourse and to demonize Islam as fundamentally different from Judeo-Christianity and intrinsically incompatible with American values even though Islam, Judaism, and Christianity as Abrahamic religions simply are not very different once we remove the Jewish Zionist Islamophobic propaganda from the discussion.

The Harvard Community has to take a long hard look at Jewish racist faculty,staff, and directors of Harvard University.

Alan Dershowitz, Ruth Wisse and many others long ago crossed the boundaries of moral turpitude, scholarly incompetence, or scholarly malfeasance that should have lead to dismissal despite tenure.

In any case, there is a serious misunderstanding of the nature of religious freedom at Harvard university. Religious leaders do not have to meet progressive Western liberal standards in order to act as chaplains or to take part in official Harvard Student organizations.

Many Christian clergy preach that anyone not believing in Christ will go to Hell. It is a rather offensive idea to non-Christians.

Rabbi Zarchi of the Chabad House could explain to you that the mere glance of a non-Jew can render certain types of wine ritually unclean.

He could probably also explain that Lubovitchers believe that non-Jews do not have fully human souls.

Several on campus religious groups have all sorts of racist ideas in their theology, but Harvard does not police creeds.

On the other hand Birthright Israel, which is a concrete expression of the racist Zionist belief that Jews have the right to plunder and murder non-Jews with impunity and which is sponsored by Hillel, is more than sufficient grounds to strip Hillel of any Harvard affiliation because it is form of open discrimination that potentially jeopardizes the status of Harvard University as an organization that can receive tax deductible contributions under IRS 501(c)(3) regulations.

Yet to tell the truth the Islamophobic incitement and other offensive Harvard Jewish behavior look like a red herring to distract from serious financial malfeasance.

As I point out in http://eaazi.blogspot.com/2009/04/chop-shop-eco... , corrupt Jewish social networking is pervasive in the finance industry, and this sort of corruption has thanks to Larry Summers and Bob Rubin done immense harm to Harvard. See http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2009/04... .

The Harvard community has to take a long hard look at the negative role that Jews at Harvard are playing at the University because of Jewish support for Zionist genocidalism, Jewish extremist racism, and Jewish conspiracy that is harming the university financially and academically.

http://eaazi.blogspot.com/2008/12/gladwell-supp...

BTW, it is probably worthwhile to investigate why El-Erian resigned the Harvard Management Corporation. Did he begin to suspect he was being set up as the fall guy?

As for the origins of Arab Jihadism, here is the critical paragraph from http://eaazi.blogspot.com/2009/03/long-version-....

"Because Arab Jihadis had no interest in overthrowing 'Muslim' governments and because there was considerable overlap of their program with that of the US government and even of the Neocons, they worked in an essentially frictionless environment of International Islamic Organizations mostly headquartered In Hijaz while they traveled effortlessly throughout the world from Peshawar to Hijaz, and thence to the USA (especially Boston). While the US and Saudi governments mostly ignored them, the Afghan Mujahidin were at best uninterested in Arab jihadi help and generally considered Azzam's group to be more trouble than it was worth."
----------------------------------
The US and the Saudis supported the Mujahidin and were barely aware of the Arab jihadis until Jihadi organizations began to turn their attention to the USA.

The Pakistani Taliban is a recent development while the Afghanistani Taliban was supported by the Pakistani government and not by the USA or Saudi Arabia.