Michael Hoffman and revisionisthistory.org
Don't know much about him, but I do like these statements quite a bit... anyone have a take, positive or negative?Â
Copyright Notice
Legal Notice, Disclaimer & Mission Statement
The founding spirit of the Internet is encapsulated in the following Enlightenment proverb, "I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." Let's not lose sight of this principle, as obscenely wealthy corporations which have grown rich milking the Internet's openness, submit cowardly to Zionist thought-police who fear alternative information and dissent, and push ruthlessly for a politically correct online world. Who are the "haters"? They are the bigots who hate the free circulation of dissenting information.
In order to silence or obstruct the flow of information from this website, Judaic religious fanatics irresponsibly allege that RevisionistHistory.org is a "hate site." This is tantamount to a papal fanatic stating that a website dedicated to disseminating critical information about the Roman Catholic Church is an anti-Italian "hate site." It's clearly a pretext for obstructing data and documentation which rabbinic zealots execrate. It is libelous to claim that RevisionistHistory.org is a "hate site." Read the following statements by Michael A. Hoffman II and discover the truth for yourself.
____________________________________
I. Of "Zionist Jews" and "Zionist Aryans"
II. On "White Supremacy"
III. Mission Statement
_________________________________
Of Zionist "Jews" and Zionist "Aryans"
by Michael A. Hoffman II
Open Letter to Michael Santomauro re: "Zionist Jews Dominate U.S. War Machine"
Dear Mr. Santomauro: Why drag "Jews" into this equation? You do the work of the rabbis by such tactics. If you are talking about Zionists then stick with that classification. It is gratuitous and racist to mix "Jews" into the equation. You are well aware that there are Judaics who are anti-Zionist, anti-rabbi, pro-freedom and even pro-Arab.
By tying "Jews" into the Zionist equation you serve as a recruiter for the Talmud, Midrash and Kabbalah, all of which teach that there is no mercy or love for Jews among the goyim; that it is "impossible for the goyim not to hate the Jews," because "Halacha hu beyadua sheEsav soneh leYaakov." The Hitlers and the Henry Fords played into the hands of the rabbis by confirming this racial maxim of theirs. Hitler and Ford were, in this way, unconscious allies and agents of the rabbis!
Right now the rabbis are telling Judaic people that all criticism of the Israeli state is a "thinly veiled attack on Jews themselves." You uphold this tale when you use the term "Zionist Jews" in a pejorative sense.
In your campaign for peace and justice in the Middle East, make certain you do not fulfill the prophecies of the rabbis and thereby drive fence-sitting Judaics into rabbinic arms. We need Judaics in the first ranks of freedom and truth-loving people. To make them welcome we must not resort to categories which will only make them feel collectively targeted no matter what they do or how they behave.
I am not here advocating weasel words, mealy-mouth responses or compromise of any kind. There can be no compromise with the truth! What I am expressing here is a radical and defiant truth: if we want to succeed and win the war for Truth we will have to stop imitating Hitler and Henry Ford who were little more than players acting out assigned roles in a Purim pageant.
There are many tens of thousands of "Jews" who want to join us, but to do so they may have to burn their bridges in their own shetls. They will never sever those ties and allegiances if they harbor suspicion that at some point after they have entered our community we will ultimately turn on them after we have contained Zionism and Talmudism.
If you truly want to defeat the rabbis and the Zionists, then love Judaic people with all your heart and avoid language which suggests a hidden agenda or animus.
Yes, there are many dual-loyalty "Zionists" in the Bush administration, beginning with the premiere Israeli-first traitor, the preppie WASP Yale blueblood George W. Bush. Perle and Wolfowitz can't remotely compete with the level of betrayal Bush represents. There is an epigram from the Early Church: "Judas was the most grievous traitor because He knew who Jesus was and sold him anyway."
The fault is not with the "Jews," Horatio, but with the "Aryan" proclivity to sell out that which the "Aryans" know is the truth. Our war is with that proclivity, and not with any scapegoated ethnicity.
The more you hunt and single out an ethnic because of his ethnicity ("Zionist Jews") the more you make a fugitive, saint and martyr of him.
This principle also works against the rabbis. Today they have largely lost the tremendous sympathy for Judaism which Hitler's atrocities garnered and which led to United Nations Resolution 181 in November of 1947, effectively founding the Israeli state.
Now in our day, Judaism and Zionism have seen that sympathy eroded due to the contemporary rabbinic and Zionist tendency to scapegoat and racially caricature Arabs and Muslims -- thereby turning Arabs and Muslims into hunted fugitives, victims and Amalekites --a targeting that startles and disgusts most Europeans. Some of the older and more cunning rabbis are warning against this role reversal and chutzpah in their private councils, but the grinning Dershowitzes, Foxmans and Kristols are heedless.
There are both conscious and unconscious Zionist and rabbinic agents in pro-Palestinian and revisionist ranks. These agents are determined to reimpose the exhausted and failed psychology and paradigm of Jew hatred under various semi-respectable guises. This tendency must be combatted not on humanitarian or liberal grounds, but because it will lead to a dead-end, a repeat of history, a path to the treadmill of endless, rerun defeat for us and our Cause.
There are hundreds of thousands of Judaics who feel severely oppressed and threatened by Judaism and Zionism and who seek escape and liberation; who were raised as "frum Yiddin" in settings of unimaginable despotism and claustrophobic micro-management of their lives. We, who should be their harborers and liberators, only drive them back into the arms of their oppressors when we single "Jews" out for any sort of special animus.
We are not fighting genes or blood or a race; those are Talmudic and Kabbalistic obsessions clandestinely conveyed into our civilization by means of the Social-Darwinist and Hitlerian belt of transmission. Originally this racism was a rabbinic meme, reflecting the ancient megalomania of the Pharisaic sect at Jerusalem.
We are fighting not a race of people but a spiritual and ideological toxin, which infects Judaics and gentiles with equal virulence. These spiritual toxins are the dogmas embodied within Orthodox Judaism, war-Zionism and their various step-children in the Western occult as personified by Hitler's hero, the Kabbalist Giordano Bruno, as well as Pico della Mirandola, Reuchlin, Dee, Pike, Crowley and their infernal Rosicrucian, Masonic and OTO branches, including the Skull and Bones demonology of George W. Bush, who was initiated in New Haven, CT in 1968. (This writer owns a photocopy of the official Skull and Bones --"Russell Trust" -- roll, giving Bush's date of initiation and biography).
When the great French writer and virtuoso anti-rabbinic polemicist, L.F. Céline, wandered the salons of Paris during the Nazi occupation, he was invited to speak at various anti-Jewish conferences, where Judaics were denounced with great fervor. He sat in the back of the room at one such gathering, disgruntled and mumbling imprecations. Thinking Celine resentful because he was in the rear, the organizers invited him to come up to the dais and join the assembled Vichy dignitaries as they denounced "Jewish bullsh**t." But Celine only stood up and shouted, "What about Aryan bulls**t? Why don't you talk about that for a change?" and then he stalked off.
In that spirit, I ask, what about the "Zionist Aryans"? Why are they seldom, if ever, singled out for special opprobrium? There is something sinister about a movement that seems to invent alibis for a whole class of Judas goats like Rumsfeld, Ashcroft, Scalia, Bill Gates, Admiral Poindexter, Bush Sr. and Jr.-- in government, the corporations and the lodges -- who, in their treachery, surpass any Zionist Judaic. It is as if the evil of the Aryans is accidental, merely a mistake and not at all indicative of a deep malaise in the soul of Western man which we must scrutinize and expose if we are ever to be rid of it.
Most literature professors misread "Oliver Twist" and imagine that Charles Dickens' supreme villain is the Judaic Fagin. But it was Monks, Oliver's half-brother, who Dickens portrayed as the embodiment of the more malignant evil. Dickens was offering a modern corrective to a medieval morality play along with profound insight into a supposed hereditary Judaic enemy. Dickens sought to demonstrate that Fagin's animosity for gentiles was far surpassed in heinous perversion by the one who turns against his own brother, as Monks did to Oliver.
Nowadays our movement's principal exhortations are against "Zionist Jews." But like Fagin in his kidnapping of Oliver Twist, "Zionist Jews" couldn't have gotten to square one in the abduction of America had not the Zionist Aryans--like Monks-- sold their American brothers down the glatt kosher sewer of this "money-get mechanic age" for the requisite 30 shekels. Who then is the more dangerous and who merits the more strenuous reproach, censure and vigilance?
As long as we refuse the knowledge of the equilibrium we can't possibly win; instead we sentence ourselves to acting a role in Purimfest, forever.
I teach you "apikorus," i.e. that which is forbidden you -- the knowledge of the equilibrium. This too was Jesus' "crime."
Hoffman on "White Supremacy"
The white race --at least in its current degenerate state as manifested in modern America-- is now the golem of the rabbis. Without the unstinting financial and military support of America's white leaders and white voters, the Israeli Zionists would not have one-tenth their power in the world today.
As Dr. Tony Martin, professor of African History at Wellesley College elucidated in his videotaped lecture The Judaic Role in the Black Slave Trade, the root of anti-black racism is found in the Midrashic exegesis concerning Noah's son, Ham. This insidious rabbinic doctrine in turn influenced Freemasons and masonic sympathizers within and outside the Ku Klux Klan (most notably Wesley Swift of "Seedline Identity"), who taught the specious dogma that there is a Biblical basis for anti-black racism, when in fact anti-black racism emanates from the rabbis of Judaism, including the "greatest of them all" Maimonides, and not the Patriarchs of the Old Testament.
The supremacy of whites in America such as George W. Bush, Donald Rumsefeld, Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush, George Bush Sr., Justice Antonin Scalia, the Speaker of the House, the Senate Majority Leader, the Governor of New York etc. is synonymous with the rise of Judaic supremacy. I repudiate white supremacy and Judaic supremacy with every ounce of my being.
Mission Statement
The Revisionist Mission
"It is always the inclination of man to deny reality, to tidy things up, to wrap perception in the pretty party ribbon of partisanship and prejudice. It is the fate of the revisionist historian to forever wander the frontiers beyond party and dogma, cognizant of the original sin of his own subjectivity, but always struggling to see more, and give an account of what he sees with an utter disregard for the consequences of so fugitive a vocation.
"Even at this juncture, information is not enough. For the key to getting as close to the truth as we can depends not on obtaining the most information, but rather, in honing our ability to detect fraud. Information is power, but it is not wisdom. "Revisionist history consists in the art of discerning fraud and the courage to publicly strip illusion, even when the whole world is clamoring violently for it."
Home | News Bureau | Bookstore | Hoffman's Columns | Essays
More Columns | Archives | Donations | Mission Statement
Copyright©2006-2008. All Rights Reserved
- gretavo's blog
- Login to post comments
Hmmmm...
There are both conscious and unconscious Zionist and rabbinic agents in pro-Palestinian and revisionist ranks. These agents are determined to reimpose the exhausted and failed psychology and paradigm of Jew hatred under various semi-respectable guises. This tendency must be combatted not on humanitarian or liberal grounds, but because it will lead to a dead-end, a repeat of history, a path to the treadmill of endless, rerun defeat for us and our Cause.
I realize that I initially misread the first couple of sentences, which made it impossible for me to understand the last, but it's kind of interesting that I did. I see now that he's talking about people with actual judaeophobic tendencies, conscious or unconscious discomfort with people who identify as Jewish, or who at least play that on tv. What I thought he was referring to was another phenomenon, whereby some anti-Zionists feel compelled to keep alive the specter of judaeophobia in a way that amplifies its force, seeing a Jew-sniffing hater under every bed. In a strange way, it reminds me of that certain class of homophobe, who perceives gayness as just so damn tempting, revealing that it holds much more power over them than over the average (straight) person they are trying to protect.
I think what he's saying is...
what some of us have been saying here for some time--that certain people DEPEND on jew-hatred for their livelihood and therefore make an effort to seed various social movements with jew hating memes. Hufschmid, for example, with his obsession with "crypto-Jews" might be a conscious or unconscious example. Hoffman means that the distinction has to be clearly made between both secular and religious--i.e. Zionist and Judaic--manipulators on the one hand and "Jewish identity and culture" on the other and that some people see it as their goal to prevent such a distinction from being made, and they try to achieve that goal by encouraging people (admittedly those near the bottom of the barrel intellectually) to "hate all the Jews" so that "all the Jews" who would otherwise not be drawn to either Zionism OR Judaism (just like people everywhere who increasingly shun self-marginalization on religious or nationalistis terms) have one last reason to not assimiliate into the melting pot of global humanity. Of course Hoffman as a catholic has his own issues along those lines, but the sense I get is that his own issues have a lot to do with reacting to what he sees as the success of the bizarre fusion of Judaic messianism with Zionist nationalism. To which I would add, a near perfect parallel exists in the fusion of American evangelical protestantism and traditional American "Manifest Destiny" Jingo-Imperialism (both of which, incidentally, are exploited by neoconservatism these days...) Problematic is Hoffman, yes. But quite thought provokingly so in my opinion! Oh, and I assume that the pornographic element of the Talmud he alludes to includes (probably most prominently) the whole "breaking the hymen of a girl under 7 does not affect her virginity because the hymen regenerates when they're that young" which could of course just be yet another example of Talmudic rabbis coming up with a bizarre sounding scenario to make a point about how to interpret the "Law" laid down by Yaweh, i.e. not an actual seal (no pun intended) of approval applied to pedophilia which of course is how "jew haters" routinely interpret it. There may be other examples of pornography, I intend to do some more research. :)
No argument here... to the first part of your post
Huffschmidianism seems like an inarguable fact to me. But do you see what I mean in terms of my misreading? I think there is a faction -- and they must be crypto-somethings-or-other -- who are hung up past reason on "sniffing out" the judaeophobia of people who give no indication of being Jew-haters outside of a critique of the role of Jewish identity in Zionism. (And yes, there certainly is one: Jewish identity in all its problematic ethno-religio-ambiguity is THE means for invoking privilege under a system of Zionism, just as "whiteness" is a means for invoking privilege in white supremacist societies such as ours.) Ya know what I'm saying?
well, isn't it the same thing?
Hoffman says that some do it intentionally and some just have that effect (ensuring the perception of persistent inherent jew hatred in non Jews) without intending to, which is the category into which I would put what you're talking about. Bottom line is that by constantly spotting and pointing out what they believe to be judeophobia they enact a kind of self-fulfilling prophecy whereby certain types of people are given the perfect opportunity to point out the behavior as an example of "the perfidy of jews". People who constantly raise the specter of "the NEWâ„¢ anti-semitism" may or may not do it knowingly. Some people like Abe Foxman and the ADL do it quite consciously for a living, fully aware and scheming. Others simply do it because they become convinced by the pros like Foxman that the NEWâ„¢ anti-semitism is a real and growing problem. Actually funding right wing groups, or directly infiltrating them is one way to lend credence to the persistence of irrational visceral jew hatred, another is the fairly common practice of "false-flag desecration" of Jewish graves, buildings, etc.
And as for the second...
I'm thinking he may be hung up on the sexual metaphors in Kabbala -- with all the "marrying" of the son to the daughter or however it is described, which is just good ol' fashioned sacred sexuality. The idea of the hierogamos has been around from time immemorial.
you and your autocthonous hierogamos...
I think it has more to do with stuff in the talmud than the kabbalah. I remember reading somewhere that in order to convert a woman would have to be examined in a ritual bath by three rabbis, for example (possibly to screen out vagina dentatae?) My problem is not so much with colorful traditions like that (if true) it is with the hypocrisy of casting aspersions at pretty much any other religion (by any number of people) but treating legitimate critique of Judaism as necessarily hateful. It's that double standard that I have a problem with. That said, I think it is perfectly appropriate to criticize religious practices. Animal sacrifices to Yaweh particularly stressing the offering of the animals' blood was practiced routinely in the days of the Temple in Jerusalem. A lot of the Jewish "canon" has to do with describing how exactly this must be done, how much animal was expected for certain blessings, etc. I find that to barbaric, frankly, and I'm glad that Judaism has moved beyond it. Of course instead of dealing with this straightforward fact, the debate is more often framed along the lines of jew-haters saying that jews did and still do sacrifice gentile children in the same way (the so-called "blood libel") and others pointing out what a wicked and unfounded accusation that is. Of course it's not that surprising that someone would make the accusation given that a) jewish tradition did in the past include animal sacrifice and bloodletting and b) the talmud does in parts cite some particularly impolitic rabbis comparing gentiles to animals. But how many people understand any of this, let alone KNOW any of it?
Uhhh...
This guy seems pretty problematic to me. My initial impression is that he has delineated some novel ways to tease out issues of Jewish identity from Zionist politics and put the emphasis on the latter. BUT, then you come across something like this:
But Revelation of the Method being what it is in our time, even positive confirmation that the Talmud blasphemes Our Savior and His Mother and possesses allegiance to an extra-Biblical gnosis, has elicited controverting apologia from prominent rabbis, all of whom seek to “contextualize†these revelations about the contents of the Talmud by placing them in a framework of a Roman Holocaust/Nazi Holocaust typology that renders Judaism’s defamation of Christianity as "understandable" from the point of view of post-modernism's acceptance of the rabbinic exceptionalism clause: Judaic suffering is magnitudes above the historic experience of other nations. Therefore, fierce rabbinic hatred for Romans/gentiles/Christians/Europeans has at times been understandable, if "harsh." To overcome this rabbinic line, we need to plumb the depths of the rabbinic texts and not content ourselves with detection of the degenerate libels of Jesus Christ and the Blessed Virgin Mary which these texts contain.
I am very wary of anyone who gets their panties in a bunch over issues of "libeling" Jesus and Mary -- moreover, he also alludes to criticism of the Talmud for its "pornographic" content (which I interpret as meaning content that is sexual in a way he does not approve of). Bear in mind, too, that the Jesus/Mary "libel" is the suggestion that Mary was a free woman sexually -- and although I'm sure plenty of Talmudists intend that suggestion to be denigrating, that doesn't make it so.
And then there's this book description...
Witches and Rabbis: Legacy of the Reagan White House
Witches and Rabbis: Legacy of the Reagan White House Counters an ocean of revolting hype about Reagan, emanating from schizophrenic "Conservatives" who have been leading Americans from one disaster to another with their double-minded insanity. Here is the dossier that shatters the Reagan myth and declares the truth about the "Great Betrayer." Contents: Reagan’s Kosher Cash Cow; Greatest Presidential Friend of the Israelis; Patron Saint of the Holohoax Lobby; Reagan the Liar; The Witch of the White House; Reagan: Sponsor of Martin Luther King; Reagan, Bankers & the U.S. as Cheap Labor Colony; Menachem Schneerson: Reagan’s False Messiah; Saddam’s Ally--Reagan; The “Commie Fighter†who worked for the Commies. Pamphlet, illustrated, 16 pages. $ 5.00
Aren't some of these things not like the others?
well I think you need to go to the source...
It's not quite as simnple as Hoffman being offended by the Talmud's lliberal views on sexuality. Jesus and Mary are apparently common foils in the Talmud (unsurprisingly) and not just treated liberally but with clear visceral hatred and contempt. This is not entirely surprising and indeed the vicious cycle has historically reared its head as polemicists on both sides of the judaic/christian divide have exploited the animosity. It has to be remembered that Talmudic Judaism began with a certain line of rabbis exiled in Babylon after the time of Jesus, who also set down the Torah in writing from the first time. This fact supports the view that the Jewish/Christian schism could have involved a lot more intelligent design as opposed to just being a random evolutionary cultural process. It's interesting after all that both Judaism and Christianity spread around the world to most of all the same places together, almost as if they feed off each other and their conflict. Maybe that's the point? Maybe there HAS been a long standing hidden tradition dating from around the same time that "manages" that conflict? I think that's the "mother of all conspiracy theories" according to some--the one that traces Illuminism, etc. back to Babylon (i.e. Iraq). Could it be as much about this patrimony as it is about oil?
another example of bizarreness in the talmud
Just got Jesus in the Talmud by Peter Schafer, a Princeton prof. This is by no means even close to being a jew hating book on the subject--quite the opposite in fact. Anyway, according to the Talmud Jesus is indeed in hell as we speak sitting in boiling excrement. Could be worse, though--the "Jewish arch enemies" Titus and Balaam are being burned to a crisp and reassembled to burn again and again (Titus) and sitting in hot semen (Balaam). Mary was an adulteress who showed her long hair in public. Her philandeirng of course explains the "virgin birth" ("honey I swear--it was the holy spirit!!"), her actual baby daddy was a Roman soldier named Pantera (I think he may also have been some kind of rock star) and Jesus was NOT crucified by the Romans but indeed stoned to death by his fellow Jews for heresy and sorcery, of which they are rightly proud. And I'm not even finished with chapter one!!