Holocaust revisionist Gerald Fredrick Toben arrested at Heathrow
Holocaust denier arrested
October 2, 2008
AUSTRALIAN Holocaust revisionist Gerald Fredrick Toben has been arrested at London's Heathrow airport.
British police executed a European Union arrest warrant issued by German authorities at Heathrow late last night Melbourne time.
The arrest warrant accuses 64-year-old Toben of publishing material on the internet "of an anti-Semitic and/or revisionist nature" in Australia, Germany and other countries.
The alleged Holocaust denier was to appear later at the City of Westminster Magistrates Court.
Toben, a former teacher in Victoria, has been involved in lengthy court proceedings in Australia for allegedly denying the Holocaust, and was jailed in Germany in 1999.
»
- dicktater's blog
- Login to post comments
Extradite Toben, Declare Total War On Michael James
and renommiert historians, has indecently been illegally arrested by a
sycophantic police force who once swore loyalty to the Queen and were
legally committed to the protection and upholding of the law of the land
and the defence of every citizen of the British Commonwealth against the
abusive crimes of foreign states gone mad.
must be spinning in his grave. That a patriotic citizen of the British
Commonwealth, who fought the Jewish-backed Marxists in Rhodesia, can
be delivered, hand, stock and barrel to the enemies of mankind, the treacherous
European Ashkenazi Jewry, must turn the guts of every freeborn Englishmen.
I vomit in disgust.
historians in the western world. His crime: He has seriously posited
exceedingly intelligent questions about the accuracy of the so- called
number of Jews alleged to have perished at the hands of the patriotic
Hitler regime. His "thought crimes" pale into insignificance
with mine; for although I live and write in Germany, and have fearsomely
researched this topic more thoroughly than any existing writer living
in the "safelands", I can absolutely and with no doubt in my
mind say that there was no systematic murder of the "Jews" as
outlined in the post 1970s hysteria propagated by fat overpaid Hollywood
moguls such a Stephen Spielberg.
Germany; yet not one lawyer has hairs enough on his testicles to arrest
me because I would make a Socratic laughing stock out these anti- German,
anti-Christ traitors in court.
legitimise the illegal existence of the bandit Zionist state of Israel.
I have written plenty of articles that have proven beyond a shadow of
a doubt that the Shoah is a Kabbalistic fairy tale of epic proportions.
I have been prosecuted by the Central Council of Jews in Germany for having
exposed them as a bunch of scum-ridden liars, and yet the Senior State
Attorney has vindicated my argument. The establishment knows that I'm
telling the truth.
three- dimensional chess. They get lost somewhere in the forth dimension
and blame it on our ignorance. Funny thing is, they can't play fifth-dimensional
chess. I can. They can't. In anger, they tip the table. They're not as
smart as they think.
"Alice in Wonderland" rip-off, replete with Anne Franks who
write sob stories with ballpoint-pens that were not manufactured until
the 1950s. It represents nothing more than a vast moneymaking machine.
They have screwed us backwards, forwards and every time we open our mouths.
chambers ever existed. They served only as delousing clinics. The seminal
testimony "Sachenshausen-Workauta" (banned in Germany) proved
beyond a shadow of a doubt that the "gas chambers" were created
as tourist attractions in 1948. There exists not one eyewitness testimony
to the death of a Jew in any so-called "gas chamber". That is
an historical fact. Call me on it. Nobody can ever prove me wrong.
in line with both his own Cadre and the Zionist Party of Germany, to intern
Jewish people only for the purpose of producing war armaments. In Auschwitz
and elsewhere, they were paid a decent wage, were fed adequately (as millions
of Germans starved to death) and were given access to all the machinery
needed to defeat to the allied advance. Some Jews lived for and prayed
for the victory of the USSSR. Many supported Hitler. The agreement was
that that loyal Jews would soon obtain their own homeland, probably in
Madagascar.
1.3 million between 1937 and 1947 is something willingly admitted by
the Jewish Bureau of Statistics and the Red Cross, but cannily overlooked
by hooked-nosed historians with their beady snouts in the trough of high
finance. Not even Churchill, a half-Jew, mentioned this so-called "atrocious
crime" against his own people.
a Jew during the Second World War (which was only an extension of the
first world war in which International World Jewry declared "Germany
Must Perish!"), you probably never had it so good. Certainly you
were not amongst the 60 million European Christians who slaughtered themselves
in an intractable bloodbath to fatten out your investments war dividends
on Wall Street.
Fredrick Toben. The so-called European Warrant of Arrest is laughably
illegal, for several reasons: it contravenes UK law; the Zionist European
Union is illegal, became jurisdictionally illegal because the Federal
Republic of Germany itself was an illegitimate corporation at its inception
and had no right to sign the Treaty of Rome; the Zionist BRD became officially
defunct in September 1990 upon reunification and has no right to try citizens
subject to the post-war SHAEF laws, of which Australia was a signatory.
lawyer a list that put will put Mrs Merkel and her Zionist hook-nosed
snout- pigs in the position of shelf-fillers at a local Aldi store.
with Michael James. I am a man of no means and weak of health, but I shall
walk all the way to Mannheim to defend him and bring the illicit German
government to heel. I never lose any battle I fight.
it Ms. Zypries?) Bring Mr Toben to Germany and I shall destroy the illegal
Federal Republic of Germany.
resident in Germany since 1992 with additional long-haul stays in East
Africa, Poland and Switzerland. He is committed to national revolutionary
change in Germany and England.
With friends like this...
There are several utterly repellent statements, many which reflect a (at worst) raging judaeophobia or (at best) an inexcusable semantic recklessness, in this piece.
"Jewish-backed Marxists in Rhodesia"
Same old same old here with the use of of the word "Jewish." Were there Zionists backing the Marxists?
"the enemies of mankind, the treacherous
European Ashkenazi Jewry"
Does it get any more judaeophobic than this?
"yet not one lawyer has hairs enough on his testicles to arrest me because I would make a Socratic laughing stock out these anti- German, anti-Christ traitors in court."
It's not enough to have balls these days -- you have to have hairy balls? Give me an effin' break. But on a more serious note, Jesus does not need poorly groomed judaeophobes to defend him -- I think he can probably take care of himself. Quasi-anti-Zionism, actually judaeophobia, based on the promotion of Jeebzus, is disgusting.
"The Jews are playing twisted chess with us. We can play
three- dimensional chess. They get lost somewhere in the forth dimension and blame it on our ignorance. Funny thing is, they can't play fifth-dimensional chess. I can. They can't. In anger, they tip the table. They're not as
smart as they think."
Did this diatribe suddenly transmute into a scene from Star Trek: The Next Generation? (Come to think of it, Data has a pretty large nose.) At this point, the guy is sounding like a nutjob.
"hooked-nosed historians with their beady snouts in the trough of high finance. Not even Churchill, a half-Jew, mentioned this so-called "atrocious crime" against his own people."
Is there ANY REASON to be using horrid cliches like "hook-nosed" other than to perfidiously "defend" a cause, not with weak arguments, but with the kind of discourse that instantly makes the reader throw up into her mouth a little (or a lot)? For fuck's sake, man...
On a deeper, more significant level, this guy has a theory of Jewish identity -- a fixed essential quality, not purely racial, not purely religious -- that he shares with Zionists. And it should go without saying that Real anti-Zionists threw it on the ash heap of history a while ago.
"The fact is, if you were a Jew during the Second World War [...] you probably never had it so good. Certainly you
were not amongst the 60 million European Christians who slaughtered themselves in an intractable bloodbath to fatten out your investments war dividends on Wall Street."
Given the number of witnesses, ones who identify as Jewish and ones who do not, who will attest to the enormous suffering in the camps during the war, this kind of statement makes me think the guy is a fucking fake.
"I can give Mr Toben's lawyer a list that put will put Mrs Merkel and her Zionist hook-nosed snout- pigs in the position of shelf-fillers at a local Aldi store."
Doesn't he mean hook-snouted? Aren't all pigs "snout-pigs"? Seriously, though, this kind of rhetoric just stinks to high heaven and really has no place at this blog. It undermines rational arguments for freedom of thought and freedom of speech on behalf of Mr. Toben, by contaminating them with the kind of irrational hatred that scares the crap out of people who identify as Jewish (part of the Zionist protection racket, perhaps) and makes anti-racist anti-Zionists throw up their hands in frustration.
So, who is Michael James?
I've been curious about this Michael James. I don't recall ever seeing him mentioned here before. The piece that I just posted was maybe the third piece I've read written by him. I think that this was the first:
Game Over:
Top German State Attorney Backs Mike James, Jews Silent
http://www.gnosticliberationfront.com/game_over.htm
I've been curious as to why, even though he lives in Germany and has asked many of the same questions that get others incarcerated or indicted, he has been able to escape treatment similar to Toben and Zundel.
Do you know any more of Michael James or is this the first thing of his you have seen?
This is the first I've heard of him...
not that I've spent much time researching the snout- (and scrotal fur-) obsessed, of which he clearly is one.
I'd say there's a high likelihood that the fact that the guy IS so completely disgusting is why he has escaped similar treatment. Helps maintain the illusion that the ONLY people who would ever reconsider aspects of the Holocaust narrative are people who use terms like "hook-nosed" and are on Jesus' team.
He also has an obsessive hatred
of people who work in grocery and convenience stores, I see. (That contempt comes up again on this other page -- wtf?)
The page you link to contains materially which is less viscerally upsetting than the essay above, but then it has links to stuff he has written like "The World Starves as Antichrist Jewish Bankers Grow Fat." What are the terms "antichrist" and "Jewish" doing in that sentence except making it easy to dismiss?
Agent provocateur of sorts?
Judging from my gut reaction here it sounds like the intended effect of an agent provocateur possibly.Much like Frank Collins probably was.Not in the true sense of an A.P. but obtaining their desired results through deception.I'm not saying he is Jewish/Zionist/Rastafarian/Martian,just saying this looks a little suspicious to me.
Frank Collins was the son of Max Cohen, a Jewish survivor of Dachau, a
Nazi concentration camp. He was also the leader of the National Socialist Party
of America. Frank Collins, in short, was a neo-Nazi. He led a party of about
fifty members who goose-stepped about their Chicago headquarters, dressed in
brown-shirted uniforms and black boots. They were a ragtag group of anti-Jew
and antiblack hate-mongers who worshiped Adolf Hitler and proclaimed the
resurrection of the Third Reich.
Few people gave them much notice. The American Jewish Committee kept
tabs on the group but considered it politically impotent and capable only of spewing
vicious propaganda. Even a Nazi publication in Europe called its American
members “dead-beats, right wing kooks, and religious nuts.†But in 1978, it
would have been difficult to find anyone in Skokie, Illinois, who shared this
view. This Chicago suburb had a substantial Jewish population, includingmore
than six hundred survivors of the Holocaust. Many residents were either relatedto or knew one or more of these survivors. The World War II death camps of
Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen, and Auschwitz were not names in a history book
to the citizens of Skokie. They were painful memories.
When Collins sought a permit to hold a rally in a Skokie city park, government
officials told him he would have to get a $350,000 bond; they knew
he could not satisfy this requirement. In response, he planned to assemble his
followers in front of the village hall, wearing full Nazi uniform, and hand out
literature protesting the infringement of his right to speak. The village council
wanted to ignore the group, but the Jewish community was adamantly opposed
and convinced the council to block the rally, even though many Jewish organizations,
such as B’nai B’rith, normally were strong supporters of free expression.
“These weren’t ideas being discussed,†the village attorney argued in response
to newspaper inquiries. “The swastika was not an expression of free
speech. It amounted to an assault [on the Holocaust survivors].â€
The Skokie council passed three ordinances to put their case on firmer footing,
including bans on hate literature and demonstrations by persons wearing
military-style uniforms.When the village used these ordinances to stop the Nazi
rally, Collins enlisted help from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
It was a difficult moment for the ACLU. It abhorred the Nazis’ rants, but it believed
even their hate-filled speech and rallies fell under the protection of the
First Amendment. If government could stop a Nazi demonstration, it also could
stop a Jewish one, the civil liberties organization argued.
By now the case was receiving national attention, and lower state courts
tried vainly to find a way through the emotionally charged battlefield. The Illinois
Appellate Court, citing a U.S. Supreme Court approval of a criminal conviction
for “fighting words†or words likely to provoke a fight, ruled that the
Nazis could march but only in clothing stripped of the swastika. But the state
supreme court reversed the lower court’s decision: the ban on the demonstration
violated the First Amendment. The federal district court upheld the ban;
the ordinances were invalid. Acknowledging that it was tempting to look for an
exception to the guarantee of free speech and assembly in this instance, the court
decided that “it was better to allow those who preach racial hate to expend their
venom in rhetoric than to be panicked into embarking on a dangerous course of
permitting the government to decide what its citizens must say and hear.†The
Supreme Court refused to hear the case, which meant it left intact the lower
court’s ruling that “the freedom of thought carries with it the freedom to speak
and to publicly assemble to express one’s thought.†These rights were at the
heart of democratic government.
Collins revived his plan to demonstrate, but now he faced a massive counterdemonstration
announced by his opponents. Seizing an opportunity to save
face, the neo-Nazi leader changed his mind and shifted his rally to an all-white
suburb of Chicago to avoid what he called “a mob of howling creatures.†He
also announced a demonstration in downtown Chicago. Both events proved to
be anticlimactic: the downtown rally drew twenty-five Nazi demonstrators, two
thousand police, and far more people who screamed their opposition. The suburban
demonstration attracted more than two hundred Nazi sympathizers, but
they too were outnumbered by police and vocal opponents. With all the noise,
few people at either event heard Collins’s speeches.Within minutes, the spectacles
were over.
Following the rallies, representatives from Skokie’s religious bodies held
an interfaith memorial service in memory of the Holocaust victims.
http://sunnylandsclassroom.org/Downloads/ACBooks/Our%20Rights/Chapters/C...
Yes, I agree... and some of my best friends are Martian
Rastafarians, so I appreciate your clarification. In the story you've posted here I think the word "spectacle" is especially salient. Spectacles seem to work hand-in-glove with narratives in terms of moving the human herd in a desired direction.
Not Rastafarian but wants to be
Probably Martian though. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqoZiZbDa0w
Marvin sez...