THE O JESSE KNOWS - JACKSON ON OBAMA'S AMERICA

Jackson: Expects Obama to stop "putting Israel's interests first" in making Mideast policy.
"Jackson believes that, although "Zionists who have controlled American policy for decades" remain strong, they'll lose a great deal of their clout when Barack Obama enters the White House."
Who's he kidding? Jesse knows that AIPAC has a tight cord cinched around Obama's fuzzy yarbels. And, he'd be well off not even contemplating any future heists. Obama's family jewels are heavily guarded by alien art students from planet Mossad.
By AMIR TAHERI
October 14, 2008
EVIAN, FRANCE (Flouride in the water?)
PREPARE for a new America: That's the message that the Rev. Jesse
Jackson conveyed to participants in the first World Policy Forum, held
at this French lakeside resort last week.
He promised "fundamental changes" in US foreign policy - saying
America must "heal wounds" it has caused to other nations, revive its
alliances and apologize for the "arrogance of the Bush administration."
The most important change would occur in the Middle East, where "decades of putting Israel's interests first" would end.
Jackson believes that, although "Zionists who have controlled
American policy for decades" remain strong, they'll lose a great deal
of their clout when Barack Obama enters the White House.
"Obama is about change," Jackson told me in a wide-ranging
conversation. "And the change that Obama promises is not limited to
what we do in America itself. It is a change of the way America looks
at the world and its place in it."
Jackson warns that he isn't an Obama confidant or adviser, "just a
supporter." But he adds that Obama has been "a neighbor or, better
still, a member of the family." Jackson's son has been a close friend
of Obama for years, and Jackson's daughter went to school with Obama's
wife Michelle.
"We helped him start his career," says Jackson. "And then we were
always there to help him move ahead. He is the continuation of our
struggle for justice not only for the black people but also for all
those who have been wronged."
Will Obama's election close the chapter of black grievances linked
to memories of slavery? The reverend takes a deep breath and waits a
long time before responding.
"No, that chapter won't be closed," he says. "However, Obama's
victory will be a huge step in the direction we have wanted America to
take for decades."
Jackson rejects any suggestion that Obama was influenced by Marxist
ideas in his youth. "I see no evidence of that," he says. "Obama's
thirst for justice and equality is rooted in his black culture."
But is Obama - who's not a descendant of slaves - truly a typical American black?
Jackson emphatically answers yes: "You don't need to be a
descendant of slaves to experience the oppression, the suffocating
injustice and the ugly racism that exists in our society," he says.
"Obama experienced the same environment as all American blacks did. It
was nonsense to suggest that he was somehow not black enough to feel
the pain."
Is Jackson worried about the "Bradley effect" - that people may be
telling pollsters they favor the black candidate, but won't end up
voting for him?
"I don't think this is how things will turn out," he says. "We have
a collapsing economy and a war that we have lost in Iraq. In
Afghanistan, we face a resurgent Taliban. New threats are looming in
Pakistan. Our liberties have been trampled under feet . . . Today, most
Americans want change, and know that only Barack can deliver what they
want. Young Americans are especially determined to make sure that Obama
wins."
He sees a broad public loss of confidence in the nation's
institutions: "We have lost confidence in our president, our Congress,
our banking system, our Wall Street and our legal system to protect our
individual freedoms. . . I don't see how we could regain confidence in
all those institutions without a radical change of direction."
Jackson declines to be more concrete about possible policy changes.
After all, he insists, he isn't part of Obama's policy team. Yet he
clearly hopes that his views, reflecting the position of many
Democrats, would be reflected in the policies of an Obama
administration.
On the economic front, he hopes for "major changes in our trading policy."
"We cannot continue with the open-door policy," he says. "We need
to protect our manufacturing industry against unfair competition that
destroys American jobs and creates ill-paid jobs abroad."
Would that mean an abrogation of the NAFTA treaty with Canada and Mexico?
Jackson dismisses the question as "premature": "We could do a great deal without such dramatic action."
His most surprising position concerns Iraq. He passionately
denounces the toppling of Saddam Hussein as "an illegal and unjust
act." But he's now sure that the United States "will have to remain in
Iraq for a very long time."
What of Obama's promise to withdraw by 2010? Jackson believes that
position will have to evolve, reflecting "realities on the ground."
"We should work with our allies in Iraq to consolidate democratic
institutions there," he says. "We must help the people of Iraq decide
and shape their future in accordance with their own culture and faith."
On Iran, he strongly supports Obama's idea of opening a direct
dialogue with the leadership in Tehran. "We've got to talk to tell them
what we want and hear what they want," Jackson says. "Nothing is gained
by not talking to others."
Would that mean ignoring the four UN Security Council resolutions
that demand an end to Iran's uranium-enrichment program? Jackson says
direct talks wouldn't start without preparations.
"Barack wants an aggressive and dynamic diplomacy," he says. "He
also wants adequate preparatory work. We must enter the talks after the
ground has been prepared," he says.
Jackson is especially critical of President Bush's approach to the Israel-Palestine conflict.
"Bush was so afraid of a snafu and of upsetting Israel that he gave
the whole thing a miss," Jackson says. "Barack will change that,"
because, as long as the Palestinians haven't seen justice, the Middle
East will "remain a source of danger to us all."
"Barack is determined to repair our relations with the world of
Islam and Muslims," Jackson says. "Thanks to his background and
ecumenical approach, he knows how Muslims feel while remaining
committed to his own faith."
- dicktater's blog
- Login to post comments

ah, my secret fantasy
That Obama wins and then tells the Zionists to fuck off.
-------
"It is difficult to get the news from poems yet men die miserably every day for lack of what is found there."
--William Carlos Williams (from the poem 'From')
I don't suppose you also fantasize about bridges...
...because if you do I have some lovely bridges that just came on the market and are going to go fast. :)
The Zionists already have
The Zionists already have 'best friend of Israel' Bidden as insurance in case Obama forgets who payed for his campaign and managed the media to let him get where he is. I still prefer Obama to McInsane, like Clinton to Bush, I would expect smaller less obvious ops like the Oklahoma City bombing vs grand slams like 9-11.
Jackson sounds so much
Jackson sounds so much better than Obama
he does! and it's so much easier
to understand what he's saying when it's in print! sheeezzz.
I like everything he says . . .
except that we need to stay in Iraq a long time.
E
-------
"It is difficult to get the news from poems yet men die miserably every day for lack of what is found there."
--William Carlos Williams (from the poem 'From')
A kinder, gentler brand of terror?
I would expect smaller less obvious ops like the Oklahoma City bombing vs grand slams like 9-11"
A kinder, gentler brand of terror?
"A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you're talking real money."
~~ attributed to Senator Everett Dirksen
I dont know if kinder or
I dont know if kinder or gentler is apt to describe a reduced rate of terror and mass murder, but a lower body count is always more preferred compared to a higher body count.
McInsane looks like the type of guy that would dive head first into a nuclear war for Israel and war profits.
Obama has at least put on record that he wants a US pullout from Iraq within a few years, that gives him less wiggle room to change policy in the opposite direction if he does become president - though possibly at the expense of more troops in Afghanistan. If McCain becomes president, I think he will take it as an endorsement of imperialist policies and would have no hesitation to increase boots on the ground in Iraq (and probably in Afghanistan and Iran as well).
Of course the best leader is neither of them, but I don't think Americans have learned their lesson yet and will probably maintain this stupid system of electing a leader from between the Republicans and Democrats.
i've done a 180
I used to think Obama couldn't win but now I don't think he can lose. I don't know if that's justified or not since there is still some time during which a "comeback" swing in the polls could take place pulling McCain close enough to muddle the public's expectation of the result.
But clearly Obama is supported widely and having seen his manner with Joe the plumber I think he is gifted enough, perhaps more than Bill Clinton, to make people like him genuinely as opposed to from out of hype.
And even if Obama supports the 9/11 Myth, or is simply afraid to go there, at least he has no discernible active participation in the crime or cover-up. If he becomes president of course many of his actions could well become interpreted as assisting the cover-up depending on the extent to which they may hinder holding the guilty accountable.
If McCain is "elected", then the president of the US will be a man who has undoubtedly hindered the search for the truth about 9/11 for one by endorsing the bogus debunking book 9/11 Myths put out by the "editors of Popular Mechanics."
This would be good for activism in the sense that more people would be motivated to question 9/11 but could be less good in terms of getting people to take the leap of being willing to entertain notions of wrongdoing by people they had believed to be trustworthy on any given issue. That mental adjustment, awakening, shift or whatever one wishes to characterize it as is a key part of 9/11 truth becoming mainstream--not just ok but THE mainstream, the norm.
2nd lawsuit challenges Obama's citizenship
"Mr. Obama failed to respond to the District Court's request to produce or allow access to the official documents (should they exist) and instead filed a motion to dismiss arguing the Plaintiff had no 'standing' or right to know," he [Berg] said.
A little early for executive priviledge, isn't it? On it's face, Marquis' demands of the Washington Secretary of State sounds reasonable, though.
2nd lawsuit challenges Obama's citizenship>
Man demands state verify birth records or remove senator from ballots
Posted: October 16, 2008
By Chelsea Schilling
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=78111
In a second lawsuit challenging Barack Obama's "natural born" citizenship, a Washington resident is demanding officials review original or certified birth documents for the Democratic Party presidential candidate.
Steven Marquis of Fall City, Wash., filed suit Oct. 9 in Washington State Superior Court, calling for Secretary of State Sam Reed to determine whether Obama is a citizen before Election Day. Marquis released a statement saying the state has the authority to "prevent the wholesale disenfranchisement of voters" who might have otherwise had the opportunity to choose a qualified candidate should records show Obama is not a natural-born U.S. citizen.
"At this point, Mr. Obama has not allowed independent or official access to his birth records nor supporting hospital records," Marquis wrote. "The Hawaii Health Department has violated Federal law by ignoring formal Freedom of Information requests for the same."
Marquis referenced prominent Pennsylvania Democrat and attorney Philip J. Berg's lawsuit in U.S. District Court against Sen. Barack Obama and the Democratic National Committee for proof of Obama's American citizenship.
"Mr. Obama failed to respond to the District Court's request to produce or allow access to the official documents (should they exist) and instead filed a motion to dismiss arguing the Plaintiff had no 'standing' or right to know," he said. "This non-response as of 9/24/2008 in Federal court casts doubt on the veracity of the electoral system and is the principal reason for this lawsuit."
Marquis said his late entry of the lawsuit is due to Obama's "delay and subsequent non response to reasonable request for valid certificates."
He indicated that his requests for certification of the birth documents were rejected by Washington's Office of the Secretary of State. Marquis requested an injunction to force the office to confirm Obama's U.S. citizenship or remove his name from Washington ballots. He said the agency is "specifically charged with certifying and guaranteeing the veracity of official documents and overseeing the elections to wit the people's confidence in the fundamental aspect of democracy is maintained."
However, Marquis continued, "To date, in this regard, Secretary of State Sam Reed has not carried out that fundamental duty."
Phil Berg, eh?
Gee, I wonder if Obama supporters will be told that Berg is also a "truther lawyer" even though he hardly passes muster as even a fake truther...
Not likely they'll be told
How many of them know Berg is a life-long Democrat?
Given the massive increase in the level of hubris exhibited by state public serpents in issues of election fraud, it will be interesting to see how this plays out in Washington.
Frankly, I don't know why Obama's handlers have let this go so far unless it truly has no merit and they intend to drive a stake through McInsain's heart with bonafide proof that the messiah is indeed a U.S. citizen (emphasis lower case "c").
"A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you're talking real money."
~~ attributed to Senator Everett Dirksen
Obama Fall Guy
I have flipped on the next selected president also.I think McPantload/Failin ticket is deliberate to lose the election so the coming depression can be somehow manipulated to blame the democrats and for jobless whites to blame jobless blacks and jobless mexicans for their problems.All the while being fed subliminal hate filled mind food by the MSM to divide the country.Just a thought.
I agree with you gulu
I can tell your headband isn't on too tight. I don't know that it is manipulated so much to blame the Dimwits in as much to take advantage of the stupid and gullible who believe that the other head of the rabid two-headed dog don't bite.
Not too long ago, I truly believed that witch, Shillary, was next in line for the throne. I envisioned her getting on teevee after some manufactured catastrophic event with tears and makeup running down her face, sobbing about how she didn't want to declare martial law and kill us but, she just had to. Bathed in blue light, mind-twisted teevee twits who just knew they could "feel her pain" would be sobbing, too, all the while nodding, and gurgling "She don't wanna hasta kill us but, she got to."
Whatever happens, and at this point I believe it will be total economic melt-down, it will be used so as to pit hispanics, blacks, and whites all against one another in a final divide and conquer assault. Obama may be their hope for a messiah who can lead the remnants ever closer to their envisioned New World Odor.
"A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you're talking real money."
~~ attributed to Senator Everett Dirksen