Reprehensor coins a new term - "Suddenly Blossoming Holocaust Truther" (SBHT)
In a long screed by Reprehensor titled On Disinformation and Damaging Associations, Reprehensor includes "SBHT" as one of the 3 most damaging and dangerous topics that he must now take "a firmer, (and admittedly glaringly late), stance" against - the other two being Fakery and DEW. This is an update of his April letter to bloggers on 911Blogger titled Editorial Direction at 911Blogger, when he "noted that certain topics would no longer be tolerated [at 911blogger]".
Reprehensor begins with a long diatribe against Fakery and DEW to establish his credentials as a champion protecting the movement against the onslaught of blatent disinfo that 911Blogger has been subject to (but no more!). He admits that sites like 911blogger.com have been slow to label blatant disinformation as such and so he now has to put his foot down. He ends the article with the threat of "SBHT" that must be neutralized:
Finally, on a different track, there is the phenomenon of "Suddenly Blossoming Holocaust Truther" (SBHT) syndrome. Truthers who don't talk of their obsession with proving that the holocaust of WWII is a "hoax", until AFTER they have wormed their way into your community. The most clear cut example of this is of course Eric Hufschmid. (Jim Hoffman's 911review.com tells the basic tale here.)***
The general pattern is as follows, the "Holocaust Truther" makes friends and allies within your 9/11 community, even publishes a great book or video, (in Hufschmid's case, both a book and a video), and after a period of time (after the work of the Holocaust Truther has been disseminated and quoted widely) the real Truther is revealed.
What is one of the most popular 9/11 Truth videos on the street right now?
Arguably, Sofia Shafquat's "911 Mysteries".
Sofia Shafquat is currently selling "The Ernst Zundel Story" at her online store.
I repeat; One of the highest profile 9/11 Truth websites is selling an Ernst Zundel documentary. This has been going on for months. [Yes...And...what's wrong with that?]
When you consider the attention that the Simon Wiesenthal Center has paid to the 9/11 Truth movement, and AE911Truth.org in particular, you have to seriously consider the intentions of such a move.
Is Sofia Shafquat giving us a head's up about her future research?
Her store also distributes The Science and Politics of 9/11 - 2007 Conference DVD, which documents a conference in Madison, Wisconsin conducted late last summer (2007) that promoted the disinformation of the Fakers, and the non-hypothesis of DEW.
When the Financial Times of London did its first major piece on the 9/11 Truth movement, it zeroed in on the Madison conference as a wellspring of hit-piece source material;
Quote:
...Fetzer was off to that seat of academic respectability, Yale University. To prepare for our meeting, I watched a DVD of a 9/11 symposium he held in his new hometown of Madison, Wisconsin last year. The star of this show was Alfred Lambremont Webre, a judge on former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad's alternative international War Crimes Tribunal in Kuala Lumpur and co-author of the Space Preservation Treaty. He delivers what might be the most momentous opening line in the history of town hall seminars. "Fellow Citizens... 9/11 was a false flag operation by an international war crimes racketeering organisation to provide a pretext to engage in a genocidal and ecocidal depleted uranium bombing of central Asia, Afghanistan and Iraq in order to secure vast oil and uranium reserves; to roll out a terror-based national security state system worldwide and ... to implement the final stages of a world depopulation policy." There are two more "false flag" operations in the pipeline, he says. The first is the war against asteroids, the second the "war against the evil aliens".
Hearing this, you either experience the thrill of revelation or the sinking feeling that the person you are listening to is having some kind of breakdown. Within 30 minutes, Webre has folded into the 9/11 plot the Skull & Bones society at Yale University or the "Brotherhood of Death", as he calls it neocon think-tank the Council on Foreign Relations, the Rothschilds, the Queen and the City of London. I wondered how all these conspiracies could be maintained without the whole conceit unravelling.
The answer, of course, is that there is only one conspiracy. Pearl Harbour, the moon landing, JFK, 9/11, the Illuminati, the Black Helicopters, Skull & Bones, chemtrails: all faces of the same demon. The plot goes all the way to the top, and all the way back in time. You could come to believe that it involves everyone except yourself at which point it's all over for you. And as I listened, I just waited for him to say the Word. And, inevitably, Webre brought it all back to the "international neo-Zionist organisation".
I asked Fetzer about this as we sat in a cafe across from Yale, home of the Brotherhood of Death: how did he keep his scholars on message? "It's obvious to me that you have to consider all the possible alternatives," he says. "You can't exclude any, lest, as you proceed in your investigation and eliminate hypotheses, you eliminate the true hypothesis because you've never allowed it to be considered."
Yes, you CAN exclude some. The most improbable, the most unlikely, the impossible, the absurd ... grossly obvious disinformation, you CAN exclude this nonsense from your 9/11 horizons.
You can also exclude the proponents and promoters of this nonsense, because they only poison the well of 9/11 Truth.
I wonder if Reprehensor will ever take a "strong stance" against the blatent disinformation of the LIHOPers with their pushing the completely discredited hijacker backstory that is, besides being even more physically impossible than the fakery disinfo, also results in the genocidal wars against the Arab/Muslim population that has already led to the deaths of millions and threatens to initiate WWIII?
- Keenan's blog
- Login to post comments
SBHT backwards stands for The Holocaust Bull Shit
Which of course could refer to the actual official holocaust narrative or the stink that people like Reprehensor make about it. It seems that since 9/11 was apparently a Zionist hoax, some people worry that once the truth is revealed other Zionist hoaxes will receive a lot more attention, and cries of "anti-semite!" are unlikely at that point to do anything but encourage people and alert them that they are on the right track.
I think that SBHT is a real phenomenon, but it isn't quite as simple as Reprecensor makes it. Yes, people like Hufschmid seem to wrap 9/11 in a lot of other stuff to make it hard for people to swallow. This not only serves to help the cover-up, but also helps fake truthers to gain credibility for their fake truthing AND to protect the holocaust narrative from scrutiny resulting from awareness of Zionist agency in 9/11.
What we've learned from the 9/11 movement is that deception is multi-layered and not as straightforward as a president lying about whether he had sex with that woman. The idea is that multiple "sides" are created in order to create ostensible diversity--the appearance of a legitimate debate from which one side is pre-ordained to emerge victorious--that side of course being the one that most benefits the real perpetrators. This can involve a total cover-up or a limited hangout fingering old or new patsies and fall guys. As long as the debate is controlled in this way the cover-up will succeed in part by making confusion and division the order of the day.
All of the tactics used by the fake truth element of the cover-up are well worn tactics of the world's historical conspirators. Playing both sides of a conflict is a sure way to end up winning. Sowing divisions among your enemies so that they destroy each other for you is also a great way to avoid confrontations you couldn't win directly or openly. By understanding that the cover-up will reflect, in miniature, the crime and the criminals MO we learn a lot about identifying who is real and who is fake.
Finally, I wonder if Sofia isn't just playing straw man for this SBHT crap. After all, Ernst Zundel is one of the least sympathetic holocaust critics out there, seeing as how he is a genuine neo-Nazi. Is Sofia also offering the videos of David COle, the Jewish revisionist threatened into recanting by the terrorist Jewish Defense League? If not, why not? Why promote someone like Zundel over someone like Cole when their basic arguments about the holocaust are essentially the same? Just because Reprehensor criticizes her doesn't make her a good guy any more than it does Nico Haupt and the no-planers. Nor does it necessarily mean she is a bad guy. We should judge anyone and everyone by their fruits. 9/11 Mysteries was pretty good fruit. Ernst Zundel promotion not so much. 911Blogger consistently bears LIHOP fruit. The fake left mainstream antiwar movement has not managed to stop any wars. By their fruits you shall know them.
speaking of blowhard shills.......
Col. Jenny(or super disinfo cop#1!) is getting all self-righteous and know it all on us again as she sets up and knocks down the obvious disinfo tools(Nico,Killtown, blah blah) while trying to build her cred. she also takes a shot at RT:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/17427
 i know i say it all the time, but "disinfo" professionals like Arabesque and the Col. are extremely suspect in my mind. no problem with pointing out disinfo, but making a career out of it makes for a pretty good shield in my opinion....
"some noplaners are just people...
who happen to believe in noplanes." >snif< it brings notears to my noeyes to read such beautiful nosentiments coming from Col. Nosparks. So basically she is saying "now that our cover-up has failed and the fake truth movement has to take its show on stage before a live global audience, what say we stop insulting you and you stop exposing our charade?"
Col. Jenny, you are too funny.
This is merely because she's hot for Genghis
who, although a no-planer, is also a scrawny young (not quite young enough, but he'll do) lad she imagines would want her to be on top all the time.
As for being a full-time disinfo operative, being unemployed certainly helps, although it does cut into her comic-book reading time.
i think she falls under the UI category...
That is, useful idiot. Right now her epic post has three comments on it, and two of them are hers. Looks like 911Blogger and Truefaction appreciate her zealous support of the fake truthers but they don't quite find her "front page worthy". Anyway, she provides some welcome comic relief (no pun intended) but we shouldn't get sucked into a feud with her any more than it is worth fighting over a scrap of meat with a dog... I will say that I checked out http://jewmoonhoax.com and I am not terribly impressed with what I found...
Col. Jenny is apparently so lost in her tangled web of hypocrisy
she has had to weave in order for her to continue with her obsession with being popular with the actually unpopular Clique of LIHOPer Thought Police shills who now coincidently and inexplicably (or, in fact, very explicably and very predictably) control and censor most 9/11 forums, that she has completely lost her ability to objectively see her own (and her adopted LIHOPer Clique's) hypocritical behavior on everything she complains about.
Since none of us can respond to such stinky piles of doggy poo on "her" 911-LIHOP-GATEKEEPER.COM forums anymore, I'll take the opportunity here on our "jewmoonhoax.com" forum to respond to some of her "bollox" and "shite".
From http://www.911blogger.com/node/17427, Super Cop Sparks proposes the following:
So here's the proposal-- The Big Fence:
1-We keep to our forums, you keep to yours.
2-If we decide to cross post, we do it respecting the differing goals of our forums. We agree to disagree INSTEAD of personal attacks.
3- We respect each others privacy as private persons, and criticize public figures for unethical behavior, not belief.
4- needless to say, theories remain fair game, as is behavior. No one gets a pass on criminal or unethical behavior.
5-remember, banning distruptors is not censorship--its keeping your forum clean. Better a straight honest banning, than festering poison and bad feeling.
1) Let's start with the fact that the vast majority of 9/11 researchers and activists reject LIHOP. Therefore, you and your unelected Clique of LIHOP Bullies have absolutely have no legitimate claim to policing and steering the 9/11 truth movement, at all. Not even a shred or one iota of legitimate authority. Zilch.
2) When have you ever been willing to hold any members of your tiny little Clique of LIHOP Bullies to the same standards of behavior that you listed above? Jon Gold, JohnA, Victronix, Johndorami, Arabesque, and most other members of your unelected clique have all engaged in uncivil personal attacks against other forum members - even including violating the privacy of private persons (the treatment of jpass on 911Blogger by Jon Gold is only one example) who don't subscribe to the LIHOP BOLLOX (and who, in fact, represent the majority of opinion of the 9/11 movement).
3) "No one gets a pass on criminal or unethical behavior."
Let's just talk about your friend Arabesque for a moment. How many times has Arabesque been caught engaging in that very behavior, using the weapons of anonymous alleged emails that Arabesque could not verify, unsubstantiated and baseless charges against his detractors (Lelend, all the members of Citizens Investigative Team(CIT), etc.) that later had to be (or should have been but wasn't) dropped, and that, no matter how many times he was caught doing this, has never been held to account by you or your other members of this clique?
4) "banning disruptors is not censorship - its keeping your forum clean". Uh huh...right! The problem here, is that your Clique of LIHOP Bullies has defined anyone who doesn't subscribe to your LIHOP Bollox as "disruptive". A perfect example (among too any to list) was the mass banning last May of every member of CIT (Craig Ranke, Aldo, Dm, etc) on 911Blogger who attempted to present evidence - to the horror of the LIHOP Gang - obtained from their own investigations and visits in Arlington, Virginia, that proves that the OCT of AA77 having crashed into the Pentagon was impossible. The pattern was a familiar one. Arabesque and other LIHOPer Thugs provoked and attacked and abused CIT members until they reacted against this unwarranted abuse, at which point they were all - EVERY MEMBER OF CIT - banned for being "disruptive"! If by "keeping your forum clean" you mean keeping it clean of those who would dissent from the unpopular LIHOP Thought Police, then I can see why you think "banning disruptors" is so important to you fake truthers. Do you realize, however, just how transparent such bully tactics of your Thought Police Clique are to everyone else?
I could go on, but I think it's pretty obvious at this point which unelected group of thugs and hypocrits that represents such a tiny fraction of the 9/11 truth movement, has successfully hijacked the movement - at least the web version of it if not the real world version - in order to push their own unpopular and fringe "theories" that preserve the core of the 9/11 PSYOP of the fairy tale of the 19 "Islamofascist plastic knife and boxcutter ninja hijackers" that no seasoned 9/11 truther believes in any more for the last approximately 5 years now.
Get a friggin clue, Ms Col. Jenny SupperCopEgoObsessedDesperateToBePartOfTheClique Sparks!