|
|
Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 36 guests online.
User loginNavigationFeatured Content WTCD Wiki WTCD Compendium WTCD Podcasts Glossary 9/11 TV News Archive 9/11 Unveiled by Enver Masud David Chandler's YouTube Channel Council for the National Interest Popular Mechanics: Money Masters Orwell Rolls in His Grave Reel Bad Arabs Recent blog posts
WTCD User Comments
|
The Controlled Demolition of 911Blogger? |
PollCan Maduro get a fair trial from Alvin Hellerstein? Of course, Judge Hellerstein is a jurist with integrity. 0% No, Judge Hellerstein works on behalf of the Zionist deep state. 0% Whether he does or not is irrelevant, Maduro is part of the op. 0% He will be bribed into pleading guilty to something minor. 100% Other (specify in comments.) 0% Total votes: 1
Disqus Comments |
Hey Reprehensor! I know you
Hey Reprehensor! I know you are monitoring this website. Truth is finally catching up to you eh? When the real 9-11 investigations happen I hope to see you on TV.
I'll be eating popcorn
nicely put, jdlc!
anyone else have that "storming the bastille" feeling? :)
911flogger
guilty as charged. the whipping of semites, arabs, and muslims has been deemed Reprehensible. The DHS (dept. of homeland security), by way of the Col., has sentenced you to digging for the truth in Goldmines - only this time, DeBeers ain't in charge.
thanks to everyone for the laughs today. do they still have two ad hominem comments over there for RepreCENSOR's libel suit?
If I were Rep
I'd ban Arabesque and Jenny just for carrying on like morons in that thread -- it really looks bad.
the David Cole on Donahue vids
That Stallion4 posted are interesting. These had been up for a whil (several months) posted by somebody different. The ones Stallion linked to which are the only ones on YouTube now were posted only a month ago, and by a persona named "Political Exile"who a) uses some white supremacist group logo as his avatar and b) links to something called "rodoh"instead of CODOH, which is Cole's and Smith's non-racist site. The rodoh site of course seems to be a racist site. Interesting that Stallion got those vids/links through the moderation queue at 911Blogger? Very interesting indeed!
And speaking of revisionism (and the "distrubed")
Distrubing patterns
I'd love to let this die and move on like the next person. But the more I think about it, the more I notice disturbing patterns.
Of course the very last thing you'd like to do is let this die -- a thread where you can rave hatefully is like a Christmas present for you.
For the record, regardless of how horrible some people where behaving I was willing to assume mental issues or what not, but this calling people racists because you don't agree with every niggling detail is beyond the pale. That is a deliberate lie--or as Arabesque said, provocation.
"Every niggling detail." I don't know if this reflects her own misunderstanding of the issues (probably) or deliberate spin.
Thing is, this is not the first time with some of the people involved. Last fall, in the middle of the Webster Tarpley/ no plane troll tag team, one of these people was sending me emails pretending to be concerned about "how I was doing" whilst at the same time emailing site administrators lying behind my back.
Yup, that was me and that was when I still *was* concerned -- and concerned about things she was doing online that I thought would ultimately be very destructive and possibly dangerous for a completely uninvolved third party who was a real person.
I've been very quiet about that until now. Why get in the way of some git discrediting themselves? But thinking back this isn't the first time something like this happened....
John Albanese made a film. It was a very good film. I'll be honest--it wasn't my best 911 film, but it was good. Still I preferred Press for Truth. But one individual kept pushing it to the fore, recommending it as the best 911 film they liked--right up until they started slagging the man based in part on invented(or at least impossible to confirm) charges of being the author of two or three anonymous posts. Then suddenly he was evil and, coincidently part of a noplanes troll hate campaign.
Whaaaa? This is again a reference to me and some difficult-to-follow revisionism (I don't think I ever liked Albanese's film *that* much, but I did like it a lot more before Albanese pulled his "Ajohnymous" stunt over at blogger and ADMITTED to being an anonymous, anti-controlled- demolition troll. He admitted it.)
Hmmm...
This thread shows the beginning of a similar dynamic with Jon Gold:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/4824
He also became the target of BOTH this group AND noplane trolls. I received an email claiming Jon has sending threats out of the blue-- I was to find out much later that email, as angry as it was, was the end of an email argument, NOT a spontaneous threat out of nowhere.
Ummm, extent of argument: "Casseia, disavow Real Truther immediately! I order you to do so!" -- "Jon, fuck off" -- "Casseia, have you burned any Jews lately?" So I guess it's alright to say things like that if you are very, very mad.
I would like to apologize to Jon Gold at this time. I was very harsh about that in public, and whilst I do think the sitch could have been handled better, I still helped perpetuate a mistaken view of Jon as a person who spontaneously sends nasty emails of of the blue. For that , I'm sorry.
No, he sends inexcusably manipulative and hateful emails to people who consider him a friend. That's worse.
Now fast forward to the Kennebunkport fiasco:
http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2123&highlight=kennebunkpor...
http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3550&highlight=kennebunkpor...
Those of us asking questions were first slandered by Tarpley, Barrett and co, then--you guessed it--the noplanes trolls. Predictable so far. But there was a twist--for some bizarre reason a couple of people who had nothing to do with challenging the Kennebunkport Warning were targeted in videos. Both these people are part of the WTCD crew. There is no reason to include them--THEY DID NOTHING, THEY SAID NOTHING--to challenge Tarpley. They were innocent of that--but not innocent. Hind sight being 20/20, the only reason they could possibly be included is to generate sympathy to distract from what they are --part of the noplanes troll tag team.
Yes, Petros and I were both included in the same series of videos. We hadn't challenged Tarpley but we had participated prominently in a local anti-war demo as Truthers -- in my case from the stage. Video was taken of us there by someone we still don't know and used in a series of nasty mind-fuck videos and threatening blogs. But doncha see, it was a ruse! A self-inflicted wound to give us cred. And, QED, we are part of "the noplanes troll tag team." We couldn't possible have been targets in our own right. WTF. This would be funny if it wasn't so sad.
An aside, but may be relevant:
In the last couple of months, I've had the strangest email spam pile up at an account I rarely use--spam with loads of noplanes trolls cc'd. Earlier this year, out of the blue, I also received an email from one of those cc'd, none other that Jennifer [we'll say "W" -- for a person who freaks out at even a mention of her first name, she's awfully casual about using the full names of others.] For those who don't know, Jennifer is a close friend of Killtown's, some suspect his girlfriend. She emailed me at my regular account trying to stir up some bollox as the "911stalker". I mistook her for Nico until someone set me straight.(also reported her to yahoo for harassment--hee, hee). But the point is according to these emails Jennifer is the source of many erroneous accusations--including some the WTCD crew are promoting. [I hope everyone got the memo regarding the "erroneous accusations" we must now promote.]
Mind, this is from a noplanes spam list so consider the source, but it would explain some "coincidences".
Back to the tag teams: be careful of the person(s) who is excessively flattering at the same time the noplanes trolls attack, and then turn on a dime for apparently no reason.
It's a pattern--a disturbing pattern.
______________________________________
Submitted by Col. Jenny Sparks on Sun, 07/20/2008 - 4:50pm.
Did you get that? Our cover is blown. The identity of our supreme controller has been revealed... and it is Jennifer W of Portland. Never mind that I have never met her.
I give enough credit to most readers of blogger who are following that thread to see this for what it is: the sad confabulations of a person who would really like attention from other truthers, but doesn't know how to get it in a constructive way.
jon gold's real good at what he does...
if that's being an narcissistic professional victim.
Where to begin on the comic book colonel, she's a sad busy-body at best and a shill trying to put the best spin on a situation that makes 911shiller look really bad at worst.
I've been a solidified 9/11 truther since 2002 and had never heard of those shills until I stumbled upon 911shiller by chance in 2006. Interestingly enough they seem to come tied at the hip with the no-planers.
That's some "psychological projection" for ya'.
they're so good because we (and others) are so bad!
yep, cass and bigD, it looks like the recent kerfuffle has given the Comic Book Colonel Jenny Gump a lot of new material to work with to build herself up. Like John Albanese and Jon Gold, Col Jenny seems to claim authority based on who her enemies are. This is the basic idea between the false dichotomy in the truth movement--"I am not a no-planer, in fact they hate me more than they hate anyone, so I must be legit, and when I say it was LIHOP and al Qaeda exists and explosive demolition is just speculation, you will believe me because to not do so would mean you don't support the families."
It's "family values" and "American flag lapel pins" all over again. This should notg come as a huge surprise since fake truthers are of the same ilk as fake journalists (cue Mr. Potatohead Tim Russert, another canonized "victim" with a family!) I know, how dare we yada yada.
At least (and here goes one of the erroneous accusations that "Jennifer W" told us to launch) the Comic Book Colonel has found a useful existence as the ostensible diversity for 911Blogger's actual uniformity. Someone so desperate to be liked and to be considered important but with no actual way to accomplish either feat is flattered into thinking she's "on the team" so long as she helps give the impression that Gold, Reprehensor, Albanese et al are not actually dishonest (because you see, she's honest, and she disagrees on some things with them but doesn't think they are dishonest. Ahh, psychology!)
uh oh, martell the fourteenth is playing pile on
i remember him going through a drive-thru to pick up a big mac, or something similar to help with the freshman fifteen, in one of his truthin' videos. i wonder where he went to lunch with kucinich. (L)IHOP, possibly?
gotta love all the canned comments over at the apt. me encanta!
jesus christ, im gone for a
jesus christ, im gone for a couple of days and i come back to Reprehensor yet again playing the censorship card that he plays so well. seriously Rep, you're fucking shameless. i would hope that you're on someones payroll considering on the audacity of your shilling and selective censorship. at least thats a reason for how you've acted over the years, a paycheck. but if you do this indefensible shit without any pay you're just plain pathetic. please consider dropping out of the "9/11 truth" movement before you do any more harm. you've done more than enough already.(seriously Rep, ive known about you since your old days at GNN and your game is up. its obvious what your purpose is. many of us are on to those like you and you specifically. keep it up hack. we take notes.)