9/11 Ripple Effect.
Ok, I gotta' admit, for the most part, I like it. What say you?
»
- Big_D's blog
- Login to post comments
|
|
|
Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 72 guests online.
User loginNavigationFeatured Content WTCD Wiki WTCD Compendium WTCD Podcasts Glossary 9/11 TV News Archive 9/11 Unveiled by Enver Masud David Chandler's YouTube Channel Council for the National Interest Popular Mechanics: Money Masters Orwell Rolls in His Grave Reel Bad Arabs Recent blog posts
WTCD User Comments
|
9/11 Ripple Effect.Ok, I gotta' admit, for the most part, I like it. What say you? »
|
PollCan Maduro get a fair trial from Alvin Hellerstein? Of course, Judge Hellerstein is a jurist with integrity. 0% No, Judge Hellerstein works on behalf of the Zionist deep state. 0% Whether he does or not is irrelevant, Maduro is part of the op. 0% He will be bribed into pleading guilty to something minor. 100% Other (specify in comments.) 0% Total votes: 1
Disqus Comments |
I watched about 1/2 hour of
I watched about 1/2 hour of it.
It starts off with Von Kleist hyperventilating about the pods & flashes. That's bad... a very weak distraction. It bolsters the pod/flash noise with clips of Kevin Barrett & Jim Marrs questioning them. Barrett's been shaking my confidence in him lately-- last night's WTPRN show he had on another energy beam kook. I also saw he had clips of Uncle Fetzer.. bad bad bad.
What did you like about it, Big_D? I'm disinclined to watch the rest of it.
[c]
I'm with [c]
It's like it was made three years ago... von Kleist, Fetzer, pods, no DRG that I saw from my quick scan, no dancing Israelis...
bleh. sorry Big_D, I just don't see it...
I watched it awhile back
I cant put my finger on it, something about the movie just didnt sit right with me. Not sure if its the pod theory or seeing Fetzer in it. Either way, the vibe wasnt right for me. I tend to listen to my intiution alot.
*************************
The 11th Day of Every Month
[c] is me...
I'm not anonymous, I just play one on tv, er, approved that anonymous post.
oooohhhhhh
now i get it. thanks for the tip. have you played around with the drupal, cass? i think there are logs and such that tell us who done what like who done appoved an annoymouse comment... but anyway, i'll try to remember to id myself as the approver. i think it's just you and me anyway--the hall monitors may be asleep on the job... ;)
off topic--I notice chertoff's conscience has tied it up with his pre-emptive cipro regimen--this is a tight one (that's what chertoff's conscience said--ha!)
Hey, I'm not asleep!
I just didn't mark everything I approved -- that's what our local total information awareness is for. Also, I'm not egomanical enough to plaster my markings all over the place -- just look at my avatar!
;)
_________________________________
happiness is either here or nowhere
ewww...
are you saying that Casseia's surprised little dog there is marking territory on our blog?
Uhm...no?
But it's interesting that you would think so :p
_________________________________
happiness is either here or nowhere
Yes, I did poke around in the Drupal
to see if there was a log for that -- and maybe there is and I just didn't find it. I thought I'd make it public, anyway, but I've kind of lost track of why it seemed important -- I think once KT's fan club faded away it became a non-issue.
She's a female pug ;)
of course how silly of me
quite a looker, too--she must drive the boy pugs absolutely wild! is she yours?
i'm groggy, but not asleep
i've deleted one spam comment with about 200 links to articles on cipro or something. the handful of ones i've approved have not been initialized, but also were not deemed offensive so i didn't think it really mattered. if i ever do come across and approve a borderline comment, you'll know it was me.
my bad
you guys are doing a heckuva job! no really--a HECKUVA job... :)
It has *some* redeeming qualities.
I almost shut it off after about a 1/2 hour too. Guess I'm a glutton for punishment. Or, I'm so indifferent to all the Shills & their bullshit I think the truth will stand on it's own merit.
I thought the pod idea had a funeral a couple of years ago...
but it looks like the pod people are back, with a vengence! What really unsettled me about watching this video was the fact that Glen Stanish, founder of Pilots for 9/11 Truth and 20 year professional Airline Pilot endorses the pod theory. This is someone who I grew to really respect, with his work on the Pentagon flight 77 stuff. I thought that Pilots for 9/11 Truth did such an excellent job of debunking the Pentagon disinfo crap put out by the likes of Hoffman and Arabesque, with their impressive stamp of credibility from being experienced airline pilots and all. How can Glen put his stamp of approval on a speculative theory based on blurry and inconclulsive video? What do other people think about Glen Stanish?
Some people say that the pod issue is only a small part of this movie and that the movie should still be considered a good, professionally done video that will wake up a lot of people to 9/11. I disagree. The pod theory is not just a small insignificant part of this movie. It is the Main Feature. It is the first part of the movie. It suggests that the pod theory is our "best evidence". If people who watch this video come away thinking that the pod theory is our "best evidence", then the 9/11 truth movement will suffer.
I don't get the outrage.
I didn't catch the part where the suggestion was made that the pods were the "best evidence". Besides fetzer I think everyone else did a great job. Stanish' remarks near the end are spot on & yes, he's got my respect and was right not to dismiss the pods. It's most likely the planes were switched, just read operation northwoods.
this isn't like space beams or no planes in my view. Were there pods, don't know. Were their explosions just before the planes contacted the building, clearly. Is it important & would you wanna discuss this to convert the official conspiracy believer, no. Looks more like a rebuttal to PM in my opinion.
I also believe the planes were switched...
but I don't think we need the pod theory to prove it.
Placing the pod section as the first part of the movie and spending as much time on it as they did implies that the pod theory is some of our best evidence. It's just implied.
The point is that any speculative theory based on blurry and inconclusive evidence is easy to debunk and sets us up to be made to look like whack jobs. I have seen enough pictures and video of enough angles of the plane to be convinced that the "pod" is nothing more than the normal wing ferring. The flash is definately harder to explain away, and again, does not depend on the "pod" theory. We already have solid evidence based on science and hard proof that the buildings were not destroyed by muslims with box cutters, we don't need to push any speculative theories for converting people to the truth. It doesn't really help us, but puts us at risk of being ridiculed so why do it? I cannot recommend this movie because of it. There are plenty of more credible videos to use instead.