DRG confronted

as well as, in the case of 9/11, a highly controversial, and unfortunately, dangerous truth.

I just had a weekend-long visit and conversation on this whole subject being discussed here, so eloquently and excellently in this thread, with an old and dear colleague whom I have not seen since 2001. Over dinner on Friday night, he sheepishly and cautiously brought up the subject of alternative research into the events of 9/11. I then went on info-auto-pilot and just introduced what I thought was the most likely means-motive-and-opportunity scenarios for the 9/11 events, based on research that I have looked into. Turns out, to my complete surprise, that his cousin is this “big, 9/11 truth movement guy,” someone named Richard Gage. It was one of those weird, six degrees of separation moments. Yes, it’s a very small and weird world, fer sure. Needless to say, he and his wife and I talked from then on, all weekend long, about 9/11, false flag terror, the history of Zionism and Israel, Zionist terror organizations and operations, the history of Holocaust revisionist history and World War II, the Walt and Mearsheimer tome, Paul Findley, Israel Shahak, etc, etc.

This experience definitively brought home to me the fact that there is an entire, well-informed, “underground” network of people out there who pretty much know and rationally understand the hardcore and delicate truths concerning the nature of these various, connected “taboo” subject matters.

Gretavo, you are a wise and good man:

“None of us will or should ever achieve the status of unquestionable authority, including DRG. If indeed it turns out to be the case that he is yet another gatekeeper so be it! He won't succeed at keeping us penned in anymore than any other gatekeeper has. Remember that gatekeepers serve a very useful function in the pursuit of truth--they're usually a good indicator of where to look next!” [emphasis mine]

This, of course, relates completely to the Super Brilliant Idea of passing legislation against all revisionist research into the history of THE SUPER SACRED (and one and only) Holocaust™, backed up by the “teeth” of real jail time, loss of career, and even loss of family and friends. To the perceptive eye, such legislation blatantly declares that “there is a truth here which must be hidden at all costs, for if exposed, it would bring down one of the greatest con games of the 20th century – the employment of “the Jewish people” as “human shields” and PR-useful, persecuted cannon fodder for the ultimate advancement of the elitist, global dominion ambitions of the minority Zionist leadership configuration. The “people” always take the brunt of the persecution for the actions launched by the elite leadership, who always seem to forever remain untouched under all circumstances. Did Hitler round up any member of the Rothschild family? Not that I know of.

On the position apparently taken by Professor Griffin (DRG) and other highly public figures regarding Israel and 9/11, I would just like to point out that this subject matter of 9/11 is just a tad bit more dangerous than, say, environmentally taking on the coal mining industry.

Imagine, if you will, that a majority of the American and Western public—via an honest, extensive, and very public investigation into 9/11 and other closely connected matters—comes to the realization that on 9/11/01, America was, essentially (for about the 12th time), fatally and brutally attacked by its “Jewish” friend and ally “Israel,” and that the entire “War on Terror / Muslims” is a complete Zionist-orchestrated, money wasting, life wasting, genocidal fraud. In this truth exposure scenario you, as an investigator and researcher, are essentially discovering truths that can turn the majority of the world’s population completely against the most international, best organized, and highly funded criminal cartels in human history. If you are an academically trained researcher with great public credibility, and you possess potential massive and respected information exposure because of published works of credible, unassailable research, you have the serious potential of shutting this international cartel down FOR GOOD and FOREVER by exposing its many and various ponzi schemes.

Thus, my take on people who know, or should know perfectly well, what is going on here, such as Amy Goodman, Noam Chomsky, or DRG, yet are somehow in the habit of making timid, or even completely illogical and asinine statements on 9/11 and its highly prominent and flammable Israeli connections, is that their goal is to avoid a late night visit from Ha Mossad le Modiyn ve le Tafkidim Mayukhadim (‘The Institute for Intelligence and Special Operations’). To put it another way, if you are a very “public” (i.e., very reachable, identifiable) figure, and you have the informational potential to shut “the big game” down, the above Intelligence Institute (as was clearly demonstrated during the “Israeli art students” operation) assuredly knows where you work and where you live. And as the U.S. Army Intelligence estimate in Jane’s Defense Weekly described them – the folks in this organization are ruthless, unpredictable, and very violently and militantly “hard-core.” They strictly follow the Moshe Dayan philosophy of acting like ‘mad dogs’ whose paths all will fear to cross (‘cause they so psycho-killer-frothing-fkn-kraazy). It’s all about intimidation and throwing people off the tops of buildings, and such.

DRG’s research and argumentation on 9/11 as an “inside (i.e., non-Arab) job” has been very tight and top-notch. My take on his not wanting—as a highly public figure—to champion the cause of FULL 9/11 TRUTH before the launching of a real 9/11 investigation with full subpoena power (which is never going to happen, outside of an armed and successful second American revolution), is that he is choosing to stay alive and “fight” another day.

We may naively demand that full research and publication of that research concerning this subject matter is a matter of “free speech” and “freedom of the press,” but the people who control that “free” press, and the people who control them, want us to either shut the fuck up or die, because what we know, and what we can prove, if given a legitimate legal chance, will shut down their entire game forever, and that is something that in their eyes can be entirely prevented due to their fortuitously pre-planned, well-designed control grid.

And on a final note, I also would like to say Hi to Chris, and thanks for sticking around, and thanks for trying to probe the DRG side of things as you have. We have tackled one of the touchiest, most dangerous modern subjects of all, and we need to be aware of the nature of the subject we have tackled and chosen to discover and reveal. O, for the good ol’ simple days when we thought it was just Bush, Cheney, and Rummy, heh, heh, heh... “I was so much younger then. I’m older than that now.” As the Indian Bhagavad-gita teaches, stand up like a warrior for the Truth, and do not be attached to the results, for it is ‘the act of standing up’ that counts.

oh he stated as much. i pointed out to him that hes said he supports the view that the planes were likely flown remotely, at least near the end of the flights, and how that perfectly dovetails with Dov Zakheims shady dealings. he replied that he indeed believes Zakheim was involved but then he gave his ridiculous(imho) excuse about how the COmmission doesnt mention him so he cant. im not trying to be a doom sayer or anything, but i dont know how much time we have to wait for people to come into the fold and then come to their own conclusions. im not saying denounce DRG, but as individuals we should keep the pressure up on him and others in this "movement" to stop self censoring themselves, no matter how tactically sound it seems. its not in my opinion. put him on the spot? i dont know about that, but im all for keeping the pressure up without  being disrespectful. nobody is afraid to point out Pakistans "role" in the attacks, nobody is afraid to point out Saudi Arabias "role" in the attacks, no matter how tenuous those roles are. everybody, it seems, is afraid to point out anything that suggests ISrael may have played a role. its depressing.

this lecture,,"911 and Nationalist Faith" was delivered to a mostly Christian audience, quite synchronous to our conversation.  I highly recommend.

And, he touches on the Presby Church USA treatment...

http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2008/09/14/911-and-nationalist-faith-by-drg/

from guns and butter:

http://www.kpfa.org/archive/id/47346

I don't think he's definable by that one word. he is cautious and careful to be sure but he also seems to have some progressive views. maybe its a label problem...