Onward Peaceful Soldiers for Veritas!

gretavo's picture

But is it Good for the Jews?

Published On Monday, November 03, 2008  10:28 PM

“If Barack Obama doesn’t become the next president of the United States,” comedian Sarah Silverman says in her YouTube video advertisement for The Great Schlep, “I’m gonna blame the Jews.” In September, when I went home for Rosh Hashanah and told my family that I supported Obama, I heard a very different ultimatum: If Barack Obama does become the next president of the United States, they’re going to blame the Jews. Orthodox Jews like my parents are an often overlooked demographic, even for organizations like The Great Schlep. Nevertheless, their objections to an Obama administration are forceful—if not valid—and should be taken into account by Jews planning to vote Democrat today.

In the ad for The Great Schlep—a movement started by the Jewish Council for Education and Research to encourage Jewish grandchildren to visit their grandparents in Florida and convince them to vote for Obama—Silverman asserts that the targeted demographic won’t vote for Obama for a number of reasons. These bubbes and zaides may think “his name sounds scary; it sounds Muslim,” among other superficial issues.

Obviously, Silverman intended her ad to be funny, but her plea is quite serious. Now more than ever, even Jews who support—and will vote for—Obama and the Democrats, have taken extra impetus to do so, not just because of Obama’s Muslim-sounding name. According to a 2008 annual survey by the American Jewish Committee, Obama has 57 percent of the American Jewish vote , the lowest Jewish support for a Democratic candidate since Carter’s feeble 45 percent in 1980 against Republican challenger Ronald Reagan. And by ignoring the fundamental issues that older Jews have with Obama, Silverman weakens her case.

Silverman is not alone in asserting that Obama’s policies towards Israel are strong. Harvard Law School professor Alan M. Dershowitz recently published an opinion piece in which defended his support of Obama because “the election of…a liberal supporter of Israel will enhance Israel’s position among wavering liberals.” Last week, Steve Grossman, former president of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, championed Obama’s commitment to Israel’s security at a discussion of the candidates’ foreign policies at the Harvard Hillel. And because of Obama’s devotion to Israel’s right to self-defense and his liberal attitudes on social issues, the JCER wholeheartedly supports Obama as the right candidate for the Jewish people.

It is precisely Jews like Dershowitz and Grossman who my parents will blame if Obama gets elected, because they fail to recognize signs that perhaps Obama is not quite the messiah for whom the all Jewish people have been waiting. Despite Obama’s official stances on most Israel policy issues, it is hard to ignore my family’s contention that it is sheer negligence for Jews to elect a candidate who may not have a consistently pro-Israel policy.

In June 2006 speech, Obama promised the AIPAC that Jerusalem would remain undivided. The next day he retracted this promise under fire from the President of the Palestinian National Authority. Obama’s former pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, once condemned Israel as a “dirty word.” A Los Angeles Times article from April asserts that Obama’s close connection with Rashid Khalidi, a critic of Israeli policy and professor of arab studies at Columbia University, “has led some Palestinian leaders to believe that he might deal differently with the Middle East than his opponents for the White House,” however pro-Israel Obama continues to be. The article suggests that the Palestinian leaders’ belief “is not drawn from Obama’s speeches or campaign literature, but from comments that some say Obama made in private and from his association with the Palestinian American community.”

Perhaps the most urgent issue, however, is Obama’s unwavering policy to negotiate without preconditions with Iran, a country headed by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has asserted that wiping Israel off the map is “a very wise statement.” Although Silverman calls Obama’s foreign policy “more stabilizing” for Israel, this opinion fails to convey the magnitude of what is at stake. National Review columnist Anne Bayefsky best articulates this viewpoint, writing that “since the time of Hitler, civilization has never been so close to the brink of total catastrophe” in reference to a possible nuclear attack by Iran on Israel, among other threats to geopolitical stability. For children of Holocaust survivors, McCain’s more aggressive Iran policy, including a refusal to negotiate with Iran, is infinitely superior to Obama’s economic sanctions and precondition-less negotiations. The bombs fell too late in World War II.

For my family, the choice is clear: our heritage or Obama. Even if the two are not mutually exclusive, as I and 57 percent of Jews believe, Jews must at least be conscious of what an Obama administration means both for our past and for our future. I hope that Silverman’s blame does not fall on us, but even if it does, we should take it in stride.

Avishai D. Don ’12, a Crimson editorial comper, lives in Matthews Hall.


    3 Comments

    Greta

    • Mr. Don, the president of Iran did not as you claim say that "wiping Israel off the map" is avery wise statement. You are referencing a mistranslation of his actual words that however incorrect and misleading as to his intent has been repeated ad nauseum by irresponsible politicians and political pundits.

      The full quote translated directly to English:

      "The Imam said this regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time."

      Word by word translation:

      Imam (Khomeini) ghoft (said) een (this) rezhim-e (regime) ishghalgar-e (occupying) qods (Jerusalem) bayad (must) az safheh-ye ruzgar (from page of time) mahv shavad (vanish from).

      source: http://www.antiwar.com/orig/norouzi.php?article...

      It is moreover rather presumptuous of anyone to suggest, imply, insinuate, or directly state that Jewish people should support Israel. Many Jewish people are as concerned as the rest of the world about Israel's secret arsenal of nuclear weapons that allows for no international oversight and Israel's refusal to sign the Non Proliferation Treaty. Many Jews (and not just the rabbis of Neturei Karta) actually agree with the idea behind the conference where Ahmadinejad was misquoted--the conference titled "The World WIthout Zionism". Jewish American (and Green Party member) Joel Kovel's book Overcoming Zionism convincingly makes the case that for there ever to be peace in the middle east--in fact to avoid a catastrophe there--the only viable and just solution is one secular state of Israel-Palestine where members of all faiths are considered equal.

      In fact, you also fail to note the most ironic thing about "the great schlep"--as the Forward recently reported based on Gallup poll trends younger Jewish voters are actually *less* likely than their elders to support Obama. http://www.forward.com/articles/14481/

    dgolding
    This editorial states the obvious--older, more conservative Jews have drifted towards the Republican Party because of its hawkish stance on Israel (though Jews in general remain one of the most liberal voting blocs in the population). But it never engages seriously with the question of whether these voters are justified in their perception of the Republican Party as the stronger advocate for American Jews and the state of Israel. Before the (relatively recent) unholy alliance between neoconservatives and millenial evangelicals, Republicans had no interest in defending Israel...it was Harry Truman--a Democrat--who made the radically unpopular decision to recognize the state of Israel upon its founding , against the vehement objections of the state department, which was notoriously anti-Semitic. Contrary to what Republican scare-mongerers would have American Jews believe, Democrats have always been the stronger party on Israel, rhetoric aside. Jews should be wary of evangelical support--stemming as it does from absurd dogma instead of rational conviction (see the perverse pentecostalist fantasies of Sarah Palin's church.) Bellicose neocons who out-Likud the Likud party provide nothing but extreme, inflammatory rhetoric /racism, and end up undermining international support for Israel more than anything. Moreover, the idea that Obama is fraternizing with anti-Israel subversives is no more credible--and actually just as mean-spirited--as the by now familiar claim that he "pals around with terrorists." Rashid Khalidi is a respected professor and moderate who couldn't be further from the frothing PLO caricature the Republicans would have us believe him to be.

    The second premise of this editorial is just offensive. The notion that Jews must choose between our "heritage" and our consciences as democratic citizens perpetuates the worst stereotypes about Jewish clannishness and cultural chauvinism. There may be many Jews who actually believe this, but we should work to combat such sad paranoia instead of indulging it. Jews have historically thrived in liberal, cosmpolitian societies. They should be very skeptical this election year of voting for a party that appeals to the worst instincts of nativism, religious zealotry. Here, as always, the enemy of your enemy is not your friend.

    Greta 0 minutes ago

    You say, dgolding, that Jews should be wary of evangelical support--I certainly can't argue with that. But Jews should also be wary of the "Israel right or wrong" attitude that presupposes that Zionism--the idea of a Jewish state--is a good thing for Jews. As unfortunate as historic, religiously dogmatic Jew-hatred is, the truth is that the enlightenment, by rejecting the dogmatic authority of all religion--not just the various christian sects but also that of the rabbinate, began a period of unprecedented emancipation and assimilation of Jews into European society. Sadly for those Jews who found their Jewishness becoming less and less of an issue overall (save perhaps in Russia where the religious walls on both sides remained most impermeable), the decline of religious authority over their lives was soon replaced by the secular authority of international Zionism which managed to resurrect in different terms the idea that Jews and non-Jews were inherently different and what's more, "naturally" in conflict (as per the idea that so-called anti-semitism is impossible to eradicate so one need not bother trying.) Worse yet, Zionism has served as a useful tool of economic elites with and without connections to Judaism to replace the old European imperialism in the middle east with a new more volatile and opaque version, leading to the rise of the previously virtually non-existent phenomenon of arab and/or muslim antipathy toward Jews. While I am not Jewish, I sympathize with those Jews who feel obliged by peer pressure (on penalty of being shunned as a "self-hater") to support a regime in the middle east that is without question guilty of the same kind of dispossession that we as Americans must forever bear the guilt of having centuries ago displaced a native population. Those who wish to go beyond rhetoric and propaganda should check out Joel Kovel's book Overcoming Zionism but also the works of the secular Jewish Israeli Israel Shahak. In a post-9/11 world all of us who desire a true and lasting peace in the world need to grow outside our comfort zones and tackle these issues lest we all fall victim to a cynical and destructive protection racket based on mutual mistrust and irrational fear stoked by people whose agenda lies far afield of human understanding.

    Comment viewing options

    Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
    casseia's picture

    Greta sounds like a smart chick.

    Your drag name?

    gretavo's picture

    god you're phallocentric

    I think it was on the NYT forums years ago when posting as Gretavo I got the nickname "Red Greta". As you can see I'm no longer a commie sympathizer.

    casseia's picture

    Hey, I was just sayin'

    I don't usually swing that way, but brains are a big turn-on for me...

    bruce1337's picture

    I was just about to crash your little cozy conversation

    but then figured it would almost compare to coitus interruptus. So, actually, this comment isn't even here.
    _________________________________
    happiness is either here or nowhere

    casseia's picture

    You've never heard "the more the merrier"?

    I mean, I don't usually swing *that* way, either, but they're immanentizing the eschaton today, so I figger what the hell.

    gretavo's picture

    actually my experience is...

    ...the more the *messier*. it's a well known fact too that the best way to eat forbidden fruit is outside in the nude with a friend of the same sexual persuasion, being careful not to spill any of the seed.

    gulu's picture

    Carefull gretavo

    dont fall for that "honey pot".Its quite obvious now./

    gretavo's picture

    what comment?

    oh well, carry on c4$$...