Collective Approval of Annoymouse Comments

I have a proposal for people who have been designated "hall monitors" and given access to the anonymous comment approval queue.
From now on, I'm not going to consider it necessary to publish every anonymous post that isn't flat-out objectionable. It's easy to become a registered member here and therefore people who want to be anonymous are not really owed anything. Instead, I'm going to think of the queue as an "audition." Does the post add something interesting (to me) to the conversation? I'll post it. (This covers a lot of comments.) Is it just more disruptive crap without any redeeming qualities at all? (This covers very few comments.) I'm zapping it into oblivion. Is it not interesting to me, but might be interesting to someone else among the hall monitors? (This is a fairly good chunk of comments.) THESE I will leave in the queue, in case another hall monitor comes along and finds them post-worthy. If that doesn't happen within 24 hours, I'll give them the heave-ho just to keep things tidy.
I'll also be attaching a note to anonymous posts I approve, just to indicate that I am the person who did the approving, and I think it would be helpful if other people did the same.
- Login to post comments

not a bad idea
n/t
ok
personally, I'm extremely liberal towards annoymices' opinions -- even stupid ones -- and I'll draw the line at extreme redundancy, i.e. "the haters! the haters!"
_________________________________
happiness is either here or nowhere
Yup...
That's pretty much what I meant by "no redeeming value." So do as you see fit :)