Online users
- gretavo
|
|
Who's onlineThere are currently 1 user and 19 guests online.
Online users
User loginNavigationFeatured Content WTCD Wiki WTCD Compendium WTCD Podcasts Glossary 9/11 TV News Archive 9/11 Unveiled by Enver Masud David Chandler's YouTube Channel Council for the National Interest Popular Mechanics: Money Masters Orwell Rolls in His Grave Reel Bad Arabs Recent blog posts
WTCD User Comments
|
Excerpts from the Master Plan for a New World Order![]() Manifesto of the Zionist New World Order “True Believers†INTRODUCTION Due to the Protocols mentioning the works of Charles Darwin (d. 1882), Karl Marx (d. 1883), and the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche as ideologies useful for the subversion of the Gentile mind, and because Nietzsche’s writing career was confined to the period of 1883-1888 (he went mad in 1889), the earliest dating of this particular version of the text must be assigned to the 1890s. In August 1921—after the Bolsheviks had overthrown the Russian monarchy with financial support from the House of Rothschild, and the First World War had come to an end—the London Times printed an article by English journalist Philip Graves “exposing†the Protocols as a fraud by citing Joly’s “Dialogues aux Enfers entre Machiavelli et Montesquieu,†which the Times called, “The Geneva Dialogues,†due to its publication in Geneva. The London Times article was itself a propaganda fraud, which was reprinted and sold as a 24-page pamphlet for one shilling. It was entitled, “The Truth About The Protocols.†Of course, now in 2008, with the background of over a century of historical events by which to analyze and verify the game plan found in the Protocols, the words of Henry Ford ring far truer now than when he first spoke them. In an interview published in the New York World, February 17, 1921, Ford remarked: “The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now.†The Protocols in Russian were first published in 1897 by Philip Stepanov for private circulation among an intimate circle of friends. Then Professor Sergius Nilus published them in 1901, and they were then reprinted in 1905. This 1905 edition is in the British Museum and bears the date of its reception as August 10, 1906. All copies that were known to exist in Russia were destroyed during the short-lived regime of Alexander Kerensky in 1917. Under his Bolshevik successors, the possession of a copy by anyone was a crime sufficient to ensure the owners of being arrested and shot. This draconian punishment over the possession of a mere book would seem to indicate the genuine nature of the Protocols. Any time a law is passed to prevent people from reading a book or to punish those doing research into a particular series of historical events, it is a sure sign that somebody doesn’t want the truth about such things to be revealed. The Jewish journals, of course, say that the Protocols are a “forgery,†thereby implying that Professor Sergius Nilus had concocted them for his own “hateful, anti-Semitic†purposes. In the title of this text, the word “protocol†refers to the minutes of the secret proceedings of the learned elders of Zion. They are addressed to the council of Elders by one of its leaders, and these minutes, taken from 24 secret meetings (thus making up 24 Protocols), reveal a covert plan of action developed through the ages by the Elders themselves. Parts and summaries of the plan have been published from time to time over the centuries as the secrets of the Elders have leaked out. The claim of Jewish Zionists that the Protocols are “forgeries†is in itself most probably an admission of their genuineness, for these critics never attempt to answer the facts corresponding to the plans and schemes which the Protocols speak of. Indeed, the correspondence between prophecy and fulfillment is too glaring to be set aside or obscured. This, the Jewish leadership knows well, and therefore tries to evade. WHO ARE THESE ELDERS OF ZION? In 1844, Benjamin Disraeli, whose real name was Israel, and who was a “damped,†or baptized Jew, published his novel, “Coningsby,†in which occurs this ominous passage: “The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.†Disraeli then went on to illustrate that these hidden personages were all Jews, and were working “behind the scenes†of most major Governments. The following text of the Protocols is a modern English rendition of Victor E. Marsden’s early 20th century translation from the original Russian published by Sergius Nilus in 1905. Marsden’s English translation was published most recently in 2006 as “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion†by Filiquarian Publishing, LLC of Minneapolis, Minnesota. The bold text inside square brackets [...] forms my own very abbreviated commentary, and I take full responsibility for its content. Before proceeding, I would also like to mention that during the process of compiling these excerpts for your reading horror and political edification, I also experienced something similar to Victor Marsden when he was working on his translation in the British Museum. He related to his original publisher that he could not bear to work on his translation for more than an hour at a time in the museum, as the diabolical spirit of the matter which he was obliged to turn into English made him positively ill. Though it may have a similar effect on you, as it did on me, it is nonetheless an extremely important text to wrap your mind around, especially in light of the events of the last seven years, as well as the ones we are about to be engulfed by at present. Unfortunately for us, we may be reading this text, and verifying its information, about 50 years too late, but, as the saying goes, better late than never. (The above historical information has been taken from the translator’s Preface and Introduction to The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, Victor E. Marsden (trans.), Minneapolis: Filiquarian Publishing, LLC, 2006.) People are basically evil by nature. The bad people in this world far outnumber the good. So the best form of government is not one that holds reasoned discussions with its people, but one that uses tyranny. Most people would gladly welcome an all-powerful dictator and sacrifice the well-being of others for their own benefit. Freedom is only an ideal: nobody really has it. But if you want to win an election it's good to preach the ideals of freedom, even if you plan to deprive your voters of it. If your opponent believes in the concept of freedom, like a 'Libertarian', use that against him. Because if he foolishly believes in freedom he won't be willing to use the underhanded tactics that you do. He will play fair while you fight dirty. Any government that is based on freedom loses control over its people. This is a terrible thing because remember that people are basically bad and the only way to guide them is by force. If a government is guided by freedom the people will become weak. We can take advantage of that weakness to overpower them and install a new government. GOLD AS THE NEW RELIGION Once a nation is engaged in civil war it will either destroy itself or be weakened to the point where it can be overtaken by another foreign power. In either case, our job will be done, as they’ll no longer be a threat to us. If that nation ends up in bankruptcy we’ll offer to loan them some of our money. They’ll have no option but to take it. If anyone claims that the above is immoral, let me ask them this – Suppose a nation has two enemies: an external enemy which is a neighboring nation; and an internal enemy represented by political rivals who might try to overthrow the nation from within. Well, if it is acceptable to destroy the other nation without any regard to morals, then why should it not also be acceptable to destroy the internal enemy? After all, it’s the more dangerous of the two and the more likely to succeed in destroying society. Politics has nothing to do with morals. Anyone who tries to govern according to morals is a moron and unsuitable for office. A true politician must resort to cunning and lies if he expects to get anywhere. Great qualities such as honesty and integrity are a burden for any ruler. Anyone in politics who decides to start behaving like this – their career will be over before they know it. Most Goyim believe that their rulers should have these qualities; but of course, we know better. MIGHT IS RIGHT What is a right? Where does it begin and end? If a ruler starts granting rights, then everyone will start demanding new rights, especially libertarians. Soon the nation will be overrun with rights and the ruler will look stupid. From this I conclude that there is only one right: the right of the strong over the weak. It gives a ruler the power to do whatever he wants, and to become supreme lord over those libertarian people who had better give up their rights to him voluntarily. Our method of gaining power is better than any other because it grows invisibly. Then when it has gained enough strength, we can unleash it; and it will be unstoppable because no one will be prepared for it. We need to do a lot of evil things in order to gain power. But that’s okay because once we have power over everything we can use it to do good things; like running the nations properly. We could never do that if we gave people freedom. The end justifies the means. So let’s put aside moral issues and focus on the end result. We have a good long-range plan here and we can’t afford to deviate from it. Otherwise all our work over the centuries would have been for nothing. Only someone trained from childhood to serve as a leader can truly understand politics. [get ‘em while their still young and corruptible, cf. the NWO component known as the Rhodes scholarship program] WE ARE DESPOTS Our modus operandi is: Force and Make-Believe. Only force gives you power, especially in the hands of a smooth-talker. Violence and deception must be the rule for any politician who wants to remain in power. This may be considered evil, but remember, evil is justified when it is used to achieve good. Therefore we must not stop at bribery, deceit and treachery if they help us attain our end goal. In politics we must know how to seize the property of others without hesitation if it allows us to gain full power over them. WE SHALL END LIBERTY Thanks to stupid libertarians, the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity" have spread to all corners of the earth. These words installed peace, quiet and solidarity throughout all Goyim of the earth, and thus weakened their strength. As you will see later, this helped us to our victory: it gave us the possibility of getting our hands on the masterstroke – the destruction of privileges and power of their royalty. That royal class was the only defense the Goyim had against us. On the ruins of the eternal and heir-based aristocracy of the Goyim we have set up the aristocracy of our educated class headed by the aristocracy of money. The entry qualifications to this aristocracy are based on wealth (which is dependent upon us) and on knowledge, which also comes from us, especially from our learned elders who have provided much inspiration. Our victory has been made easier by the fact that whenever we sought favors from men in power we always appealed to their most basic of desires. Like cash-money and all kinds of material goodies. Even one human weakness is often enough to pass control of these men over to those offering the bribes. The concept of freedom has enabled us to convince the people of all countries that their government is a servant of the people, that the people are the true owners of the country and that that servant can be replaced like a worn-out glove. This possibility of replacing the representatives of the people gives us the power to appoint a new government. Whenever we start a war, we shouldn’t do so for the purpose of gaining territory; at least not as a general rule. Instead we should do it for economic gains. This way everyone will see how powerful we are; and they will be in fear of our many international spies and agents who roam the earth without limitation. National rights will then be wiped out by our international rights, which are the proper sense of right – the right of force. We will then rule the nations in the same way that the nations rule their citizens. The people chosen by us to act as rulers of a nation will not be those trained in the art of leadership. Instead we’ll select them based on their capacity to take orders. They’ll be puppets under the control of smart men who will be their advisers: specialists bred and reared from early childhood to rule the affairs of the whole world. As you well know, these specialists of ours have been trained to get the information they need from our political plans, from the lessons of history, and from observations made of current events. The Goyim are not guided by observations of history, but by theories on how the world is supposed to work. They don’t bother to check whether those theories are true or not. So don’t trouble yourself with them. Let them amuse themselves until the final hour strikes, in their utopian beliefs, in entertainments, or on the memories of all they have enjoyed. Let them organize their beliefs around scientific theories. We are constantly using our media to encourage the Goyim to have blind confidence in these theories. The intellectuals of the Goyim will fill their minds with this scientific knowledge without questioning its validity or usefulness. Our agent specialists have carefully determined what type of knowledge the intellectuals receive, and in this way we can steer their minds in the direction we want. DESTRUCTIVE EDUCATION It is vital that we take into account the thoughts, characters and cultural tendencies of the nations in order that we avoid making mistakes in the takeover of their political and administrative affairs. In order for us to succeed, we must adjust our methods to accommodate for the cultural and regional differences of nations. Similarly, if a culture should change over time, we must change our methods to suit. [Thus the need for universities to have international studies departments for ‘agent-infiltrator info-training’ and cultural intel gathering, i.e. “research papers.â€] The Media has a great influence on people’s thoughts. It was previously in the hands of sovereign governments, but is now under our control. Our Media’s role is to convince people that our plans are important, and to allow them to express some dissatisfaction which will help create discontent. The Media can be a powerful force for freedom of speech. But Goyim don’t know how to use this force so it always falls into our hands. Through the Media we have gained the power of influence while remaining invisible. Thanks to the Media we now have the Gold in our hands. Mind you, we also needed to use an awful lot of violence and underhanded tactics to achieve this. But it was worth it, even though we had to sacrifice many of our own people. In the eyes of God [i.e. the Zionist-Masonic deity called Shaitan/Satan], one Jew is worth a thousand Goyim. I have some good news. We’re only a few steps away from our goal. There’s a small way to go, but when we get there, we’ll have achieved the closing of our Symbolic Snake. This Snake represents the spreading of our people across Europe. When the Snake closes into a loop, the whole of Europe will be locked in its constricting coils. The constitutions of the various nations will soon break down. For we have designed them with a certain lack of accurate balance: such that their component verses grind against each other to the point where the whole constitution falls apart. Goyim are under the impression that those verses are welded strongly together and any discrepancies between them should balance out over time. But their monarchs, who might enforce that welding, are surrounded by representatives who play the role of fools lusting for uncontrolled and irresponsible power. The monarchs owe their power to the terror that has been breathed into their palaces. As they no longer have direct access to their people, the kings on their thrones are not able to come to terms with them, and cannot strengthen themselves against those who seek to take their power.
We have created a rift between the far-sighted Sovereign Power and the blind force of the people, such that both have lost their effectiveness. For like the blind man and his stick, they are powerless apart. In order to incite those who seek power to misuse that power, we have caused all political forces to turn against one other. This breaks up their libertarian desires toward seeking independence. To this end we have stirred up every political, social and minority group. We have armed all sides. We have labeled authority as a target for every ambition. We have turned parliaments into gladiatorial arenas where many confused issues brawl. With a bit more of this, disorders and bankruptcy will be universal. Parliaments and Administrative Boards have been turned into oratorical contests of inexhaustible babblers. Unscrupulous journalists descend upon executive officials daily. Abuses of power will be the final touch in preparing all institutions for their overthrow. Everything will then fall to pieces under the attacks of angry mobs. WE SUPPORT COMMUNISM We appear on the scene as alleged saviors of the worker from this oppression. Then we propose that he join the ranks of our fighting forces – Socialists, Anarchists, Communists – to whom we always give support in accordance with an alleged brotherly rule (of the solidarity of all humanity) of our social Masonry. The aristocracy, which lawfully enjoyed the labor of the workers, was interested in seeing that the workers were well fed, healthy, and strong. We are interested in just the opposite – in the decline and killing of the Goyim. Our power is in the chronic shortness of food and physical weakness of the worker, because by this, he will become our slave. He will have neither the strength nor the energy to oppose us. Hunger surely gives us more authority to rule the worker than the legal authority given to the aristocracy by the rule of kings. [see: the modern day war against ‘Heritage’ seeds, the anti-herb and vitamin laws, the GMO crop manipulations, eugenically designed vaccines, technologically based weather manipulations to cause crop shortages and massive crop failures, the irradiation of food, as well as the famine-inducing, ‘Corn-to-Ethanol’ hoax designed by the Bilderberg-psychos, and supported by NWO shills, liars, and Zio-globalist whores like Al Gore, who “invented†the internet, basically, to gather information about you and yours.] We will highlight the differences of wealth between the rich and the poor. The emotions of envy and hatred which will then arise in the poor, due to their want of the wealth, will be whipped into mob frenzy. Through their hands we shall wipe out all those who hinder us on our way [an illustration of the Zio-demon as perennial social and political provocateur]. When the hour strikes for our sovereign lord of the entire world [the 666 Demon] to be crowned, it is these same hands which will sweep away everything that might be a hindrance to that. The Goyim have lost the habit of thinking unless prompted by the suggestions of our specialists. Therefore they do not see the urgent necessity of what we, when our kingdom comes, shall adopt at once. Namely that it is essential to teach in national schools one simple, true piece of knowledge, the basis of all knowledge, and the knowledge of the structure of human life, which is that: Social existence requires division of labor, and consequently, the division of men into classes and conditions. It is essential for all to know that owing to differences in the occupations of humans, there cannot be any equality among them. Someone that commits an act that compromises a whole class cannot be held as equally responsible before the law, as compared to someone who affects only himself. The true knowledge of the structure of society – secrets which we keep from the Goyim – would reveal that positions of work must correspond with the education that was given to a worker. Otherwise they might suffer. After a thorough study of this knowledge, people will voluntarily submit to authority and accept whatever position is given to them in the State. The people blindly believe what they read in print, and given their present state of ignorance, they possess a sense of blind hatred toward anyone who has more wealth, or lives in better condition than themselves. They have no understanding of the purpose of social classes. JEWS WILL BE SAFE “Ours†they will not touch, because the moment of attack will be known to us and we shall take measures to protect our own. When the population realizes that the utopia of communism is not ‘as advertised’, and that all those promises of freedom and indulgences of wealth they imagined are not there, they will find themselves stuck like a blind man on a host of stumbling blocks. The Goyim people suffer patiently under the abuses of the worst dictators, even while those dictators would have beheaded twenty of their kings. The word "freedom" brings out the communities of men to fight against every kind of force, against every kind of authority even against God and the laws of nature. For this reason we, when we finally step into our kingdom, shall have to erase this word from the language of life; implying that freedom is a principle of brute force which turns mobs into bloodthirsty beasts. Every republic passes through several stages. The first of these is the early days of mad raging by the blind mob, tossed here and there, to and fro. The second is demagogy which leads to anarchy and that inevitably leads to despotism. This is not a legal and observable, and therefore responsible, type of despotism. Rather it’s a hidden form of despotism that’s in the hands of some secret organization. This organization is unscrupulous because it works behind the backs of the people using agents who have no accountability, and who don’t serve the people, only the organization. These agents are continually changing and this benefits the organization because it doesn’t have give them special rewards for long times in service. Who or what has the ability to overthrow an invisible force? Because that is precisely what our Force is. Gentile-based Freemasonry serves as a smokescreen for us and our plans. But the plan of action of our Force, even its very existence, remains an unknown mystery to the people. WE SHALL DESTROY GOD The intensified struggle for superiority and the shocks delivered to economic life will create, no, have already created, disenchanted, cold and heartless communities. Such communities will lose interest in, and foster a strong aversion toward sound political management and religion. Their only guide will be that of monetary gain, i.e. gold, which they will erect into a bona fide cult for the sake of those material delights which it can give. Then a day of reckoning will come when, not for the sake of righteousness, not even to win wealth, but solely out of hatred towards those privileged, the lower classes of the Goyim will follow our lead and rise against our rivals for power: the intellectuals of the Goyim. What form of administrative rule can be given to communities in which corruption has penetrated everywhere; communities where riches are obtained only by the clever surprise tactics of con artists; where looseness reigns; where morality is maintained, not by voluntarily accepted principles, but by harsh laws and strong enforcement; where feelings towards religion and country are obligated only by fashionable persuasions? What form of rule is to be given to these communities other than that despotism which I shall describe to you later? We shall create a strong central government in order to gain a stranglehold on those communities. We shall thoroughly regulate all aspects of the public life of our subjects with new laws. These laws will withdraw, one by one, all the privileges and freedoms which have been permitted to the Goyim; and our kingdom will be distinguished by a despotism of such magnificent proportions that, at any moment and in every place, it will be in a position to wipe out any Goyim who dares to oppose us, either in words or by actions. MASSES LED BY LIES For a time perhaps, we might be successfully dealt with by a coalition of the Goyim of the entire world. But we are protected from this danger by the discord existing among them. Their loyalties to their own separate groups, races and classes are now so deeply ingrained that they can never be removed. We have set one against another: the personal and national beliefs of the Goyim, religious and race hatreds, which we have fostered into a huge growth in the course of the past twenty centuries. This is the reason why there is not one State which would anywhere receive support if it were to raise its arm, for every one of them must bear in mind that any agreement against us would be unprofitable to itself. We are too strong – there is no evading our power. The nations cannot come to even an inconsiderable private agreement without our secretly having a hand in it [cf. John Carpenter’s film “They Liveâ€] “Per me Reges regnant†is Latin for: “It is through me that Kings reign.†And it was said by the prophets that we were chosen by God Himself to rule over the whole earth. God has endowed us with genius so that we may do this task. If genius was in an opposing camp it would still struggle against us, but even so, a newcomer is no match for the old-established settler: the struggle would be merciless between us, such a fight as the world has never seen. Yes, and the genius on their side would have arrived too late. All the wheels of the machinery of all States go via the force of the engine, which is in our hands. And that engine of the machinery of States is - Gold. The science of political economy invented by our learned elders has placed great value on the importance of money-capital for such a long time.

 MONOPOLY CAPITAL Throughout history, the people of the world have accepted campaign promises at face value. Those people are content with a show and rarely pause to check afterward whether the promises have been kept. The same holds true for individuals outside the political arena. Therefore we shall establish ‘Show’ institutions which will give eloquent ‘proof’ of their benefit to progress. We shall assume to ourselves to represent the voice of freedom of all parties, of all directions,... In order to put public opinion into our hands we must bring it into a state of bewilderment by broadcasting so many contradictory opinions from all sides and for such a long time that it will make the Goyim lose their heads in a maze of confusion. They will come to realize that the best thing is to have no opinion of any kind in political matters, especially when it is intended that the public should not understand the issues being discussed. In that way the Goyim will leave the opinions and understanding of the issues to those who guide the public. This is the first secret. [and this is exactly why the majority of the “experts†and “guest pundits†on ALL TV news and commentary shows are Jews.] The second secret necessity for the success of our government consists of the following: To emphasize the national failings of bad habits, misplaced passions, and troubling conditions of everyday life, to such an extent that it will be impossible for anyone to know where he is in the resulting chaos [These servants of the god of darkness are true devotees of Chaos and provocateurs of disorder, cf. Mark Cohen’s “Re-create ’68,†etc.]. As a result, the people will fail to understand one another. This measure will also serve us in another way, namely, to sow discord in all parties, to dislocate all collective forces which are still unwilling to submit to us, and to discourage any kind of personal initiative which might hinder our affairs in any way. There is nothing more dangerous than personal initiative: if it has genius behind it, such initiative can do more harm than can be done by millions of people among whom we have sown discord....The strain which results from lack of achievement saps the spirit when compared side-by-side with the accomplishment of a successful person. From this comparison arises grave moral shocks, disenchantments and failures. By all these means we shall so wear down the Goyim that they will be compelled to offer us international power of a nature that by its position will enable us without any violence gradually to absorb all the state forces of the world and to form a super-government. In place of the rulers of today we shall set up a monstrosity called the Super-Government Administration. Its tentacles will reach out in all directions like grappling hooks and its organization will be of such colossal dimensions that it cannot fail to subdue all the nations of the world. We shall soon begin to establish huge monopolies, reservoirs of colossal riches, upon which even large fortunes of the Goyim will depend to such an extent that they will go to the bottom together with the credit of the States on the day after the political crash. The aristocracy of the Goyim as a political force is dead. We need not take it into account. But as landed proprietors they can still be harmful to us from the fact that they are self-sufficient in the resources upon which they live. It is essential therefore for us at whatever cost to deprive them of their land. This object will be best attained by increasing the burdens upon landed property – by loading lands with debts. These measures will reduce land ownership and keep it in a state of humble and unconditional submission. WE SHALL ENSLAVE THE GENTILES To complete the ruin of the industry of the Goyim we shall bring, to the assistance of speculation, the luxury which we have encouraged among the Goyim: that greedy demand for luxury which is swallowing up everything. We shall raise the rate of wages. However this will not bring any advantage to the workers, because at the same time, we shall also cause a rise in prices of items that are essential to life. We shall claim that these increases were caused by a decline in agriculture and cattle breeding. We shall, craftily and thoroughly, further undermine sources of production, by accustoming the workers to anarchy and to drunkenness. Additionally, we shall take all measures to uproot all the educated forces of the Goyim from the face of the earth. In order that the true meaning of things is not discovered by the Goyim before the proper time, we shall mask it under an alleged enthusiastic desire to serve the working classes and the great principles of political economy, which our economic theories carry with much energetic propaganda. The increase in size of the military, police forces, and of their armaments, are all essential for the completion of the above plans. The situation we need to arrive at is that the populations of the world’s nations consist of only: (1) ourselves; (2) the masses of the working class; (3) a few millionaires devoted to our interests; and (4) police and soldiers. UNIVERSAL WAR The main factor of success in politics is to operate in secrecy. A diplomat must say one thing but then do another [they are servants of the God of Lies and Treachery]. We must compel the governments of the Goyim to take action in the direction favored by our well thought-out plan, which is nearing completion, by what we shall claim is public opinion. This ‘opinion’ will be secretly promoted by us through the means of that so-called "Great Power" – the media, which, apart from a few unimportant exceptions, is already entirely in our hands. In order to display our system of keeping the governments of the Goyim in Europe in check, we shall show our strength by committing terrorist attacks against one of them [cf. 9/11, 7/7, the Madrid train bombings, and the one they are planning to launch in the next few months]. If the governments of Europe should collectively rise against us, we shall respond using the military might of America or China or Japan. [At this very moment, there is a very real, and very dangerous, internal enemy inside America which operates from a ‘Satanic’ or demonic level of consciousness, and follows a blueprint or game plan much like the one being described in this century old text. This enemy is NOT your friend and is NOT your ally, and never was one from the start (cf. 1954’s Operation Susannah, 1967’s attack on the U.S.S. Liberty, 9/11, Israeli snipers murdering U.S. troops in Iraq, etc., etc.). This enemy is a thief, a deceiver, and a liar. This enemy is a parasite in the true sense of the word, and wants to kill you, your country, and your Faiths (both Christianity and Islam). It is time for the end of your naivete. It is time for the Goyim-sheeple-cattle to get their heads up off the grass and wake up to this Grand Deception, this Grand Treachery before it is too late, and the hour of this demon’s final takedown is already upon us. It is time to turn on the kitchen light of Truth and Free, Uncensored Speech, and watch the roaches scatter. They call this “hate speech†because they just “hate†having all their deceptions and crimes being fully exposed and called out. They will not have their kingdom and we will not bow down to them. We do not fear them or their Satanic Master. We fear only G-d.] We must arm ourselves with all the weapons which our opponents might use against us [by either stealing them from the Pentagon, or petulantly demanding that the U.S. turn over all top-secret weapons systems in development to them, so that their base of operations (Israhell) can be safe from rock throwing Palestinian kids and Muslim schoolgirls]. We need to make our actions look valid and proper from a legal view-point [ALWAYS with the public relations concerns]. Occasionally we’ll pronounce judgments that might appear biased or unjust. So we need to brush up on our legal-poetry to make our arguments sound convincing because it’s important that we get our judgments passed [cf. the Israeli-controlled, U.S. congress and senate]. We will use expressions that sound like the most exalted moral principles converted into a legal form. Our directors must surround themselves with everyone that they need to do their work. They will surround themselves with publicists, practical jurists, administrators, diplomats and, finally, with persons prepared by a special super-educational training in our special schools. These persons will have a clear understanding of the secrets of how society works; they will understand the special language of politics, and how that language can be manipulated; they will be made acquainted with the whole underside of human nature, with all its weaknesses and sensitive ‘chords’ upon which they will need to play. These chords represent the mind-set of the Goyim; their tendencies, shortcomings, vices and qualities, and the particularities of their classes and conditions. Needless to say, that the talented assistants of authority, of whom I speak, will not be selected from among the Goyim, who are accustomed to doing their administrative work without ever troubling themselves to think about what it’s for, or why it’s needed. The administrators of the Goyim sign papers without reading them. These administrators serve us either for their pay or for personal ambition. 
For the time being, until we get to the point where there is no longer any risk in entrusting responsible positions in our State to our brother-Jews, we shall put them in the hands of persons who have a criminal past and have shown little regard for the welfare of the people. Persons who, if they disobey our instructions, must face criminal charges or disappear. In this way we will make them defend our interests to their last gasp. [In this regard, the existence of a fake, or Zionist controlled and dominated, 9/11 “truth†movement is an illustration of the above, and it functions as another means of putting pressure on high-level, Goy puppets like Bush and Cheney, et al. It is a display of grassroots populism covertly controlled, and is a sword of Damocles demonstration that, if these complicitous political frontmen get out of line, the fake 9/11 truth movement—with its emphasis on Muslim hijackers and the Bush-Cheney crowd allowing their Saudi friends to attack America to start wars for oil—will begin getting a lot more serious Zio-media coverage/discussion, and there will be a “new, unbiased investigation†into 9/11, which the Zionist-controlled fake truth movement “leaders†will “handle,†and which will lead, of course, to Bushco going to prison (not Silverstein, Lowey, or Eisenberg, et al.); the blame for global terror will still be assigned to the “evil, Muslim world (in order to keep the “War on Terror†franchise going); and Israel (the primary terrorist perpetrator) will be “officially†exonerated, as they were in the first fake investigation of 9/11. The fake, Zionist-puppet 9/11 truth movement exists, and is funded, in order to ultimately protect Israel, and it exists as a final rampart at the far edge of a well-orchestrated limited intel hangout. 9/11 Blogger, like Amy Goodman, is also a gatekeeping operation, and should perhaps change its website title to “Government Attorneys for Fake 9/11 Truth.â€] In applying our principles, take note of the character of the people in whose country you live and act. We must adjust our methods to suit because a general, identical application of our principles to all cultures cannot succeed – at least not until the people have been re-educated to conform to our pattern. But by approaching their application cautiously you will see that, in less than a decade, even the most stubborn character will change and we shall add a new people to the ranks of those already subdued by us. THE JEWISH SUPER-STATE We have fooled, bemused and corrupted the youth of the Goyim by rearing them in principles and theories which are known to us to be false, and we have taught this through repetition. OUR GOAL: WORLD POWER
[attained through the Method of Creating a Crisis to Provoke a Reaction, and then Stepping in with a Pre-planned “Solutionâ€] When we have accomplished our government overthrow we shall then say to the various peoples: “Everything has gone terribly wrong. Everyone has been worn out with suffering. We are destroying the causes of your torment – nationalities, borders, different currencies. You are free, of course, to pronounce sentence upon us, but can it possibly be a just one if you pronounce it before you properly try out what we are offering you?†Then the mob will praise us and give us their support in a unanimous triumph of hopes and expectations. Voting, which we have made the instrument that will set us on the throne of the world by teaching even the very smallest units of members of the human race to vote by means of meetings and agreements by groups, will then have served its purposes and will play its part then for the last time by a unanimity of desire to make close acquaintance with us before condemning us. A scheme of government should come ready made from one brain, because it will never be clinched firmly if it is allowed to be split into fractional parts in the minds of many. It is allowable, therefore, for us to have knowledge of the scheme of action but not to discuss it lest we disturb its cunning, the interdependence of its component parts, and the practical force behind the secret meaning of each clause. To discuss and make alterations in this manner by means of much voting gives those alterations the appearance of have being arrived at by the process of logical and methodical reasoning. And any misunderstandings of these alterations will prevent the public from seeing into the next connected link of our scheme. We want our schemes to be forcible and suitably devised. Therefore we ought not to let our well thought-out plans be revealed to the public as a whole or even to a select group of them. These schemes will not turn existing institutions upside down just yet. They will only effect changes in their economy and consequently in the whole combined movement of their progress, which will then be directed along the paths laid down in our schemes. Soon we shall assign the duties of presidents. By that time we shall be in a position to disregard the procedures normally required to accomplish our necessary tasks because our impersonal puppet will be able do it directly. [And these wars will all be fought for the benefit of Zionist imperial goals and/or the interests of the Rothschild-Bauer-dominated, global “Central Banking System†(the CBS).] It should be easy to understand that under these conditions, the ‘magic lamp’ will be in our hands, and no one other than us will, any longer, have control over determining legislation. [See: the modern, no muss, no fuss, U.S. congressional method of having AIPAC agents write the legislation for them. Any compromised, Goy fool with a law degree can do this gig. If you’re a congress “person,†all ya gotta do is show up and vote “YES†on the AIPAC-written legislation, and then hit the golf course in the afternoon. As Congress “person†John Conyers once mentioned, “Son, we don’t actually read this stuff.†We have better things to do like drinking all day, cheating on our wives, and arranging illegal weapons deals with Israeli puppet states and Rwandan guerillas.] Besides this we shall, with the introduction of the new republican constitution, take from the Chamber the right of inserting new legislation on government measures, on the pretext of preserving national security,... The president will, at our discretion, interpret the meaning of existing laws and point out that there are already various interpretations of them; he will further annul them when we indicate to him the necessity to do so. Besides this, he will have the right to propose temporary laws, and even new departures in the government’s constitutional working [cf. the Zionist-controlled Bush administration]. The pretext for doing both these things will be the requirements for the supreme welfare of the State. [such as protecting the people from being attacked by crazed, bloodthirsty Islamo-fascist suicide pilots, who are the real ones trying to take over the world and impose on us their Sharia laws due to intense hatred of “our freedoms.â€] WE SHALL DESTROY But you yourselves know perfectly well that to produce the possibility of the expression of such wishes by all the nations, it is necessary to trouble the people’s relations with their governments in all countries to such a degree that it will utterly exhaust humanity with dissension, hatred, struggle, envy, and even by the use of torture, by starvation, by the spreading of diseases, or extreme poverty. As a result of this, the Goyim will see no other solution than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty, in our money and in all else that we offer [such as 3,000 cable channels of complete nonsense and garbage]. This is now the program of the new constitution. We shall make Laws, Rights and Justice: (1) in the form of proposals to the Legislative Corps, (2) by decrees of the president under the guise of general regulations, (3) by orders of the Senate (4) by resolutions of the State Council in the guise of ministerial orders, (5) and in case a suitable occasion should arise – in the form of a revolution within the State. WE ARE WOLVES God [or a dark approximation thereof] has granted to us, His Chosen People, the gift of spreading ourselves widely throughout the world. To most people this appears to be our weakness. But as it happens, this has brought forth our strength [in the ‘dual-loyalty’ sayanim espionage system of global sedition and treason] and we are now on the threshold of sovereignty over the entire world. [Oh Happy Happy, Joy Joy!] There is not much remaining for us to do in terms of building up the foundation which we have laid for our plans. [except, perhaps ramming two remote controlled Boeings into Larry Silverstein’s two towers in New York, and making three of his buildings fall at ‘free fall’ (due to well-placed, magical camp fires), only to be covered up later by traitor, government scientists whoring for a criminally run, illegitimate government.] [Freedom is just another word to parse and manipulate] The word “freedom†which can be interpreted in various ways, is defined by us as follows: Freedom is the right to do what the law allows. This interpretation of the word will, at the proper time, be of service to us because all freedom will then be in our hands; since the laws will abolish or create only what is desirable for us according to the above-mentioned program. We shall deal with the media in the following way: What is the role played by the media today? It sometimes serves to excite and inflame those passions which are needed for our purpose, and at other times it serves the selfish desires of other parties.
It is often bland, unjust, dishonest, and the majority of the public haven’t the slightest idea what purpose the media really serves. We shall saddle and bridle it with a tight chain. We shall also do the same with all other productions of the printing press; for what would be the sense of getting rid of attacks from newspapers if we remain targets via pamphlets and books? The output of the media is nowadays a source of heavy expense owing to the necessity of censoring it. We will turn it into a very lucrative source of income to our State by laying a special stamp tax on it and requiring deposits of caution-money before permitting any new media companies from being established. They will then be required to guarantee our government against any kind of attack from their media. For any attempt to attack us (if that’s still possible) we shall inflict fines without mercy. Such measures as stamp tax, deposit of caution-money and fines secured by these deposits, will bring in a huge income to the government. It is true that political groups which have money to spare might still attack us for the sake of publicity regardless of these fines. But these we shall shut up at the second attack upon us. No one shall lay a finger on the aura of our government’s infallibility without being punished. The pretext for stopping any publication will be the alleged plea that it is agitating the public mind without good reason or at an inappropriate time. I beg you to note that among those making attacks upon us will also be entities established by us; but they will only attack points of our plan which we have already decided to alter. WE CONTROL THE MEDIA We have effectively taken possession of the minds of the Goy communities to such an extent that they have all come to look upon the events of the world through the colored glasses which we have placed on their noses. Already now, there is not a single State which has barriers preventing us from gaining access to what Goyim stupidity calls “State secrets.†What will our positions be when we are acknowledged as supreme lords of the world, and have one of our persons as the king of all the world? FREE PRESS DESTROYED We will divide our media components into three layers or ranks: In the SECOND RANK will be the semi-official publications, whose part it will be to normally support us and sometimes criticize us, but only over issues of lukewarm importance. In the THIRD RANK we shall set up what looks like our own opposing camp, which, in at least one of its publications, will present what looks like the very enemy of us. Our REAL opponents at heart will accept this simulated opposition as their own and will reveal their identities and plans to us. [i.e. Move to Prothink Town: Bring all your weapons, IDs, and your women, because you can never have enough women and weapons when you’re fighting the Jooz]. Our newspapers will be of all possible complexions – aristocratic, republican, revolutionary, even anarchical – for only as long, of course, as the constitution exists. Like the Indian idol “Vishnu†they will have a hundred hands, and every one of them will have a finger on any one of the public opinions as required. When an emotive issue arises, these hands will lead opinion in the direction of our aims; for an excited person loses all power of judgment and easily yields to suggestion. Those fools who will think they are repeating the opinion of a newspaper of their own camp will actually be repeating our opinion or any opinion that seems desirable for us. In the vain belief that they are following the ideology of their party they will, in fact, be following the flag that we have hung out for them. These attacks upon us will also serve another purpose, namely, that our subjects will be convinced of the existence of full freedom of speech and this gives our agents an occasion to claim that all publications which oppose us are empty babblers, since they are incapable of finding any substantial objections to our orders. ONLY LIES PRINTED Trial shots like these, fired by us in the third rank of our press, will, when necessary, be energetically refuted by us in our semi-official publications [Welcome to the lying, demonic Zio-Nazi sock puppet show. It’s all lies, all the time, brought to you by our sponsor - the forked tongue of the Khazarian serpent, the Fallen ones, the nephalim]. Even nowadays, already, to take only the French press as an example, there are groups which reveal Masonic-like solidarity in acting together on the ‘important issues’: all people of the media are bound together by professional secrecy; and like the priests of ancient Rome, not one of them will give away the secret of his sources of information unless the group agrees upon it. Not one journalist will venture to betray this secret, for not one of them is ever admitted to practice journalism unless his whole past has some dark and disgraceful secret in it. For if he did, these secrets would be immediately revealed. So long as they remain the secret of a few, the prestige of the journalist allows him to attack the majority of the country – and the mob will follow after him with enthusiasm [or torches and pitchforks]. When we are in the period of the new regime, but prior to the assumption of our full sovereignty, we must not allow any revelation by the media to admit to any form of public dishonesty. It is necessary that the new regime should be thought to have so perfectly contended everybody that even criminality has disappeared. Occurrences of criminality should remain known only to the victims and to chance witnesses – no one else. We need the Goyim to keep silent and be our humble servants. When we hire Goyim to work at our media companies, we might order them to discuss things which are inconvenient for us to discuss directly via our official documents. They will raise a din of discussion and create a distraction which will allow us to quietly introduce the laws we want and then present them to the public as an accomplished fact. No one will dare to demand the cancellation of a law that we’ve put forth, especially since it will be presented as an improvement. And immediately afterward, the media will distract the current of thought towards new issues [like Britney’s nipple rings and drinking problem, or a congressman caught in a honey-pot sting]. After all, haven’t we trained people always to be seeking something new? The brainless dispensers of opinions and forecasts will then throw themselves into the discussions of these new issues. Even now those people are not able to understand that they don’t have the remotest conception about the matters which they have chosen to discuss. Political issues are incomprehensible to all except those who have guided it already for many ages; namely, the creators of our philosophy [Zio-Satanism]. WE DECEIVE WORKERS The part played by the libertarians and utopian dreamers [“I have a dream that one day the apartheid Nazi state of Israhell will vanish from the face of the Earth by the hand of G-d Himselfâ€] will finally come to an end when our government is acknowledged. Up until that time they will continue to do us good service. Therefore we shall continue to direct their minds to all sorts of vain conceptions of fantastic theories that are new and apparently progressive: For we have completely and successfully attracted the brainless minds of the Goyim with the pursuit of progress, to the point where there is not one Goyim mind able to perceive that under this word lies a departure from truth in all cases. With the exception of material inventions, progress is an illusory idea which serves to obscure truth. Nobody knows this truth except us, the Chosen of [the] God [of Lies and Darkness], and we are its [Satanic] guardians. When we finally come into our kingdom our orators will talk about the great problems which had turned humanity upside down, and how these problems were brought to an end under our beneficent rule. Who will ever suspect then [aside from all the millions of angry people who will be reading these Protocols on the internet tubes of the future] that all these peoples were stage-managed by us according to a political plan which no one has so much as guessed at in the course of many centuries? [until now!] WE SHALL FORBID CHRIST At the same time we shall not forget to emphasize the historical mistakes of the Goy governments [see: Sumner Redstone’s (Murray Rothstein’s) “Daily Show,†Naomi Klein’s books, etc., etc.] which have tormented humanity for so many centuries by their lack of understanding of everything that constitutes the true good of humanity in their pursuit of ill-conceived schemes of socialist blessings... Our philosophers will discuss all the shortcomings of the various beliefs of the Goyim, but no one will ever bring our [Satanic] faith from its true point of view under discussion since this will be fully learned only by ourselves and we will never dare to betray its secrets. In countries known as progressive and enlightened we have created senseless, filthy, abominable literature [see: the Jewish dominated pornography industry and the 1920s culture sewer of the post-WWI, Weimar Republic in Germany]. For some time after our entrance to power we shall continue to encourage its existence in order to provide some relief in contrast to the speeches and party politics which will be distributed from our grandiose quarters. Our wise men, trained to become leaders of the Goyim, will compose speeches, presentations, memoirs and articles. These will be used by us to influence the minds of the Goyim, directing them towards certain types of knowledge and conclusions which have been determined by us. We shall come into our kingdom by the aid of a sudden overthrow of a government; done by our small group and carried out everywhere at once and all within a single day. It may be a while before this takes place, perhaps even a whole century. But when at last this definitely happens, and has been definitely acknowledged, we shall make it our job to see that things such as plots against us shall no longer exist. With this purpose, we shall slay without mercy all who take up arms to oppose our coming into our kingdom. Every kind of new institution which is anything like a secret society will also be punished with death. Those of them which are now in existence are known to us – they serve us and have served us. We shall dissolve these and send their members into exile to continents far removed from Europe. In this way we shall deal with those Goy Masons who know too much; some of whom we may spare for some reason, and they will be kept in constant fear of exile.
We shall formally declare a law making all former members of secret societies liable to exile from Europe which will be the center of our rule. SECRET SOCIETIES
 The classes of people who most willingly enter into secret societies are those who live by their wits, the career-seeking types, and in general, mostly light-minded people, with whom we shall have no difficulty in dealing with and in using to wind up the mechanism of the machine devised by us. If this world grows agitated, it is because we have had to stir it up in order to break up its too great solidarity. But if a plot should arise in its midst, then the person in charge of that plot will be none other than one of our most trusted servants [cf. the Richard Cheney demon]. It is natural that no one else other than us should lead Masonic activities, for we know where we are heading; we know the final goal of every type of activity. Whereas the Goyim have knowledge of nothing; not even of the immediate effect of an action. They usually only consider the momentary satisfaction which comes from the accomplishment of their thoughts. They don’t notice that their thoughts didn’t arise from their own initiative but from ideas which we planted in their heads [cf. the modern, mainstream corporate Zio-media monopoly and the emotional, make-believe propaganda of Hollywoodberg. Kill your TV and boycott the products of Hollywood!]. GENTILES ARE STUPID GENTILES ARE CATTLE Everyone has to die someday [even the accursed members of the Biblically described “Synagogue of Satan,†i.e. the Israeli Knesset]. So it is better that those who hinder our affairs die much sooner than us since we are the founders of this [Demonic] plan. We execute masons in such a clever way that no one other than us, the brotherhood, can ever suspect anything – not even the victims of our death sentence. They all die when required as if from natural causes. Knowing this, even the brotherhood dare not protest. Using these methods we have removed the very root of protest against our management style out of the midst of the Masonry. While preaching liberalism to the Goy, at the same time we keep our own people and our agents in a state of unquestioning submission. [The Zionist-New World Order = The Satanic New World Order. Do not be fooled by their charming bullshit and ‘innocent victim’ act. The Satanic entity always appears as a charming, well-educated, cultured liar and con-artist, hence the moniker “God of Lies and Deception.â€] Of course, we carry out our work via persons who are our tools and these people do not appear to have anything in common with us – e.g. by using newspaper opinions or by other means. Even senators [cf. Joseph Biden who, by claiming Iraqi Jewish ancestry, was able to vote in the last Iraqi general election!] and the higher administration accept our opinions and ideas. The undeveloped mind of the Goyim is incapable of doing analysis and observation, and even less capable of predicting whereby a certain manner of wording a law may lead. Based on this difference in capacity for thought between the Goyim and ourselves, it clearly marks us as being in our rightful position as the Chosen People and of our higher quality of humanness, in opposing contrast to the brute mind of the Goyim. Their eyes are open, but they see nothing before them and do not invent (unless perhaps, material things). From this, it is plain that nature herself has destined us to guide and rule the world. WE DEMAND SUBMISSION
 Concealment of guilt, encouragement of wrongdoing between those in the service of the [Global Zio-Satanic] administration – all this kind of evil will disappear after the very first examples of severe punishment. The aura of our power demands suitable, that is, cruel, punishments for the slightest infringement, and we do this to improve the prestige of our supreme power. The sufferer, though his punishment may exceed his offence, will be counted as a soldier falling on the administrative field of battle in the interest of authority, principle and law... [The devotees of this plan consistently mock the concepts of mercy, compassion, and understanding because they are truly the willing servants of a sub-human, dark and demonic force. They are the worshippers of the Lie, the Grand Deception, and are advocates of global totalitarianism, genocide, torture, thievery, and murder. They worship the principles of unlimited power and control through the hoarding of gold, the lying manipulation of information, and the acquisition of unlimited military might. They work in the ways of personal extortion and threats of violence against all who oppose their degenerate, demonic plans. They are the brood of the Fallen Ones, the Biblically described nephalim, the rebellious, arrogant filth rejected by G-d from long ago. They dream of Global Empire, but, in the final moments, shall instead bring upon the Jewish people, whom they always use as their pawns, a very real, and very historical, international Holocaust.] Our government’s ruler will have the APPEARANCE of a father-figure guardian. [Always remember the old Talmudic sorcery, Hollywoodberg motto, “It’s not what is actually real that counts, but only what we conjure to appear to be real that matters. We control the horizontal and the vertical. We are the Satanic Masters of illusion. We Live and you do not.â€] Our own nation and our subjects will see in him: a father caring for their every need, their every act, their every inter-relation as subjects with one another, as well as their relations to the ruler [or the anti-Meshiach]. They will then be so thoroughly filled with the thought that it is impossible for them to dispense with this guardianship and guidance, if they wish to live in peace and quiet, that they will acknowledge the autocracy of our ruler [the anti-Meshiach/anti-Christos] with a devotion bordering on deity worship, especially when they are convinced that those whom we appoint do not put themselves in place of authority, but only blindly execute his dictates. They will rejoice that we have regulated everything in their lives, in much the same way as wise parents who wish to train their children to be duty-bound and submissive. For, in regard to the secrets of our system of government, the peoples of the world are always throughout history only under-age children, just as their governments are likewise. We are obliged, without hesitation, to sacrifice individuals who commit a breach of established order, because the explicit punishment of evil makes a great educational program. When the King of Israel sets the crown offered to him by Europe upon his sacred head he will become patriarch of the world. [that is, unless Vladimir Putin and the Russian Christian Empire, by the power and judgment of G-d Himself, pounds the absolute living fuck out of the Zionist pariah terror state and removes it from the community of nations forever, along with all its various servants and brainless tools.] In order to bring about the destruction of all collective forces except ours, we shall disable the first stage of collectivism – the universities, by re-educating them in a new [conscienceless, nationally treasonous, militaristic] direction. Their officials and professors will be prepared for their business by detailed secret programs of action from which they will not be allowed to diverge, not by one iota. They will be appointed with particular precaution, and will be placed so as to be wholly dependent upon the government. When a large number of persons attempt to deal with issues of administrative regulation, this creates utopian dreamers and bad subjects. You can see this for yourselves from the example of the universal [Greek/Roman classical] education of the Goyim in this direction. We must introduce all those principles into their education which have so brilliantly broken down their harmony. But when we are in power we shall remove every kind of disturbing subject from the course of education [such as the uncensored study of empirical history] and shall turn the youth into obedient children of authority who love the ruler as being the support and hope for peace and quiet. WE SHALL REWRITE HISTORY
 We shall abolish every kind of freedom of instruction. Learners of all ages have the right to assemble together with their parents in the educational establishments, as if it were a club. During these assemblies, and on holidays, teachers will read what will pass as free lectures on social and relationship issues, of the laws of examples, and of the philosophy behind new theories not yet declared to the world. These theories will be raised by us to the stage of a dogma of faith, as in a traditional stage towards our faith. Basically, we know from many centuries of experience that people live, and are guided, by ideas, and that these ideas are absorbed by people only with the aid of education that has equal success for all ages of growth. But, of course, by various methods we shall swallow up and confiscate the last scintilla of independence of thought. We have been directing all thoughts towards subjects and ideas that are useful to us, and have been doing so for a long time. The system of bridling thought is already at work in the so-called system of teaching by object lessons; the purpose of which is to turn the Goyim into unthinking submissive brutes waiting for things to be presented before their eyes in order to form an idea of them... WE SHALL DESTROY THE CLERGY When the time finally comes to destroy the papal court, the finger of an invisible hand will point the nation’s anger toward this court. When, however, the nations come to attack it, we shall come forward in the guise of its defenders as if to save excessive bloodshed. By this diversion we shall penetrate to its very inner sanctum and be sure to never come out again until we have gnawed through the entire strength of this place. Our informers will be selected from all ranks of society: from among the administrative class who spend their time in amusements; editors, printers, and publishers; booksellers, clerks, and salesmen; workmen, coachmen, lackeys, etc. This body, having no rights and not being empowered to take any action on their own account, and consequently a police without any power, will only witness and report. Verification of their reports and arrests will depend upon a responsible group of controllers of police affairs, while the actual act of arrest will be performed by the gendarmerie and the municipal police. Any person not reporting anything seen or heard concerning issues of political importance will also be charged with and made responsible for concealment – if it be proved that he is guilty of this crime. 
 When we need to give more power to our secret police (which are the best form of defense for those in authority) we will arrange for some fake disorders [cf. 9/11 and the Zionist-Neocon attacks on America] to take place. We will then arrange for a group of skilled speakers who will cooperate in pretending to be angry citizens crying out about this. People who are sympathetic to what is being said will then gather around these speakers [See: Jon Gold, Allan Giles (‘Reprecensor’), D. Alexander Floum, Esq. (‘George Washington’), Nicholas Levis, and the rest of the FAKE 9/11 “truther†Zio-intel-group]. This will give us the pretext for demanding that a select group of Goyim police be able to put people’s homes under surveillance. 
 Most conspirators act because they enjoy that type of activity and like to brag about it afterward. So until they do something big we won't do anything to them, except to bring a few things to their attention. If a government frequently discovers that there are conspiracies against them, this gives them a bad image: it makes them look like they know they are weak or, worse yet, that they know they are unjust. As you are aware, we have damaged the image of the Goy kings by making frequent assassination attempts on them [cf. the Jewish assassination attempts (both successful and unsuccessful) on the Czars of Russia and the subsequent retaliatory Czarist pogroms against the seditious Russian Jewish community]. We have done this through our agents, some of whom are people who blindly believe and act on what we tell them; providing that we phrase it in a freedom-seeking political manner. We have forced the rulers to acknowledge their weakness by showing everyone the many secret plots against them. In this way we shall destroy their authority. Although we won’t permit any independent person to meddle in our political affairs, we shall on the other hand encourage every kind of report or petition with proposals for the government to look into all kinds of projects for the improvement of the condition of the people. This will reveal the defects and fantasies of our subjects to us. We shall respond to these proposals by either carrying them out or by providing a wise rebuttal to prove their shortsightedness. 
In order to destroy the prestige of heroism as political crime, we shall put it on trial in the category of thieving, murder, and every other kind of abominable and filthy crime. Public opinion will then confuse political crime with the disgrace attached to those other types of crimes and will then brand it with the same contempt. We have done our best, and I hope we have succeeded in ensuring that the Goyim should not consider that rebellion is a good thing. [That was then. This is now.] It was for this reason that through the Media, in speeches, and indirectly – in cleverly written school-books on history, we have advertised the martyrdom allegedly recommended by rebellion-mongers as a way of securing the common welfare of the public. This advertisement has increased the percentage of freedom seekers and has brought thousands of Goyim into the ranks of our livestock cattle. Economic crises have been produced by us for the Goyim by no other means than the withdrawal of money from circulation. Huge sums of capital have stagnated by withdrawing money from States, which were constantly obliged to apply to those same stagnant capitals toward the payment of loans. These loans burdened the finances of the State with the payment of interest and made them the bonded slaves of this capital. The concentration of money invested in industry in the hands of capitalists, who have taken that money out of the hands of small investors, has drained away all the juices of the peoples and also the States alongside them. You are aware that the Gold Standard has been the ruin of the states which adopted it, because it has not been able to satisfy the demands for money, especially as we have removed gold from circulation as far as possible. GENTILE STATES BANKRUPT TYRANNY OF USURY
 From this calculation it is obvious that, with any form of taxation per head, the State is bailing out the last pennies of the poor taxpayers in order to settle accounts with wealthy foreigners. The State has borrowed money from these foreigners instead of collecting those pennies for its own needs from the taxpayers without the additional interest. So long as loans were internal the Goyim only shuffled their money from the pockets of the poor to those of the rich. But when we changed the system in order to transfer loans into the external sphere, all the wealth of States flowed into our cash-boxes and the Goyim became our subjects. Stagnation of money will not be allowed by us and therefore there will be no State interest-bearing bonds, except a one-percent series. So there will be no payment of interest to leeches [like ourselves] that suck all the strength out of the State. The right to issue interest-bearing bonds will be given exclusively to industrial companies who have no difficulty in paying interest out of their profits. Whereas the State does not make profits on borrowed money like these companies, for the State borrows to spend and not to use in operations. Industrial bonds will also be bought by the government. This will transform those industries into lenders of money at profit. This measure will stop the stagnation of money, parasitic profits and idleness. These things were useful for us when we were among the independent Goyim, but are not desirable under our own rule. It should now be quite obvious that the brainpower of the Goyim is undeveloped, based on the fact that they have been borrowing from us and paying interest without ever thinking that the same amount of money plus the interest must be taken from their own State pockets in order to settle up with us. What could have been simpler than to take the money they wanted from their own people? Our accounts, which we shall present when the time comes, and which are based on the experience gained by centuries of experiments made by us on the Goy States, will be distinguished by clearness and definiteness and will show to everyone at a glance the advantage of our innovations. They will put an end to those abuses to which we owe our mastery over the Goyim, but which cannot be allowed in our kingdom. We shall set up our system of accounting in such a way that neither the ruler nor the most insignificant public servant will be in a position to divert even the smallest sum from its destination without detection, or to direct it in another manner that is contrary to our fixed and definite plan of action [on the other hand, see the treasonous, fake rabbi Dov Zakheim’s unpunished embezzlement of $3.2 trillion dollars of U.S. taxpayer Pentagon cash for the benefit of the Nazi racist state of Israel]. The Goy rulers, whom we once upon a time advised should avoid their ceremonial duties of being a representative at State receptions, observances of etiquette and entertainments, were only smokescreens covering for our rule. The favorite courtiers who replaced the rulers in the sphere of ceremonial affairs were placed there by our agents, and every time gave satisfaction to short-sighted minds by promises that future economics and improvements were foreseen. Economics from what? From new taxes? These are questions that might have been, but were not, asked by those who read our accounts and projects. To what I reported to you at the last meeting, I shall now add a detailed explanation of internal loans. I won’t say any more about foreign loans, because they have fed us with the national moneys of the Goyim. But for our State there will be no foreigners, that is, nothing external. We have taken advantage of the mistakes of administrators and slackness of rulers to get our moneys twice, thrice and more times over; by lending moneys to the Goy governments which were not at all needed by the States. Could anyone get away with making the same type of loans to us? Obviously not! So I shall only deal with the details of internal loans: The process begins by the State announcing that it needs to borrow money from the public. Interest-bearing paper (bills of exchange) will be printed and offered for sale. In order that these are within reach of everyone’s investment capacity, the price of these bills will be kept low, and a discount will be offered for early subscribers. The next day, by artificial means, the price of them goes up; the alleged reason being that everyone is rushing to buy them. In a few days the treasury safes are so-to-speak overflowing and there's more money than they can deal with. The subscription, it is alleged, covers the issue of the loan total many times over. And in this lies the whole stage effect – “Hey look,†they say, “What confidence is being shown in the government’s bills of exchange.†But once the comedy has played out, there emerges the fact that a debit (and an exceedingly burdensome debit) has been created. In order to pay the interest on this debit it becomes necessary to take out new loans, which do not reduce, but only add to the debt owing. And when this credit is exhausted it becomes necessary to introduce new taxes to cover, not the principal of the loan, but only the interest on it. These taxes are a debit created to cover a debit. When we ascend to the throne of the world all these financial and similar types of transfers will be swept away so as not to leave a trace because they are not in accord with our interests. All money markets will also be destroyed, since we shall not allow the prestige of our power to be shaken by fluctuations of prices set upon our values. We shall announce, by law, the price of securities which represents their full worth without any possibility of loweringm or raising it. (Raising gives the pretext for lowering, which indeed was where we made a start in lowering the values of the Goyim.)
 We shall replace the money markets by grandiose government credit institutions, the purpose of which will be to fix the price of industrial values (stock prices) in accordance with government views. These institutions will be in a position to fling upon the market hundreds or millions of industrial bonds in one day, or to buy up the same amount. In this way all industrial undertakings will come to depend on us. You can imagine what immense power we shall secure for ourselves in this way. In everything that I’ve reported to you so far I have endeavored to carefully describe the secret of what is coming: of what happened in the past, of what is going on now, and what will be happening while rushing into the flood of great events coming in the near future. I’ve also described the secret of our relations to the Goyim and of our financial operations. On this subject there still remains a little for me to add. In our hands is the greatest power of our day – gold: in two days we can procure from our storehouses any quantity we may please. Surely there is no need to seek further proof that our rule is predestined by God [the god of gross materialism and deception]. Surely we shall not fail with such wealth to prove that that all the evil which we have had to commit over so many centuries has served at the end of ends, the cause of true well-being – the bringing of everything into order [Novus Ordo Seclorum]. Even though we need to use some violence, we will still establish our rule. We shall ingeniously prove that we are benefactors who have restored the true good and freedom of the person to the torn and mangled earth; and in this way we shall enable it to be enjoyed in peace and quiet, with proper dignity of relations with their government. This is all on the condition, of course, that strict observance be given to the laws established by us... A single authority will be glorious because it will be all-powerful: it will rule and guide, and not muddle along after leaders and orators shrieking themselves hoarse with senseless words which they call great principles and, honestly speaking, they are nothing but unrealistic schemes of idealized perfection. Our authority will be the crowning achievement of order, and included in that is the whole happiness of man. The aura of this authority will inspire a mystical bowing of the knee before it and a respectful fear of all the peoples before it. True force does not negotiate with any right, not even with that of God: none dare come near to it, not even to take so much as an inch of it away. Subjects, I repeat once more, give blind obedience only to authority figures that are strong and absolutely independent of them, because they feel that these figures are a defense against social evils. Why would they want a king [such as Yeshua, the ‘Prince of Peace’] with an angelic spirit? What they need to see in him is the personification of force and power. Then will it be possible for us to say to the peoples of the world: “Give thanks to God and bow on your knee before OUR King [the 666 anti-Christos entity] who bears on his front the seal of the predestination of man. Certain members of the descendants of David will select and prepare the kings and their heirs. They will be selected, not by right of heritage, but by their eminent capabilities. They will be inducted into the most secret mysteries of political methods and schemes of government, although they will not be given specific knowledge of the secrets. The purpose of this mode of action is to demonstrate to everyone that government cannot be entrusted to those who have not been inducted into the secret places of its art. Direct heirs will often be prevented from ascending to the throne if, during their time of training, they exhibit frivolity, softness, or other qualities that are the ruin of authority. Such qualities render them incapable of governing and are dangerous for kingly office. Only those who are unconditionally capable of firm, direct rule will receive the reins of rule from our learned elders, even if they are this way to the point of cruelty [As is repeatedly mentioned throughout this text, Christ-like/Buddha-like qualities, such as truthfulness, mercy, and compassion, are abhorred as despised weaknesses by these 300 elders of the Synagogue of Satan]. In order that the people may know and love their king, it is necessary for him to converse in the market-places with his people. This brings the government and the people together as a combined force – two groups which were previously divided by the terror which was brought by us against the people. It was necessary for us to use this terror to bring the forces of the people and their government under our influence [cf. the ol’ Problem-Reaction-Solution scam]. [Stay awake. Don’t let your guard down and fall back to sleep, and may the G-d of Light protect us all in the upcoming days of chaos, treachery, and darkness.] »
|
PollCan Maduro get a fair trial from Alvin Hellerstein? Of course, Judge Hellerstein is a jurist with integrity. 0% No, Judge Hellerstein works on behalf of the Zionist deep state. 0% Whether he does or not is irrelevant, Maduro is part of the op. 0% He will be bribed into pleading guilty to something minor. 100% Other (specify in comments.) 0% Total votes: 1
Disqus Comments |
uh oh! hang on folks, it's going to be a bumpy ride... :)
Thanks for posting this, Laz, and thanks for your commentary, which was hilarious in parts (move to Prothinktown! hehe)
I couldn't NOT post a comment here though to frame what may well turn into a big debate. Let me just enumerate some thoughts that I have on this mysterious document!
I am not sure that the Protocols are entirely genuine nor am I sure that they are entirely fradulent. Arguments made to the effect that they are plagiarized from Joly's book Dialogues in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesqiueu I find problematic since Joly's book is an enigma unto itself, seemingly discovered after the publication of the Protocols and showing very few signs of itself being a genuine document. I have the book and have read enough of it to conclude that even if the Protocols was copied from it it vastly improved on the original in terms of sheer interest and readability. Every modern reprint of Joly's book is of course sold and prefaced as "the book the Protocols was forged from" which also says a lot I think.
As for how genuine the Protocols themselves are, we shouldstep back and differentiate between the content and the document. The content could well include much truth without being a genuine document. The provenance of the document itself--that it was discovered when a courier of the elders was struck by lightning, is enough to make me have serious doubts about the document. In other words I think it may have been MEANT to be discovered, such that we should not feel like the purported authors goofed or are in any way upset that their master plan was leaked.
What I find more likely is that given the undeniable relevance of much of the content to our world, and the way that the Protocols so accurately convey what is indeed a robust, cynical, and truly Machiavellian view of achieving and wielding power, the Protocols are something akin to the Eric Hufschmidesque pièce de resistance of the turn of the 20th century. To clarify what may seem like an obscure reference to some, let me explain what I mean by that. Eric Hufschmid was one of the first people to come out with good convincing works about 9/11, including a book and a video. Those who proceeded to look at Hufschmid's website discovered a whole lot more than just 9/11. While not all of this other material was wrong or deceitful (though some surely seemed like it could be) that isn't the point. The point is that far from providing the 9/11 truth movement (which did not really exist at the time) with a solid foundation for growth into something with mass appeal--i.e. something effective--it saddled the embryonic movement with a ton of baggage that in many ways hindered its development. Clowns like Penn and Teller could feature Hufschmid on their show, mention in passing that this was a "leading representative" of something called 9/11 revisionism and proceed to portray hima nd his entire body of work as insane. Not only would this discourage people from taking 9/11 revisionism seriously, people who found themselves questioning 9/11 naturally felt that they should distance themselves as much as possible from Hufschmid and all of his ideas, whether related to 9/11 or not. An appropriate analogy would be someone putting a delicious chocolate confection in the refirgerator inside of a stool specimen container so that no one would eat it, or even come close to it.
We need not take the Protocols at face value to find them worth studying. If indeed they are the most vile form of defamation, that is enough reason for the entire world to read them so as to better understand the forms that vile defamation , especially such a successful example as the Protocols, can take. Interestingly, those who most violently oppose the content of the Protocols are the same people who most violently oppose anyone actually reading them. Now I can understand that people wouldn't want them published in comic book form and marketed to young people as fact, like say the fradulent and vile defematory 9/11 Commission Report, but study of the text by open minded critical thinkers should be de rigeur, and not in a setting that tries to impose a dogmatic view of them.
So I encourage everyone to take this opportunity to become familiar with this most controversial of subjects. I hope that it goes without saying that having the text published here does not constitute a blanket endorsement of the document at face value. I also hope that people will respect different views on this question, so long as they are presented responsibly and in a spirit of intellectual detachment, not bombastically or in any manner suited to proselytizing.
Is this something that others would find handy, too?
I don't know what version of Droopy yer runnin' but, there are releases of this for several versions.
Printer, e-mail and PDF versions
Home » Download » Modules
http://drupal.org/project/print
It's not exactly plug and play as it looks to require a bit of tinkering with the CSS to get the prefered output.
There are far too many posts that I would like to archive and some that I would prefer to read while retaining the formatting but, without the other distracting nonsense. Yeah, I can always look at the source and edit to create something more reasonable for archiving but, it is frustrating knowing that modules exist to do some of this automagically..
One drawback of a print version is that they often will lack the comments. You can't have everything. But, there is a workaround for that with copy/paste to a separate companion document. There may even be a way whereby "Annotate" and "Printer Friendly" modules could work together to accomplish this.
--
"But truthfully, I don't really know. We've had trouble getting a handle on Building No. 7."
~~ Dr. Shyam Sunder - Acting Director Building and Fire Research Laboratory (NIST)
> Joly's book is an enigma
> Joly's book is an enigma unto itself, seemingly discovered after the publication of the Protocols
Before there was Maurice Joly, there was Eugene Sue. Sue is the one whom Joly cribbed from, as parts of the Protocols were later cribbed from Joly. THE MYSTERIES OF THE PEOPLE or THE HISTORY OF A PROLETARIAN FAMILY DOWN THROUGH THE AGES was Sue's final giant 3-volume work which starts from ancient Roman times and leads up to the 1830s in the land of Gaul (aka France). The segments of DIALOGUES come from the 3rd volume, set against the background of the French revolution. Sue wrote quite a number of Jesuit conspiracy novels. THE WANDERING JEW is another of his novels which features the Jesuits as the hidden controllers. The formation of the Jesuits is placed in the story as part of volume 3 in MYSTERIES OF A PEOPLE.
In any event, the hypothetical program described in the PROTOCOLS carries no resemblance to our modern world. The PROTOCOLS were written in a time when socialism was gaining popularity and they attempt to cast a negative light upon it by insinuating that socialism is the conspiracy of the Elders. In our day, privatization and economic deregulation is the way of the future as long as capitalism persists.
no resemblance to our modern world?
To begin with, it would be remarkable if it did bear overt resemblance to our modern world, since they were written 100 years ago at least. They bore more resemblance to what was happeniing at the time they were published. That said, there are parts in which you might think they were written yesterday, in particular with regard to its critique of the unthinking masses and the charades which they are led to believe are reality.
People like Henry Ford can be forgiven, in other words, for taking this document seriously. It is clearly written by someone with a fairly sophisticated understanding of the world. My best guess is that their purpose was indeed to be "prescient" enough to gain adherents and promoters. At the same time they were written in a manner designed to incite suspicion and hatred against Jews. I presume that no one would argue with those facts. What follows is the possibility of (at least) the following three interpretations:
1) the Protocols are a genuine document revealing a plot by Jewish elders to rule the world.
2) the Protocols are a fraud written by Jew haters to turn the world against Jews and facilitate their persecution.
that of course is the standard dichotomy... I propose a third interpretation:
3) the Protocols are a fabrication in the strict sense that they are not actually a write-up from a "grand meeting" of Jewish elders but instead a largely fictionalized account that nonetheless incorporates some real-world truth in order to provoke a backlash that would serve a certain purpose, namely to galvanize world Jewry around the Zionist project.
What I am proposing is that in the grand tradition of Problem-->Reaction-->Solution the document was forged by Zionists who realized that world Jewry was not at all as enamoured of their program as they themselves were. By creating a forgery at once transparent enough to make easily "debunkable" yet convincing enough to snare not only the masses but men like Henry Ford in its trap they were able to cast themselves as righteous victims (remember that the first world Zionist congress predated the "discovery" of the Protocols by a short few years...) Why else would they have been titled the Protocols of the Elders of ZION if not to link them to the nascent Zionist movement?
This of course raises the fascinating question of the rise of Hitler and the role that the Protocols played in inciting the virulent anti-semitism that he both fed and fed off of. Given that the Zionist project is unlikely to have been successful in creating Israel as we know it today were it not for the (much exaggerated) holocaust story, one begins to see just how crucial the Protocols themselves were to the success of Zionism.
Ironic, idn't it!
> critique of the unthinking
> critique of the unthinking masses and the charades which they are led to believe are reality
That unfortunately has been the case for thousands of years. Nothing new there.
> People like Henry Ford can be forgiven, in other words, for taking this document seriously
Ford was not a neutral analyst examining a document and believing it was authentic. Ford was an anti-union business man who was drawn to the Protocols as a way of charging unionism and related social movements as part of an evil conspiracy. The Protocols carry several predictions of historical events in their day, all of which were easily predictable by any well-read person. The Protocols predict:
a) The rise of the United States and Japan to world power status, and the decline of Europe.
b) A war between Russia and Japan.
c) A general European war among all the major powers.
d) A revolution in Russia which would overthrow the Czar.
More generally, the Protocols make multiple references to the various socialist movements of that time which were growing rapidly then.
All of these concrete events were eminently predictable in the 1890s, and often had been predicted by others who had nothing to do with the Protocols. Ford was following a pattern of treating these predictions with an exaggerated incredulity so as to rationalize the view which treated labor unionism as a shocking development. Social welfare legislation backed up by money raised from taxes on the rich was another thing which Ford had an interest in opposing, and so jumped on the Protocols as evidence that such taxation and social spending was of Satanic intent. Of course Reagan and his successors have repealed most of the taxation that Ford opposed. But even when such taxation on the rich was more in force than it is today, it was a very self-interested belief which Ford attached himself to that involved more than just an honest mistake.
This was exactly the pattern which the exiled White officers used when invoking the Protocols in the years after their defeat. Although every serious analysis of Russia in the late 19th and early 20th centuries clearly showed that a revolution was in the making, the White exiles felt a need to justify the degree to which they had gotten out of touch with things in their own backyard and so began invoking the Protocols as a way of indicating that only some hidden hand could have predicted a revolution in Russia. They simply did not wish to acknowledge in their own minds that not only was some type of revolution in Russia, but that it would ultimately have to be led by one or more of the traditional parties of the Left which they hated.
That's not to say that it had to be led by the Bolsheviks. Under different historical circumstances it might have been led by the Mensheviks, or one of either the Left or Right branches of the Social Revolutionaries, or some combination of these parties. But for the latter groups to gain power they would have needed the cooperation of the army, just as Salvador Allende depended on General Pinochet's cooperation. These parties were not organizationally prepared to take power against the opposition of the army. Only the Bolsheviks were. The Whites guaranteed the triumph of the latter by adamantly rejecting all other leadership from the traditional Left in Russia.
a lot of nothing with regard to my actual point!
Also I think you grossly oversimplify Ford's position. Something that Ford said that made a lot of sense is that the "anti-capitalists" overemphasized the power of people like Ford while ignoring the role that bankers played. Ford argued that it was the bankers who controlled access to capital and its value and therefore were the true enemies of the working class. He depended on access to this capital to fund his enterprise, and so was not the all-powerful master/exploiter of laborers that the left made him out to be. This pattern continues to this day with the left totally ignoring the role of international finance and fixating on the divisive issue of the relation between those who depend on the financiers and those who depend on those who depend on the financiers. In any case, taxation by a government of its people in order to pay off debts that it nedd never have incurred *is* a ridiculous system and Ford was quite right to oppose it. I'm curious, Patrick, do you also deny that the great depression was engineered by bankers?
> Something that Ford said
> Something that Ford said that made a lot of sense is that the "anti-capitalists" overemphasized the power of people like Ford while ignoring the role that bankers played.
More accurate is that Ford drew a caricature of bankers as something independent of the capitalist system as a whole. Bankers have never been "deemphasized" by whatever "anti-capitalists" is supposed to mean here (Marxist or otherwise). Banks are analyzed as one type institution within the capitalist system.
> the great depression was engineered by bankers?
More accurate is that people of that time were still overly attached to the gold standard, and this aggravated what was a natural recession. The speculative market had been raging for several years and was bound to crash. The crash could have been softened (though not avoided) by loosening the credit lines. To be able to do such would have required dumping any pretense of the gold standard, which was clearly out of date. At that time the gold standard was considered sacrosanct and so it was felt necessary to tighten credit in upholding the gold standard. This aggravated what was an unavoidable depression and made it worse than it had to be.
This is a classic case example of how Right-wingers ignorant of economics assign a mystical power to bankers. What makes it funny is that many of the most vocal Right-wingers who spout this rubbish frequently call for a restoration of the gold standard. In other words, they repeat exactly the same error which the managers of the Federal Reserve made at the time of the Crash of 1929. Yet they phrase it as if the Federal Reserve is supposed to be able to cancel the depression by magic while pursuing the same mistaken policy of adhering to the gold standard.
the gold standard, the protocols, and the great depression
From wikipedia:
From Protocol 20:
So, if only people had taken the Protocols seriously, people would have realized what a bad idea the gold standard was, eh Patrick? And I agree that the Ron Paulistas are stupid to be buying back into the gold arguments. We at WTCD are big fans of a little movie called Money As Debt, which makes it clear that we don't need money to be based on metal OR debt.
Anyway what wikipedia doesn't really go into is the actions of individual bankers that contributed to the money contraction. You erroneously accuse people of attributing magical powers to bankers--none of this seems remotely magical to those of us who, unlike most people including politicians, actually understand the way money works. Instead, you act like the Federal Reserve really is this wonderful money-managing regulatory body and that recessions "just happen" and that sometimes--oops!--they become great big depressions because, well, stuff happens, and nobody's perfect, yata yata. Anyone can see that speculative bubbles are allowed to form (tech stocks, real estate, etc. and that's just in the last 10 years) and that they inevitably pop and that in the process those who knew when to get in and when to get out end up making out like the bandits they are. Anyone who watches Money As Debt, moreover, can see just what a scam is involved in the current privatized mo,ney system and why coincidentally enough the income tax and the federal reserve, neither of which were apparently necessary before, came into existence at around the same time.
> recessions "just
> recessions "just happen"
On a capitalist market, yes, recessions and speculative finacial bubbles have been around for centuries. In the 19th century during the Free Banking Era it used to be a normal thing for banks to go bust every 5 years. Here they give a summary of the tulip speculation bubble from the 17th century:
http://www.jwafinancialgroup.com/articles/the_tulip_bubble.html
Galbraith discusses more of this in A SHORT HISTORY OF FINANCIAL EUPHORIA.
> those who knew when to get in and when to get out end up making out like the bandits they are
The Rothcshild family very definitively lost from the Great Depression. You can find many of the details starting from page 464 onwards in Niall Ferguson, THE HOUSE OF ROTHSCHILD, THE WORLD'S BANKER, 1849-1999. In general, long-established interests do not benefit very well from major crashes. Sometimes a well-informed speculator may be able to enrich themselves, but the myth that long-running banking interests made money from the Depression is just that.
Niall Ferguson? You're citing HIM as an authority?
The man lies through his teeth about 9/11, OR is stupid enough to be fooled by the cover-up. Either way, I think your citing him as an authority on the Rothschilds is hilarious--you who claim to be a truther! I feel like saying something rude but I don't want to offend you--I'm learning far too much from your denials to want you to stop posting!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2007/03/18/do...
Oh yes, Ferguson's work on the Rothschilds is BRILLIANT!
Henry Kissinger also chose him to write his bio--looks like old boy Niall has a specialty of sorts!
From the Amazon review of NF's Rothschilds book:
Ferguson's sprawling history covers much ground and involves a cast of hundreds of players. At the outset he notes that his book was commissioned by the modern descendants of the House of Rothschild; even so, he approaches his task with careful balance and a critical eye, pointing out the Rothschilds' failings as well as successes. The result is a fine, solid contribution to economic history, one that, unlike so many books in the field, is eminently readable. --Gregory McNamee
> he approaches his task
> he approaches his task with careful balance and a critical eye, pointing out the Rothschilds' failings as well as successes
A fair summary. As already noted, any distortions in Ferguson's text will more likely pertain to special issues like the Cambridge spies question. But every serious account makes it clear that the Depression was a loss, not a gain, for Wall Street:
"The aftermath of the stock market crash had been an increase in bank failures. From 498 in 1928 the number had risen to 659 in 1929 and to 1,380 in 1930. The larger, more conservative institutions were now being dragged down by the defaults of customers and correspondent banks. In 1931, 2,293 banks suspended."
-- Elgin Groseclose, AMERICA'S MONEY MACHINE: THE STORY OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE, p. 179.
New York banks were forced to close by March 1933, and that triggered closures all across the country. It was only the Second World War which made possible a reconstruction of capitalism which restored profitability. But certainly not many people can be said to have profited from the Depression itself. Perhaps Henry Ford did, since his status as an auto-manufacturer blossomed quite well in the 1930s. But mainly the Depression was a drag-down on banks that was protracted by adherence to the gold standard and only resolved when war had created a new world economy.
what a bank closing means...
...is that all that money that the average joe entrusted them with vanished. well, all but the reserve requirement--the rest they lent out several times over and collected interest on.
bank customer: hi i'd like my money please.
banker: sorry we don't have it anymore, we lent it out.
bank customer: well, can I have it when you get it back?
banker: oh we're not going to get it back, the person we lent it to said they don't have it either.
bank customer: so you've just robbed me?
banker: well, no, we were just giving you a very bad return on your investment. then we were both robbed by the defaulting borrower.
bank customer: I see. Well, you seem to dress very nicely and drive a very nice car--how do you manage what with your bank failing?
banker: well, I don't keep my money in this bank--it's actually somewhere safe.
bank customer: earning interest?
banker: doesn't have to--I earn interest on YOUR money.
bank customer: I see. Well, I guess there's not much to be done. Thanks, in any case, for doing such a great job of regulating trade!
banker: you bet!
> citing him as an authority
> citing him as an authority on the Rothschilds is hilarious
Not anywhere near as hilarious as THE MONEY MASTERS recommending a hoaxer like G. Edward Griffin, CREATURE FROM JEKYLL ISLAND, as a reference source. Yes, Ferguson is an establishment, plain and simple. The fact remains that he is much more dependable for basic facts than a con-man like Griffin.
I'm forced to wonder if people who make statements like "the most effective propaganda is 99% accurate" really comprehend what they're saying. Unlike a natural-born liar who spews out hoaxes on every other page the way Griffin does, Ferguson does maintain at least 99% accuracy. It's possible that at some point a careful scrutiny of Ferguson's tome by informed researchers (which pretty much excludes anyone who depends on Griffin for anything) may eventually bring to light some specific points where Ferguson has bent the truth. I can't say, but won't rule it out.
But the general picture which Ferguson details, using mostly publicly available sources as references (hint: check the bibliography and footnotes, Ferguson's book does not primarily depend upon secret memos as reference sources), will not likely be changed in the broad picture. The Rothschilds did lose in the Great Depression. They were forced to write off the Austrian Creditanstalt and accept other losses such as the failed dealings with Ivan Kreuger in Sweden.
If Ferguson can eventually be found to have doctored the facts on anything it more likely pertain to very specific issues, such as the dispute over whether or not Victor Rothschild in the 1930s knowingly aided Kim Philby and other Cambridge spies. Ferguson brushes it off as a false allegation, and the arguments given by Ron Perry are all circumstantial. But there may be more to it than Ferguson admits. This is the type of issue where an official biographer has the job of cleaning up the details to look pretty. But on the history of basic finances in the Rothschild house, Ferguson is a million times more reliable than a fraudster like Griffin or any DVDs made with Griffin as their source.
money masters section on the Rothschilds
I've been wanting to
I've been wanting to recommend an excellent book on the income tax, which is a misunderstood excise tax, called "Cracking the Code". Here's the website: www.losthorizons.com . The author has scanned copies of IRS refunds to people who have filed for them because 90% of people are not required to pay them.
The IRS code is literally like programming code. What common folk use as lay terms have custom definitions which are no where near the terms used in the code. For instance, the word employee is defined in a separate section of code which would be almost impossible to find except for the fact that the IRS made the mistake of digitizing the code such that it can be instantly, electronically searched. Most people would use the term employee to mean one who performs work for another. The code defines 'employee' as one who performs work in a federal office or capacity. The swine have created custom definitions for entire phrases such as "trade or business" which also relate to performing functions of office in a federal capacity.
I HIGHLY urge people to at a minimum check out the website and see the scanned refunds and correspondences with the IRS . I hope I haven't already posted about this here and apologize if I did. The code is literally like programming code and words are mixed with "terms"(word variables. another example: the term 'fruit' could be defined as 'apples, oranges' only which would fool the lay person who uses the common word 'fruit' to describe 'apples, oranges, pears, and all other fruits').
Don't take my word for it ;). Go look at it yourself and learn what you are liable for under this statist system.
Hey whitey - Re: losthorizons.com
Caveat emptor!
Hendrickson's technique sounds appetizing... at first.
I suggest that you listen to the parts of some of the radio shows that Dave Champion has done where he discusses the problems with Hendrickson's technique. Search each year of the archives to find the particular shows using the search term "hendrickson". The 16kb mp3s are small and of good quality. And, since the summary for each show archived is is in order of the material discussed, you can easily skip to the portion of a show that is of interest. Each 2-hour show is broken down into 2 1-hour mp3 segments.
http://americanradioshow.us/archive.html
FYI:
Dave Champion has a compelling argument for the legal distinction between taxpayers and non-taxpayers. Non-taxpayers don't file returns. Therefore, they don't have need to file amended returns or returns requesting refunds. Which means, of course, that they no use for Hendrickson's dangerous technique. :-)
Check out his site http://www.originalintent.org and click on the "Education" link. There are a number of short treatises that Dave has written to help bring people up to speed regarding the true applicability of the federal income tax. I suggest reading them in the order presented. I've been following Dave Champion for quite a few years. I separated his wheat from the chaff of the many untaxing gurus, ala Hendrickson, long ago. He is working on a book due out in the next 4-5 months that, I'm sure, will be quite compelling.
If you've not heard of Larken Rose, I recommend checking out his work simply for the sake of learning a bit about how the statutes and code are supposed to work. You can check out his research here:
Larken's video, Theft by Deception, is based upon his research summarized in his report "Taxable Income - The Evolution of the U.S. Income Tax Deception"
Theft By Deception - Deciphering The Federal Income Tax
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7521758492370018023
Taxable Income - The Evolution of the U.S. Income Tax Deception
http://www.theft-by-deception.com/Taxable%20Income.pdf
Larken's new book is about his personal experience with the government prosecuting him as a part of their defending their fraudulent misapplication of the federal income tax:
Kicking the Dragon (Confessions of a Tax Heretic)
http://www.kickingthedragon.com/
"The book which chronicles the eight year saga of this
“tax heretic†lays out in detail the sometimes amusing, sometimes infuriating tale of a modern-day witch-hunt,
a corrupt and dishonest government bent on harassing, demonizing, persecuting, silencing and imprisoning those
who publicly question the gospel according to the powers
that be. The disturbing facts of the case pull back the
facade of “due process†and the “rule of law†to reveal
the United States government for what it has devolved
into: a gang of lawless criminals interested only in
preserving their own power by any means necessary."
I agree with the notion of
I agree with the notion of making oneself familiar with "reviled" texts. One must first overcome the conditioning which evokes anxiety when contemplating certain issues or reading certain texts. As a peace loving anarchist it took some serious will power to even speak the word "jew" within the context of intrigue. This is no doubt due to hearing others mock and call those who use the word in that context, anti-semetic. It felt wierd downloading and reading Mein Kampf; however, once I got started (never finished) I was able to learn about Hitler's own approach to deceiving the German masses and ruling over them. The Protocols, whether real or fake, give the same kind of emotional response initially. But when you get into it a ways you realize that certain attitudes and techniques are being implemented regardless of the document's authenticity.
The whole notion of a choclate covered in turd is an example of what would be called an 'innoculation' in psychology. If one 'primes' the attitude of another by presenting certain information, the individual will become innoculated against later information which is contrary to the priming info. This works well on a large percentage of the population but some people are pretty much immune to it because they are detail fiends and are not easily swayed by 'innoculation' and 'priming'.
As I was telling my girlfriend the other night, humans have not evolved much, if at all, in the past hundreds of years. The Earth was recently considered flat by a large percentage of the population. It took the efforts of those who are detail oriented and HONEST to change this general attitude. Honest, detail oriented people must not be discouraged in their efforts by slander or by being called nuts or by feeling isolated. We must carry a certain burden all of our lives because of our gifts of curiousity, honesty, integrity, and courage. The payoff is well worth the burden. So keep digging ya'll!
> Bolsheviks had overthrown
> Bolsheviks had overthrown the Russian monarchy with financial support from the House of Rothschild
Old rubbish repeats itself endlessly.
First of all, the statement is obviously techniocally incorrect since the Czarist government was overthrown in March 1917 by mass-rallies in the streets. The Bolsheviks overthrew the Provisional Government in November 1917. If the Provisional Government hadn't chosen to continue the war against Germany then they plausibly might have been able to stabilize the situation. Their decision to carry on with a war that all of Russia was demanding stop was what doomed them.
The Russian Civil War began in the spring of 1918 with an uprising by conservative military officers who were given the name of "Whites" (as opposed to "Reds"). Britain, France, and to a lesser degree the United States did make an effort to support the Whites in the civil war. There was never any Rothschild plan to install the Bolsheviks. That's a legend. The Whites lost because they alienated the majority of Russians much faster than their opponents did. Military aid which England sent to the Whites was rerouted into black markets by the White officers themselves, who were extremely corrupt and had no comprehension that the Red Army would do more than simply fall over at the first push.
People who push this Rothschild-installs-Bolsheviks meme have generally proven to be rather ignorant of the specifics of the Russian civil war. It originated from efforts by exiled White officers to explain their defeat in a way which would cover over their own gross neglect of real issues while the war was in process. It caught on because the Old Right was eager to propagate conspiratorial explanation for revolutions without giving much attention to the real social facts.
according to Douglas Reed
in his 1956 book Controversy of Zion, the Balfour declaration was addressed to "Lord Rothschild" as a means of giving Zionism a "western flavor", but the Rothschild family like all Jews were sharply divided on the issue of Zionism.
According to Reed, Zionism and Communism (Bolshevism) were two heads of the same global conspiracy outlined in the Protocols but neither a conspiracy of all Jews nor an all Jewish conspiracy, though it does indeed control the major media. In most respects Reed's views are those of anti-NWO types like Alex Jones, though Reed did not shy away from placing Zionism squarely in the center of the NWO conspiracy.
All very tangled up, imo. Whatever happened to "follow the money?"
> According to Reed, Zionism
> According to Reed, Zionism and Communism (Bolshevism) were two heads of the same global conspiracy outlined in the Protocols
Reed recycles a lot of legends, but shows no real knowledge of the Russian civil war. If one wants to follow the money, then the logical conclusion is that the money trail given by Britain, France and all other Allies went to the Whites. The Whites wasted it because they completely failed to comprehend the fact that Russia was going through a full-blown revolution. They would take uniforms sent to them by Britain and trade them on the black market while the soldiers in the White armies were forced to fight in rags. That's just one of many case examples about how the Whites wasted away the aid given to them. Such carelessness and corruption by the Whites can not be accounted for by any "Elders of Zion" conspiracy.
A Note on the Snake Symbolism in the Protocols
Professor Sergius Nilus’ 1905 Epilogue Note on “The Symbolic Snake of Judaismâ€
“I have some good news. We’re only a few steps away from our goal. There’s a small way to go, but when we get there, we’ll have achieved the closing of our Symbolic Snake. This Snake represents the spreading of our people across Europe. When the Snake closes into a loop, the whole of Europe will be locked in its constricting coils.†(Protocol III)
(Translation from the Russian by Victor E. Marsden):
Protocol III opens with a reference to the Symbolic Snake of Judaism. In his Epilogue to the 1905 Edition of the Protocols, Nilus gives the following interesting account of this symbol:
“According to the records of secret Jewish Zionism, Solomon and other Jewish learned men already, in 929 B.C., thought out a scheme in theory for a peaceful conquest of the whole universe by Zion. As history developed, this scheme was worked out in detail and completed by men who were subsequently initiated in this question. These learned men decided by peaceful means to conquer the world for Zion with the slyness of the Symbolic Snake, whose head was to represent those who have been initiated into the plans of the Jewish administration, and the body of the Snake to represent the Jewish people – the administration was always kept secret, EVEN FROM THE JEWISH NATION ITSELF. As this Snake penetrated into the hearts of the nations which it encountered, it undermined and devoured all the non-Jewish power of these States. It is foretold that the Snake has still to finish its work, strictly adhering to the designed plan, until the course which it has to run is closed by the return of its head to Zion and until, by this means, the Snake has completed its round of Europe and has encircled it – and until, by dint of enchaining Europe, it has encompassed the whole world. This it is to accomplish by using every endeavor to subdue the other countries by an ECONOMICAL CONQUEST. The return of the head of the Snake to Zion can only be accomplished after the power of all the Sovereign of Europe has been laid low, that is to say, when by means of economic crises and wholesale destruction effected everywhere, there shall have been brought about a spiritual demoralization and a moral corruption, chiefly with the assistance of Jewish women masquerading as French, Italians, etc. These are the surest spreaders of licentiousness into the lives of the leading men at the heads of nations. A map of the course of the Symbolic Snake is shown as follows: Its first stage in Europe was in 429 B.C. in Greece, where, about the time of Pericles, the Snake first started eating into the power of that country. The second stage was in Rome in the time of Augustus, about 69 B.C. The third in Madrid in the time of Charles V, in A.D. 1552. The fourth in Paris about 1790, in the time of Louis XVI. The fifth in London from 1814 onwards (after the downfall of Napoleon). The sixth in Berlin in 1871 after the Franco-Prussian war. The seventh in St. Petersburg, over which is drawn the head of the Snake under the date of 1881. [This "Snake" is now being drawn through the Americas and in the United States of America, it has been partially identified as the “Council on Foreign Relations†(C.F.R.) and the “Trilateral Commissionâ€]. All these States which the Snake traversed have had the foundations of their constitutions shaken, Germany, with its apparent power, forming no exception to the rule. In economic conditions, England and Germany are spared, but only till the conquest of Russia is accomplished by the Snake, on which at present [i.e., 1905] all its efforts are concentrated. The further course of the Snake is not shown on this map, but arrows indicate its next movement towards Moscow, Kiev and Odessa. It is now well known to us to what extent the latter cities form the centres of the militant Jewish race. Constantinople is shown as the last stage of the Snake’s course before it reaches Jerusalem. (This map was drawn years before the occurrence of the “Young Turk†- i.e., Jewish Revolution in Turkey).
Solzhenitsyn breaks last taboo of the revolution
Solzhenitsyn breaks last taboo of the revolution
Nick Patton Walsh – The Guardian January 25, 2003
Alexander Solzhenitsyn, who first exposed the horrors of the Stalinist gulag, is now attempting to tackle one of the most sensitive topics of his writing career - the role of the Jews in the Bolshevik revolution and Soviet purges.
In his latest book Solzhenitsyn, 84, deals with one of the last taboos of the communist revolution: that Jews were as much perpetrators of the repression as its victims. Two Hundred Years Together - a reference to the 1772 partial annexation of Poland and Russia which greatly increased the Russian Jewish population - contains three chapters discussing the Jewish role in the revolutionary genocide and secret police purges of Soviet Russia.
But Jewish leaders and some historians have reacted furiously to the book, and questioned Solzhenitsyn's motives in writing it, accusing him of factual inaccuracies and of fanning the flames of anti-semitism in Russia.
Solzhenitsyn argues that some Jewish satire of the revolutionary period "consciously or unconsciously descends on the Russians" as being behind the genocide. But he states that all the nation's ethnic groups must share the blame, and that people shy away from speaking the truth about the Jewish experience.
In one remark which infuriated Russian Jews, he wrote: "If I would care to generalise, and to say that the life of the Jews in the camps was especially hard, I could, and would not face reproach for an unjust national generalisation. But in the camps where I was kept, it was different. The Jews whose experience I saw - their life was softer than that of others."
Yet he added: "But it is impossible to find the answer to the eternal question: who is to be blamed, who led us to our death? To explain the actions of the Kiev cheka [secret police] only by the fact that two thirds were Jews, is certainly incorrect."
Solzhenitsyn, awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1970, spent much of his life in Soviet prison camps, enduring persecution when he wrote about his experiences. He is currently in frail health, but in an interview given last month he said that Russia must come to terms with the Stalinist and revolutionary genocides - and that its Jewish population should be as offended at their own role in the purges as they are at the Soviet power that also persecuted them.
"My book was directed to empathise with the thoughts, feelings and the psychology of the Jews - their spiritual component," he said. "I have never made general conclusions about a people. I will always differentiate between layers of Jews. One layer rushed headfirst to the revolution. Another, to the contrary, was trying to stand back. The Jewish subject for a long time was considered prohibited. Zhabotinsky [a Jewish writer] once said that the best service our Russian friends give to us is never to speak aloud about us."
But Solzhenitsyn's book has caused controversy in Russia, where one Jewish leader said it was "not of any merit".
"This is a mistake, but even geniuses make mistakes," said Yevgeny Satanovsky, president of the Russian Jewish Congress. "Richard Wagner did not like the Jews, but was a great composer. Dostoyevsky was a great Russian writer, but had a very sceptical attitude towards the Jews.
"This is not a book about how the Jews and Russians lived together for 200 years, but one about how they lived apart after finding themselves on the same territory. This book is a weak one professionally. Factually, it is so bad as to be beyond criticism. As literature, it is not of any merit."
But DM Thomas, one of Solzhenitsyn's biographers, said that he did not think the book was fuelled by anti-semitism. "I would not doubt his sincerity. He says that he firmly supports the state of Israel. In his fiction and factual writing there are Jewish characters that he writes about who are bright, decent, anti-Stalinist people."
Professor Robert Service of Oxford University, an expert on 20th century Russian history, said that from what he had read about the book, Solzhenitsyn was "absolutely right".
Researching a book on Lenin, Prof Service came across details of how Trotsky, who was of Jewish origin, asked the politburo in 1919 to ensure that Jews were enrolled in the Red army. Trotsky said that Jews were disproportionately represented in the Soviet civil bureaucracy, including the cheka.
"Trotsky's idea was that the spread of anti-semitism was [partly down to] objections about their entrance into the civil service. There is something in this; that they were not just passive spectators of the revolution. They were part-victims and part-perpetrators.
"It is not a question that anyone can write about without a huge amount of bravery, and [it] needs doing in Russia because the Jews are quite often written about by fanatics. Mr Solzhenitsyn's book seems much more measured than that."
Yet others failed to see the need for Solzhenitsyn's pursuit of this particular subject at present. Vassili Berezhkov, a retired KGB colonel and historian of the secret services and the NKVD (the precursor of the KGB), said: "The question of ethnicity did not have any importance either in the revolution or the story of the NKVD. This was a social revolution and those who served in the NKVD and cheka were serving ideas of social change.
"If Solzhenitsyn writes that there were many Jews in the NKVD, it will increase the passions of anti-semitism, which has deep roots in Russian history. I think it is better not to discuss such a question now.â€
www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/jan/25/russia.books
> Researching a book on
> Researching a book on Lenin, Prof Service came across details of how Trotsky, who was of Jewish origin, asked the politburo in 1919 to ensure that Jews were enrolled in the Red army. Trotsky said that Jews were disproportionately represented in the Soviet civil bureaucracy, including the cheka.
Yes, exactly, this highlights precisely what is offbase about much innuendo which people spread.
It is a well-documented fact that, among those intellectuals, people of educated background, who took an interest in the signs of a growing revolution, Jews tended to be the most prominent. Educated Russian Gentiles were able to fit too easily into the high society of Czarist Russia and so became increasingly out of touch with what was going on among the people. When the new revolutionary government was forced to look for educated people who were less likely to work for the Whites, Jews were predominant among the choices. As Service's comment makes clear, this was in no way motivated by a "Learned Elders" plot to install Jews per se in power. Revolutionary leaders such as Trotsky, whom Service cites, as well as Lenin and others always viewed this predominance of Jews in the civil bureaucracy as problematic, an issue which had to be slowly addressed somehow.
What is silly is when Right-wingers attempt to use such points to imply that the majority of uneducated Russians really supported the old social order and that the revolution was somehow secretly pulled off behind their backs. The march on the Winter Palace in January 1905 is emblematic of how things began:
-----
January 22, 1905, came to be known in Russian history as "Bloody Sunday." On that day the police of the capital fired at a huge demonstration of workers led by an adventurer and priest named George Gapon, killing, according to the official estimate, one hundred and thirty persons and wounding several hundred. Ironically, Gapon's union had been essentially a "police union," part of policeman Serge Zubatov's plan to infiltrate the labor movement and direct it into officially desirable channels. Ironically too, the workers were converging on the Winter Palace -- ignorant of the fact that Nicholas II was not there -- with icons and the tsar's portraits, as faithful subjects, nay, children, of their sovereign, begging him for redress and help.
-----
-- Nicholas Riasonovsky, A HISTORY OF RUSSIA, p. 407.
This was clearly not in any way arranged by the "Learned Elders" or any other outsider. It was part of a social explosion which had been building all across Russia. The party of Constitutional Democrats was formed in response to this, but they never did much and it was always obvious that they functioned as what we would today call "fake opposition." If the Constitutional Democrats had been formed 4 decades earlier and had set out to lead a revolution in Russia similar to the English or French revolutions, then by 1905 the dust would have settled and Russia would have been developing as a republic. But the CD party was only formed in response to workers uprisings and mass-strikes which spread across the whole country.
The Constitutional Democrats played an important role in bringing about the Bolshevik revolution, because they were prominent in insisting that Kerensky's government should remain in WWI. The CDs lacked all sense of independent confidence that they could lead a revolution of their own in their own country, the way that Jefferson and Washington did. Instead, the CDs believed that they had to sustain an alliance with the established constitutional democracies, England, France and the United States, in order to have support from these nations when developing a new government in Russia. For that reason, the CDs insisted on remaining in WWI and this created a new social explosion by Russians sick of the war.
The July uprising showed very clearly what was in the making. Workers and soldiers launched an uprising where they demanded that the Bolsheviks should take power. Lenin was not at all prepared for this and was forced to go into hiding very suddenly because this was not an uprising which he had in any way planned.
Now if someone seeks to imply that all such uprisings across Russia which occurred from January 1905 to July 1917 were somehow orchestrated by a "Learned Elders" conspiracy, then they're full of it. If one only wishes to make the point that Russia would have been better off if a higher proportion of educated Gentiles had realized which way the wind was blowing and had joined the efforts to build the various would-be revolutionary parties, then, yes, of course that's true. The more wider a variety of intellectuals committed to preparing for the unavoidable revolution, the better off Russia would have been. But, again, this is quite different from is often implied. Solzhenitsyn as an ideologue devoted a lot of time to falsely idealizing the old Czarist social order. One should be wary of getting sucked into such myths.
Winner of the 2008 WTCD Obfuscation Award
Winner of the 2008 WTCD Obfuscation Award – Patrick S. McNallystein
“In any event, the hypothetical program described in the PROTOCOLS carries no resemblance to our modern world.â€
— Patrick S. McNallystein
Patrick, or Josh, or Chaim, or whatever your real name might be, what “modern world†do you exactly happen to be living in? Why is it that you refuse to discuss any of the actual CONTENT found in the Protocols, but instead prefer to drone on and on and on about an historical event that no longer has any relevance to present conditions? In light of the current global crisis, who gives a rat’s fucking ass about the Bolsheviks, the Mensheviks, or all the rest. The Bolsheviks are no longer in power. The communists are no longer in power. Russia is once again a Christian state under Putin, and he has at present removed all Jews from their former positions of media and financial control over Russia. That is why Pravda is so much more truthful these days than say, the Jewish-controlled New York Times. That is why he has waged war against the Jewish oligarch crime syndicate who ruined Russia (with the support of Clinton) after the fall of communism in the 1990s. This is why Putin has recently stated his firm opposition to a uni-polar world. Because of this, Putin and Russia, including the Russian Orthodox Church, are now targeted for destruction through a global military conflict by the “super power†pawns (the U.S. and the U.K.) of the Rothschild banking system. Russia is now the biggest obstacle to the above described, ‘Committee of 300’ game plan.
I don’t care if fucking Mahatma Gumbhi wrote the Protocols. Who wrote them, or how they surfaced, is completely irrelevant to the plan they illustrate and what is now happening in the “modern world.†What is highly relevant is that the “hidden hand†of the real powers that seek to install a one-world government with a one-world religion (as the reactionary solution to all the problems that these “people†artificially create) are indeed using these Protocols as a game plan or blueprint for bringing this all about, and the bringing forth of a Zionist nuclear armed State in the middle of the world’s biggest energy region was part of the plan all along. As I mentioned before in another comment located somewhere on this blog, it is as if someone with a lot of wealth and power read the Protocols, Orwell’s 1984 and Huxley’s Brave New World, and decided that these combined books contain some very ingenious plans and very diabolical ideas for bringing about such a New World Order, and therefore these “people,†such as Kissinger or Rockefeller, decided to adopt the ideas and plans found in these so-called “forged,†or “fictional†works of “literature.†Just as one needs to remove the stability and strength of a skyscraper by getting at its foundational understructure to bring it down, so too with a society if you want to bring it down and replace it with something else. Much material in the Protocols (if you have ever actually and carefully considered their CONTENT) is devoted to various methods of subverting the foundations of a society – spiritually, psychologically, and materially. This is all done by multifarious methods of deception. If you cannot clearly see the close correlation between what is happening right now in the “modern world†and the blueprint found in the Protocols (whoever may have written or compiled them), then you need to educate yourself about the underlying structures and motivations behind current events, especially all that has happened on and since 9/11. Have you not read the Kissinger documents regarding the very real global eugenics plan now in place? Have you not read the statements of David Rockefeller regarding these things? It seems to me that you are either in a state of denial, or it is your “job†to come here and distract us from discussing the important issues of the day with endless talk about the now, completely irrelevant historical details of the Bolshevik revolution.
“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promise of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The super-national sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.â€
—David Rockefeller, at the 1991 Bilderberger meeting
“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.â€
—David Rockefeller
If you take the time to read them, this is all described in the Protocols quite clearly, and quite diabolically, and it is all happening right now before our very eyes. Now it is just a question of what side you wish to align yourself with, and I assure you that, although Evil is up by three touchdowns in the fourth quarter, the game is not over, and the side of Good is about to pull off a very BIG SURPRISE. The jaws of Hell surely await those who work as tools for the arrogant evildoers, and it is their pride which shall be their final downfall.
I am of the opinion that Patrick's tendency to obfuscation
which is undeniable and demonstrated again and again, is probably more of a personal problem than evidence of an overriding agenda. Patrick is a fount of detailed historical nitpickery and it's probably best to think of him as specialized resource rather than get hung up on his larger analyses. In other words, I think "McNallystein" is prolly uncalled for (though not unfunny in a distinctly un-PC way) and "McAspergers" more likely.
Hello to all from the Left Bank of Paris :)
> I am of the opinion that
> I am of the opinion that Patrick's tendency to obfuscation which is undeniable and demonstrated again and again
Obviously I can't pretend to respond to such a comment when no example is given. But as an indication of obfuscation I can best refer once more to the Protocols and show how sharply they contrast with the world of today:
Protocol 21 tells us that:
-----
When we ascend the throne all of these finances and similar shifts, as not being in accord with our interests, will be swept away so as not to leave a trace, as also will be destroyed all money markets... We shall replace the money markets by grandiose government credit institutions, the object of which will be to fix the price of industrial values in accordance with government views.
-----
I'll ask you to provide me with any information about an ongoing attempt to replace money markets with grandiose government credit institutions. Everything in the last 3 decades has been pointed in the opposite direction, i.e., privatization of government institutions. There's even an ongoing drive to turn social security (a government credit institution) over to the money markets, the exact opposite of what the Protocols preach. For someone to jump over such facts and claim that the Protocols are describing what we see around us today is obfuscation, pure and simple.
why not address my "third way" explanation of the Protocols?
The way you keep taking issue with what you perceive (incorrectly) to be a general consensus that the Protocols actually should be taken literally seems to indicate that I may be onto something. :)
I'm not really clear on what
I'm not really clear on what the "third way" is supposed to mean in this context. But your comment that the Protocols should not be taken literally conflicts with most attempts to propagate them. I've simply pointed out that the social agenda visualized in the Protocols, which begins to be described in Protocol 20 under the heading of "Financial Prgram," is diametrically opposite to all social trends of the last 30 years. What is clear is that the primary purpose of the Protocols was to be an attack on the various socialist and even liberal groups of that time in the 19th century. The description of the financial program of the alleged Elders clearly takes such ideas and smears them with a conspiratorial implication. Both Bush and Putin have abolished inheritance taxation. The Protocols identify the inheritance tax as part of their financial program.
If the current reports of research in old Russian archives are correct, it was Matvei Vasilyevich Golovinski who authored the copy of the Protocols which we read today:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matvei_Golovinski
I haven't seen enough details in English about this to be able to judge exactly yet. But in either case, whether the Protocols were written by Golovinski alone or given to him by someone else is a different issue from the claims that "the Protocols represent a blueprint for the 20th century." Your own assertion that they are not to be taken literally is a clear step back away from that. If they're not to be taken literally, then they're not a blueprint. We just wind up with the fact that several rather predictable events, which others had already predicted, such as the decline of Europe and the rise of Japan and the US, are again forecast in the Protocols. That's a far cry from being a blueprint for anything.
it's like pulling teeth with you...
How much more clear can I make myself? They were published and disseminated for a specific purpose--to frame the debate and cast support for Zionism as opposition to horrible Jew-conspiracy promoting people. And, I wager, to help Adolf Hitler properly drive his country into the ground while at the same time helping Zionists by rounding up the Jews they wanted to take to Palestine and scaring the rest into going voluntarily. Then to cap it all, an extermination myth is created to insure the new "state" against any and all criticism while it gobbles up land and wreaks havoc generally.
> Patrick, or Josh, or
> Patrick, or Josh, or Chaim, or whatever your real name might be
Unlike yourself, I use my real name rather openly without hiding it away.
> Why is it that you refuse to discuss any of the actual CONTENT found in the Protocols
I have discussed the actual content of the Protocols many times in many contexts, and have pointed out that they carry no resemblance to what is going on today. More specifically, the Protocols were written at a time when socialist movements were strong and they were scripted with an eye towards smearing such movements. For this reason the Protocols advocate a program based upon taxing the wealthy capital and using such wealth to support social services. The theme is that once the Learned Elders are in power it will be necessary to make sure that the ordinary masses never have anything to grumble about and so heavy taxation of capital gains will be used to support a range of facilities and activities which will keep the masses contented. During an earlier era when the Roosevelt administration was advocating things such as social security this was often held up by Right-wingers as a carrying out of the Protocols. But nobody who honestly looks at the program which has taken hold since Ronald Reagan took office is going to maintain that it bears any relation to the Protocols. Where the Protocols explicitly advocate taxation on capital, George Bush overtly removes such taxation. Where the Protocols emphasize the need for the new rulers to maintain some level of social services to keep the public contented, we've seen a systematic effort to strip away social security and transfer all remaining funds over to Halliburton.
If one is seeking to judge a question such as to what extent are the Protocols really more of an actual revelation of something or other than, say, Joly's Dialogues (or multiple other literary works by Dumas and similar authors which preceded Joly), then one should seek to identify the points which distinguish the Protocols.
For example, in the Twenty-First Dialogue Joly has Machiavelli preaching the idea that:
-----
It [the state] can refinance all its uncovered debts in just the same way--treasury bonds, debts owed to municpalities and banks. This applies just to all debts that form a part of what is rather picturesquely called "the floating debt," that is, debts that have no fixed basis and which mature in the more or less distant future... Far from dreading a policy that sees the national debt increase and constantly refinanced, I would want the entire public fortune tied to government bonds... Every last cent in my kingdom would depend on my continued existence.
-----
In contrast, Protocol 21 tells us that:
-----
... nowadays all internal loans are consolidated by so-called flying loans, that is, such as have terms of payment more or less near... If left for long at the disposition of a government these funds evaporate in the payment of interest on foreign loans... When we ascend the throne all of these finances and similar shifts, as not being in accord with our interests, will be swept away so as not to leave a trace, as also will be destroyed all money markets... We shall replace the money markets by grandiose government credit institutions, the object of which will be to fix the price of industrial values in accordance with government views.
-----
Clearly the picture drawn in the Dialogues is much closer to our reality in the last 25 years, although I don't think that one can really understand the modern world by leaning very much on literary fictions from a century ago. Still, Joly's picture of a government that constantly refinances itself with an increasing national debt is much more related to what we've seen for a few decades now than is the image of drawn in the Protocols of money markets being abolished. These are exactly the types of discrepancies which a logical inquiry into the question of whether or not the Protocols were really a blueprint for the 20th century should address.
One very important background cultural influence in making possible the agenda of the Reagan administration was the fact that Right-wing voters had been influenced by such themes as:
-----
Protocol No. 20
From this follows that taxation will best be covered by a progressive tax on property. In this manner the dues will be paid without straitening or ruining anybody in the form of a percentage of the amount of property. The rich must be aware that it is their duty to place a part of their superfluities at the disposal of the State since the State guarantees them security of possession of the rest of their property and the right of honest gains. I say honest, for the control over property will do away with robbery on a legal basis. The social reform must come from above, for the time is ripe for it -- it is indispensable as a pledge of peace. The tax upon the poor man is a seed of revolution and works to the detriment of the state which in hunting after the trifling is missing the big... A tax increasing in percentage ratio to capital will give a much larger venue than the present individual or property tax... The force upon which our king will rest consists in the equilibrium and the guarantee of peace, for the sake of which things it is indispensable that the capitalists should yield up a portion of their incomes for the sake of the secure working of the machinery of the State. State needs must be paid by those who will not feel the burden and have enough to take from...
-----
This is diametrically the opposite of what the USA has seen since 1980. Many ordinary conservative voters who supported the cuts on capital gains carried out by the Bush administration were strongly influenced by cultural influences, some of whose message is derived from this theme in Protocol No. 20. If the Elders believe that they must set up taxes "increasing in percentage ratio to capital," then abolishing the capital gains tax will be a way of thwarting the Elders. Only now we have to deal with the mess that has been created by this.
> That is why he has waged
> That is why he has waged war against the Jewish oligarch crime syndicate who ruined Russia (with the support of Clinton)
Putin's role in Russia actually has a close parallel with Clinton's role here. When Clinton took office the Reaganite push for privatization had created enough instability that a moderate hand was needed to smooth it out. Clinton solidified the Reaganite accomplishments. Putin has in the last years been solidifying Yeltsin's achievements. Official statistics show 60,000 homeless in Petersburg alone. According to research published in November of last year by the Institute of the Socio-Economic Problems of the Population (ISEPP) at the Russian Academy of Sciences, the current taxation and social system in Russia benefits 20 percent of the wealthiest and disfavors the poor. Over the last six years, that is, under Putin, the incomes of 10 percent of the wealthiest citizens grew at a rate that significantly outstripped the growth rate of the GDP, while they shouldered a tax burden that was much lower in comparison with the impoverished layers of society. None of this is so dramatically different from what occurs within the US empire today. Russia is a lesser imperial state, and not as much of an interventionist power as the US, but it's false to present what goes on there as drastically different from what occurs in the larger world.