Barry Jennings Interview, Uncut

casseia's picture

Please take the time to watch this interview with Barry Jennings, who was in WTC 7 during the collapse of the Twin Towers and, like William Rodriguez, states without hesitation that explosions came from beneath him. This interview deserves all the publicity it can get, because I think Mr. Jennings has really gone out on a limb with his candor. It's also worth downloading.



Thanks to 911veritas for putting it on YouTube and to the Loose Change guys for getting this on the record.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Annoymouse's picture

Family Guy is losing it.......

911B already had to delete one thread today because DHS and Jonny b Good were railing against the "church of CD" out of nowhere and then this:

Jon Gold-"If Controlled Demolition is the "best piece of evidence we have", and is the "smoking gun of 9/11," then WHY is it so EASY to use against us?"

DHS(professional hack, know it all)-"because it isn't the smoking gun that so many naive followers of false leaders claim, silly Jon Gold.

and you know this...... mannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn"

DHS-"I think it's time for all of us here who really want truth and accountability to stand up to what has become a cult following and say you are doing more harm than good."(in relation to talking about CD)

Jon Gold-"Sorry... but some of us are a bit fed up. I respect the work of Dr. Jones, and I respect the question of how those buildings came down, but I'm sick to death of it being used against us so easily while the majority of the movement continues to make it the #1 thing we should promote."

http://www.911blogger.com/node/16585#comment

just putting this out there for those who want to counter the bullshit over there(those who havent yet been banned by the heavy handed mods there)

gretavo's picture

you might say they are imploding under the weight of their BS

Their bluff is being called and they are whining instead of revealing their hand, which contains nothing but bad intentions. When they thought of themselves as big fish in a little pond they could get away with fooling a lot of people but now that the movement has grown to include thousands of active real truthers they are starting to stick out like sore thumbs with sticks stuck all over them. The mutual support they give each other is increasingly obvious as manufactured consensus and their serious character flaws just become more obvious. They would love to just take their ball and leave the playground but they know that if they do no one will follow them and no one will complain.

Chris's picture

i just find it hilarious

i just find it hilarious that even now despite that 911B has basically protected frauds like DHS and Jon from the "evil proponents of CD that are hurting the movement" by banning anyone who didnt take their type of bullshit still manage to rail against "us". you won Jon! Rep and the other tools at 911B are on your side! always were.  yes, 911B had to purge the site of all the real truthers, to steal a line.

casseia's picture

Yeah, I hardly even get mad any more

when I read their whiny shit -- it just seems so feeble. No posts of mine that address Jon are ever published anymore -- why do you suppose that is? I'm sure it couldn't be because he and his arguments are so fragile that they just can't withstand any kind of critique from me...

casseia's picture

BTW, Chris -- good to see you!

Does this mean you got some computer issues worked out?

Chris's picture

yeah, Rep is shameless in

yeah, Rep is shameless in his modding. that would be typical of him to allow Jons anti-CD rants but not even allow a rational response from you or others. i can sort of understand not wanting arguments to start but there is clearly a pattern over at 911B.........and yeah, my comp is currently working but that could change any minute,haha. plus im a moron when it comes to computers and usually end up accidentally fixing it through trial and error.(or finding out it was something extremely simple like my monitor being unplugged) this old comp aint dead yet! and its good to see you and RT still doing the damn thing right,haha.

gretavo's picture

yo chris

to echo cass, nice to see you!

Chris's picture

you too man, its been a long

you too man, its been a long time. good to see the site is still going strong. i wrote the annoymouse entries about 911B and Family Guy today just in case you didnt guess. (fyi, the site doesnt always let me post comments under my name. though its entirely possible that my shitty computer is the problem and not the site, im not sure.)

Annoymouse's picture

What kind of comp. problem

What kind of comp. problem is it? I know comps. pretty well but diagnosing over a forum isn't easy. My desktop Maxtor 300G decided to take a dive last week and I've spent a full week recovering what I could. Ugh. Computers are great when they work but when they crash it's almost as infuriating as having to listen to schills like Jon Gold w/o the forum to respond. ;)

-Whitey

dicktater's picture

Hey Whitey!

Did you try recovery with a Linux Live boot CD. I've had good luck using a Knoppix Live CD.

Sometime, you can put them in the frig or freezer and get a little longer read time out of them bfore they overheat.

Best deal on HD data recovery I ever used was a place in CA (forget the name at the moment). $500 on an 80GB Maxtor. But, check this out:

This isn't the best price that they have had on this drive but, it's still dang cheap and has a FIVE YEAR WARRANTY. They've had them in the past for as little as $99.99.

Buy two for a little over $250 and do a RAID-1 mirror set. One croaks, the other still lives and is accessible with all yer data without the bad drive hooked up. Get the warranty replacement drive and re-create your RAID set for redundancy.

Seagate 500GB Serial ATA/300 16MB Buffer ST3500641AS-RK - Retail Hard Drive Kit.
Seagate:
FRYS.com #: 4697788Serial ATA/300
7200RPM
16MB Buffer
5 Year Warranty
In stock, same day shipping
Price: $129.99
http://shop1.frys.com/{WN3jNUVC7VXWr1df6VGhVg**.node2}
/product/4697788;jsessionid=WN3jNUVC7VXWr1df6VGhVg**
.node2?site=sr:SEARCH:MAIN_RSLT_PG

I've bought quite a few Seagates from them during the past 4-5 years. Not one has ever gone south. I only lost an external case that was left on 24/7. The case overheated due to poor air circulation in that particular model ccase. Not really a good idea to leave externals on all the time anyway.

Annoymouse's picture

Yeh I used the Linux system

Yeh I used the Linux system recovery live boot CD. I have to say it is the single best piece of software I have ever used for handling a borked OS. I love the fact that it comes with Paragon's modules for reading/writing to NTFS systems. My prob with the drive was that the motor is going out or something along those lines. If I smack the side of the HD w/ the case off it'll boot up. lol! It's terrible but I've made it through losing minimal data.

Seagate's are hands down my favorite and most reliable drives. Western digital sucks and Maxtor isn't all that good either. I've had ~4 WD's die in the same manner (heads start physically damaging the disks). I've been trying to avoid buying any new HD's but I may break down and get one w/ prices being so cheap.

Thanks for the advice.

-Whitey

Tahooey's picture

i guess they pulled that thread

i don't see it listed among their blogs any more, was it something i said? j/k

juandelacruz's picture

nice find, thanks cass

nice find, thanks cass

petros's picture

Barry Jennings Interview


Thank you very much, Casseia, for posting this video.
And yes, I agree that it deserves all the publicity it can get, for many reasons.

Also, it's refreshing to see a return on this site to themes that are
closer to the World Trade Center Demolition instead of what seems to be
a more fascinating subject to some, that is a constant obsession with
the articles of faith, language and culture surrounding the Journal of Oregon Ornithology (JOO).
http://www.orednet.org/~rbayer/j/joomenu.htm

I'm very glad that Barry Jennings agreed to speak on video to people in
the Truth movement. Ok, let's call them documentary movie makers, if we
have to. Too bad that their voices in the background keep reminding the
viewer how shallow some people are - these are key players in the Truth
movement, whose work is supposed to help set our minds free - and how
clueless they can be about some of the simplest things. How many times
can you inject the word "excellent" in a video which is meant to reveal
to the world tragic, unbearable realities implicating individuals who
hold power and authority in the Highest Chambers for mass murder and
criminal cover-up of unprecedented proportions?

I'd say the interview "technique" was one of the worst I've seen in
years. The only other people who are constantly and unfailingly repeat
offenders of the same failings in interview techniques are police
officers and doctors. Which is an astounding fact, because the
interview is meant to be THE prime instrument that will get to elements
of the truth that doctors and police will use in order to save lives.
But daily life repeatedly proves them to be clueless about the simplest
interview skills: no emotional connection with the interviewee, no
ability to tune into the same reality, no ability to stay with the
person's flow, to interact positively and meaningfully neither
"leading" nor ignoring the essential messages. All these faults are
glaring in the interview with Barry Jennings. Mr. Jennings laid it out
on a plate for them, but our people were just so enthralled with
themselves, so hyped and self-conscious about interviewing someone who
can not name the agency that employs them that they disrupted,
interrupted continuity and constantly mismatched the emotional tone of
the conversation, shifting it from where Barry Jennings was at, to
where their own unresolved "stuff" is.

INTERVIEWER:
- What's your impression of Building 7? In your experience in working
there, what kind of vibe did you get from that building? You know there
was the CIA there and obviously there was the Department of Defence,
the Secret Service was there

The Other INTERVIEWER, interrupting:
- the IRS...

INTERVIEWER:
- yeah, IRS was there.

The "vibe"? "What kind of vibe did you get from that building?"

Here's another brilliant segment.

BARRY JENNINGS:
- I was there as part of one of my agencies which I can't name...

INTERVIEWER, interrupting:
- Of course!

BARRY JENNINGS, trying to regain train of thought:
- ...and , um, we would sit there and we would set reports, we would get updates as far as the emergency that was on hand...

Anyway, I'm grateful they did this work, but really, a little
introspection and self-reflection could go a long way. There's nothing
wrong with us having expectations from people whose interviewing skills
are being applied in a crucial sphere of life to apply them well or get
some help to do it right.

Getting back to Barry Jennings, I'd say that regardless of the fact
that he "can't name" the agency he works for, there's plenty of very
useful ~ explosive! ~ information in his story. The thing that needs to
be verified is, if indeed this person exists, if he did work assigned
to the Office of Emergency Management for real, and if he was there on
that morning. This is an essential part of the story, and the
information has to be either laid out in a way so that people can
verify it for themselves, or a trustworthy, credible source should be
provided who will vouch for the veracity of the information by saying
that "yes, it is true".

If I give you information that is potentially life changing or life
saving, and if I know that the only way the information can be put to
use is to make it verifiable, I will find, create, a way to make it
verifiable.

If you are on the receiving end of information that is potentially life
changing or life saving, and if you know that the only way the
information can be put to use is to make it verifiable, it's part of
your mission to find, create, a way to make it verifiable.

All the stuff I'm saying here is elementary to anyone who is involved
with either investigative journalism, documentary making, or social
struggles involving lies, cover-ups, and whistleblowing. Isn't it the
third (by now) version of this movie? Haven't these people been willing
to learn anything from all the feedback they've received all these
years? We NEED them to do quality work, and we NEED them to be
functional and dependable.

Back to Barry.
I'm willing to embrace anyone, no matter what unnamed agency they work
for, when it becomes clear that their motivation is the truth, the
community, social justice and the rule of law, both in the narrow sense
and also in the moral sense. Since we're not given any other
information about Barry Jennings, we are left to guess whether he is
actually motivated by those values or not. Since his job is plenty of
reason to mistrust him, then only these values would be reasons to
trust and embrace his contribution to the Truth movement. In my eyes he
seems sincere, his voice sounds authentic. I can't judge from a video,
but his persona projected a more genuine presence than those conducting
the interview.

But the thing is we shouldn't have to be judging the veracity of his
story by the timbre of his voice, his gender, the color of his skin or
ethnicity - what if he worked for the Journal of Oregon Ornithology
(JOO), would that make him less believable? There's the question again,
and it comes back to having to do quality work in our
investigations. Creating verifiable sources, creating materials that
people can believe or reject not according to their prejudices, but
according to the experiencible elements of Truth, rising.

Petros Evdokas
petros@cyprus-org.net
http://petros-evdokas.cyprus-org.net/Another-sort-of-Introduction.html
___________

casseia's picture

David Ray Griffin

has a good section on the Barry Jennings and Michael Hess testimony in 9/11 Contradictions starting on page 255. He mentions the agency that Jennings works for and notes that Jennings and Hess' testimonies corroborate each other.

Hess was interviewed on the morning of September 11 by a news reporter and said:

I was up in the emergency management center on the twenty-third floor, and when all the power went out in the building, another gentleman and I walked down to the eighth floor with smoke, thick smoke, all around us, for about an hour and half. But the New York Fire Department... just came and got us out.

Jennings was also interviewed on September 11, and subsequently by Penn State Public Broadcasting in 2002. His story is consistent -- the notable thing about this interview is the care with which the timeline and some other details are established, since both timeline and his location have been obscured and obfuscated by the media on several occasions, most recently in the BBC "Conspiracy Files" show.

The Loose Change guys (Dylan Avery, et al) have been rightfully criticized on many an occasion, but I think they did a reasonable job with this interview and they certainly did the right thing by making it public.

With regard to Jennings' super-sekrit employment, I think they are doing what they know how to do to minimize his harassment -- by Truthers among others. As I said, DRG mentions what agency it is.

petros's picture

Thanks, Casseia /Barry Jennings interview

Every single bit of what you wrote here under the title "David Ray
Griffin" is very useful as material that should accompany all of our
promotion of that video interview with Barry Jennings.

The text
should be directly attached or associated somehow with all future
promotions of the video so that they can be appreciated together by
visitors and researchers who  are into critical thinking.

It has certainly put most of my concerns aside!

Thanks again,

Petros

__________

 

gretavo's picture

Barry Jennings - A Honeypot Being Promoted by Fake Truthers?

I'm starting to think maybe. Check out the first of these videos. It is probably new to you since for years I remember seeing the first part of the Jennings "on the street interview" (in "9/11 Revisited" by Dustin Mugford)without seeing this second part. To begin with, Petros may be happy to find that we can switch from discussion of Zionists (who he like to call Joos) back to the more aceptable Moooozlimsss, since Jennings seems to say at the beginning "I prayed to Allah and thought that's it we're gone." Now, I thought it was odd that Jennings chose Alex Jones and Loose Change to tell his story, but now maybe that choice makes sense in the context of his being a plant himself. Of course, a lot of what he says is true, the problem is that he may keep the story "Loose" and "Change" it down the line. The second vid is the one most of us have seen, though it includes a part not shown in 9/11 Revisited, where he credits some dude next to him with hearing his and Mr. Hess's cries for help. He starts by introducing him as "this journalist" and then corrects himself to "this gentlemen". An innocent mistake of course, but that itself could have been thrown in to cause pointless conspiracy theorizing by truthers. I say this is all a set up and that Loose Change and Alex Jones are by now obviously controlled opposition.



casseia's picture

Nah, he's not saying "this journalist"

I think he was repairing his "dis" by replacing it with "this."

gretavo's picture

eh, could be...

i can still hear it both ways, oh well! I would like to think Jennings is legit but I have a nagging bad feeling, maybe because of the LC/AJ connection to the story...

gretavo's picture

oh, and Petros...

You never responded to this, so I'll repost here.

What's Kaminiski got to do with anything?

No one to my knowledge has ever quoted or cited Kaminski here. But since you posted this to imply that this site has "jew-hating" leanings, I think we should examine Kaminski's article and find out what exactly you find "jew-hating" about it. In fact, I'm going to start at the end, because I suspect that is where we will get to the crux of the matter. This from Kaminski:

Only today, all is permissable within the new streamlined, alluring and utterly soulless American media spectrum, except for one subject.

The Holocaust. The most untouchable of topics. We may not discuss it. In many countries — most of Europe, in fact — they'll throw you in jail and throw away the keys in a pile of trivialities, and you'll never see your home again. Just ask Ernst Zundel, or any of his other thought comrades jailed in Germany after being renditioned from elsewhere for simply reporting the unbiased, empirical facts of World War II.

The unbiased empirical facts are that the Germans didn’t gas anybody during World War II, that there was no “final solution” planned other than deportation to Palestine, and that the great shame of Jewish leaders forever throughout history — and why they were probably banned by God in the Bible — is that the worldwide Jewish organizations were complicit with Hitler in the herding of Jews and their deaths were largely caused by the Allied bombing of 1945, after which typhus and starvation raged. The founders of Israel wanted those people dead, because they didn’t want them in Israel. No valid evidence of gas chambers exists. Plenty of people died; war is like that. AP reported 875,000 Jews total in a 1947 report. And the religion of the Six Million marches on, demolishing whole societies in its ugly path.

And here’s another in the endless examples of why Jews don’t believe in freedom of speech.

As we speak, Professor Robert Faurisson of France faces years in jail for simply saying “show me evidence of gas chambers” on Iran’s Sahar TV (my favorite station, as a matter of fact). I have spoken of these matters on this same show nine times and said far worse than Faurisson. Maybe I should go to France, eh?

All we are actually are asking is for Jews to prove their hysterical interpretations of history are true, but they can’t do that, so they bribe people and make laws prohibiting discussion of the subject, because they know they will lose any neutrally judged debate.

This is the Jewish war on freedom of speech. You will believe this false, twisted history, or you will go to jail. If you want to forever erase any notion you may still entertain that Germans mass-gassed Jews, read Paul Grubach’s magnificent recap of the debate:

Ironically, it is, I believe, a very favorable sign for the future of Holocaust revisionism that most of the Western power elites refuse to debate the Holocaust revisionists, but only resort to name calling, threats of career destruction and jail sentences. It suggests to the world that Holocaust revisionism cannot be defeated with evidence and reason. The opponents of revisionism are intellectually impotent, and they cannot defeat revisionism with facts, evidence and logic. The "Holocaust" is a weak and flimsy ideology that needs special laws, threats of career destruction and jail sentences to protect it.

www.rense.com/general69/gasccm.htm

 

Now, given that this passage is embedded within what can best be called a screed by a less than talented individual, I am not about to endorse it wholesale, but I will use it as an example of the problem I have with your approach, Petros, which is so similar (exact actually) to the approach used by those who would hide the truth about 9/11 or anything else.

Unlike many, I have actually studied the issue of holocaust denial, and of the holocaust itself.  I have not, in the process, examined the work of a single racist or anti-semite (unless you use the circular definition that anyone who questions the holocaust is an anti-semite, which I reject.)  Included in the researchers and historians whose work I have read are David Cole, a Jewish revisionist whose life was threatened by the JDL after which he "recanted", Germar Rudolf, a German scientist jailed for his work on the forensic evidence (or lack thereof) for homicidal gassings, and Roger Garaudy, a French Marxist who spent time in a Nazi camp himself.

I have come to the firmly held conclusion that the essence of Kaminski's passage cited above is correct.  The so-called final solution was not a plan of extermination but of deportation, that Zionists co-operated with the plan in a brutally cynical manner, and that the reason for inventing the crime was so that Germany could be accused and held accountable for war crimes that were not also committed by the allies.  The myth was also created in order to galvanize support for the illegal and anti-Semitic state of Israel and has been used since to support not just Zionism in the form Israel but also to manipulate anyone identifying as Jewish, whether they be Zionists or not, and/or religious or not.

Such a perversion and falsification of history is not unique to Jeiwsh people, nor was it perpetrated by Jewish people exclusively.  Secular myths are as common as supernatural myths and serve the same purpose--to manipulate people into behavior that is not necessarily rational but that is beneficial to the powerful--those who would control others by any means necessary.

This is the kind of nuance that your position precludes, if we are to judge by your blanket condemnation of what you call anti-semitism and jew-hatred.  By citing Kaminski as an example of the kind of thing you think people here are OK with you are not only being intellectually sloppy, if not dishonest, you are dodging real debate.

I ask you therefore to tell us whether you believe that all who "deny the holocaust" are racists and/or "jew-haters".  If your answer is yes, you should realize that you will be accusing me of racism and/or jew-hatred and that I will indeed take it personally and be offended.  If you think instead that there are people (i.e. me) who without being racist or jew-haters have misinterpreted or misunderstood the subject of the holocaust, I would appreciate your showing why you think so based on your own analysis of the arguments made by people like Garaudy, Rudolf, and Cole--not by people like Kaminsky, David Duke, or any other straw men.

gReT

Big_D's picture

Hello, Petros, I second the request for clarification.

You've leveled some pretty serious charges of thought crime against the "editors" & patrons here. I can, somewhat, understand if you've not done the research or not wanting to "go there" out of fear of reprisal. What I don't appreciate, and what doesn't spek well of your intentions, is insinuations that those of us who do point out the ugly truth do so for any other reason than we're tired of being lied to.

gretavo's picture

thanks BigD

it's nice to know that someone else sees the problem with accusing people here of things without being able to back it up. It's one thing for people to disagree with us or point out where we are wrong about things (the recent discussion about the nature of ashkenazi for example) That is part of a vibrant debate and helps us improve our understanding. It is something totally different to resort to insinuations in order to evade an issue, which I am beginning to suspect is the case here.

Lazlo Toth's picture

The Big Picture and Where Do You Work?

Barry Jennings is now suspect because he doesn’t wish to
name the agency or company that employs him? I do not discount the use of planted actors in an intelligence op, but “Harley Guy” would be the perfect example of that, not necessarily someone who talks of explosions in a building in which we know explosions took place later in the day on a large scale. Where is this big “Everybody has to reveal their real name and tell strange videographers where they work” to be accepted as truthful, coming from all of a sudden? I appreciate your skeptical arguments, Petros, and you have made a lot of good points, but—how can I put this simply?—behind this façade, this thin wooden, Hollywood film set of “Freedom and Democracy,” which all the sheeple dearly want to think is Reality, lurks the control of an international mob of greedy psychopaths who have professional hit-men at their beck and call. Basically, a 9/11 whistleblower-witness is fucking badly with their gameplan, and they don’t like that because they don’t want to go to prison. If you are dying and crawling and begging in the street to have the Controllers give you a piece of bread while they watch their sick little show play out, enjoying the pure evil of their control over all the carnage and the cries for mercy, it is pure, power-game entertainment for them. They love this shit because they are soulless psychos who only feel alive when they see the slave’s kiss upon the earth beneath their feet.

Not that you would ever hear this on CNN, but it seems that our countries are now in the hands of a “mafia” which makes the Italian Cosa Nostra look like a small-time, neighborhood gang. Maybe, as Casseia pointed out, Barry just doesn’t feel like getting hasseled or “suicided,” and besides, whether Barry Jennings is real, or is someone playing a part in an intelligence play, doesn’t really mean much within the Big Picture anyways, because at the end of the detailed investigative day, somebody still blew them damn buildings up (Barry or no Barry), and it coincidentally appears that the owner of the buildings walked away with a Shiite load of free cash after buying into the WTC property just a few months earlier with someone else’s money. The owner of those buildings also, coincidentally, happens to be buddy-buddy with, not only the world’s largest Media mogul, but the leaders of the little country that has most benefited from this current “War on Terror,” which, of course, was the natural outcome of, or response to, the 9/11 attacks. It is not mere coincidence that all the major pieces and players of the 9/11 operation happen to point ultimately back to Israel. We are not coincidence theorists. We are conspiracy theorists. There is a large, well-connected and significant conspiracy going on here, and it has been going on for quite some time now. Note also the significant difference between a hypothesis and a theory. We are theorists because we have a very real and significant case. If various groups of accumulated details or floating hypotheses turn out to be planted info, or just wrong, the operational framework, which we do understand, still stands and gets stronger by the day. At this point, we’re just curious about details within the framework, AND BTW, most avionics experts and pro pilots (without a gun pointed at their family) would pretty much agree that those planes on 9/11 were being remotely commandeered from somebody on the ground, and in the case of the New York leg of the attacks, aided, most likely, by two separate homing or guidance signal devices planted inside the towers at the points (or floors) of entry (SEE: Marsh & McLennan, L. Paul Bremer, Jeffrey Greenberg, Maurice Greenberg). Anyone who still believes in Muslim hijackers at this point, should be sure to call me about my upcoming online auction of the renowned Manhattan Bridge – yours for a starting, and affordable, bid of only $10,000! We Do Accept the cash thru the PayPal. So this basically leaves us with an operation using controlled demolition on large structures coupled with the usage of large planes being controlled remotely from unknown locations using communication devices which were pre-installed on commercial or used military planes by somebody with airport access. Find out who handled American, United and general airport security for the three 9/11 airports, and you’ve got a prime suspect for remote avionics systems installation. Unfortunately that evidence is now sealed and forbidden by Zionist judge Alvin Hellerstein, and any further investigation into the Lucky Larry insurance winnings is also forbidden by the judge of those cases and the current U.S. Attorney General, and devout Zionist, Michael Mukasey. All hassle-free entries and exits from the country, such as the 200 Israeli operatives released after 9/11, and given free passage back to Israel, are handled by another devout Zionist agent Michael Chertoff, who also runs the American Gestapo with its various mercenary military and intelligence auxiliaries. So when someone says that what we are looking at is a Zionist-Occupied Government, or a ZOG, they are not being anti-Semitic, they are simply stating a historical fact, but we have been trained and conditioned to not consider such things, to “not go there.”

And Petros, on the Barry Jennings not wanting to “get hasseled” thing, have you read Dicktater’s latest posting here of Wayne Madsen’s “The Russian-Israeli Mafia: Off-limits to FBI, US intelligence”? (And thanks to the D-man for the post! I’m still recovering from all the connecting stories of all our favorite characters.) Have you seen the 3.5 hour video “The Money Masters” and noticed the multiple U.S. presidents that have been assassinated when they decide to save their country and take on the Central Banking System and Rothschild family? – Republican Abraham Lincoln in 1865; Republican James Abram Garfield in 1881; Republican William McKinley in 1901; and Democrat John Fitzgerald Kennedy in 1963. The quotations in this film alone are amazing.

http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-515319560256183936&q=The+Money+M...

As far as the interview by Dylan Avery using the phrase “vibe of the building,” he is 25, and it’s not his fault, it’s my generation’s fault with all of our psychedelic experiments and journeys to the East ;D And anyways, as of late, I haven’t heard anything necessarily eloquent coming from the so-called professional TV news media either. It’s basically fake news delivered by biological news-reader personalities to an exhausted, drugged up, fluoridated public. And when I was in Washington one time, I did notice that the town had a very heavy “vibe,” like the airwaves were full of heavy happenings.

In the context of a single false-flag operation, the machinations of which are pretty well understood at this point, arguing about the minutia of a single witness interview will cause the viewers eyes to loose track of the big, obvious picture, the proverbial Giant Elephant in the room. Similarly, there are people in the 9/11 truth movement who say we should only focus on 9/11, but these folks could also be plants inserted to prevent the people who now have a general grasp on 9/11 from stepping back and looking at the larger context this single one-day operation actually fits into. If a person can’t see the natural relationship between understanding the history of Zionism and the creation of the State of Israel to understanding 9/11, it is because they do not know the history, which is also by design as well, but once a person can access ALL the highly pertinent evidence connected to a crime or a historical narration, the true picture of a situation has a great chance of emerging in a self-evident fashion. It is like this with the Holocaust narrative, as well as with 9/11 and the War of Terror. If Holocaust research has to have its boundaries set by legislation and protected by threat of criminal prosecution, then that means the historicity of the event has no real legs to stand on unless it is propped up and protected by legislation passed by cabals of bribed and compromised politicians.

This website doesn’t talk about the JOOS because we have hatred or dislike for the JOOS as a group, or a thing, or whatever you want to call it (to paraphrase John Lennon). The history of the 20th century intersecting with that of the State of Israel and the history and ideology of modern Zionism are important topics of discussion and consideration here because if you want to understand 9/11, you need to pay attention to these things. In TRUTH, and sorry to have to say this, but 9/11 was a major Zionist false-flag operation against America, one in a long treacherous series of such operations (the element of historical precedence) reaching back to 1954’s Operation Susannah in Egypt. Even Phillip Zelikow said that the invasion of Iraq was for the benefit of Israel. So if you want to understand what 9/11 really is and the modern reality we are about to enter into without turning into a complete JOO-hater, you need to know some Jewish history and religion, and then you need to understand how the modern Zionist ideologues manipulated that Jewish history and religion to control the psychology and historical perceptions of not only the Jewish masses, but the Christian powers of early 20th century Europe as well. Then you need to know about the various ideologies of hard-core right-wing militant Zionism and the history of underground terrorist groups like IZL and LeHI. You also need to understand how the Central Banking System works, the history of WWI, WWII, and how the Holocaust myth was created, developed, and why. Even the JFK assassination is related to the 9/11 operation as part of a large ongoing plan. Guess why Noam Chumpsky doesn’t want to talk about the JFK hit or 9/11? Read the now declassified correspondence between JFK and David Ben-Gurion. Ben-Gurion considered JFK “an enemy of Israel.” And what is it all about? Well, part of this plan is that Palestine, with its Mediterranean access, was seen as the future key control point of the oil-rich Middle East from which to launch a new global empire, or a kingdom, so to speak. Herzl thought that idea should be kept sort of low-key. He who controls the gold and the sources of energy, controls the world. Long story short, this is why we talk about all these things on this blog, because they are all indeed connected to the story in which 9/11 is a single element in a larger, even more complicated, yet not incomprehensible, picture. Yes, we are in totally deep shit, but it is a temporary condition. All things must pass.

gretavo's picture

good point alert!

"So if you want to understand what 9/11 really is and the modern reality we are about to enter into without turning into a complete JOO-hater, you need to know some Jewish history and religion, and then you need to understand how the modern Zionist ideologues manipulated that Jewish history and religion to control the psychology and historical perceptions of not only the Jewish masses, but the Christian powers of early 20th century Europe as well."

As all good points, it bears repitition. Studying the real history of the world is very much like lifting a rock. When you're not expecting to find creepy crawlies, you are naturally repelled, frightened, and even angered by the revelation. Once you lift the rock, moreover, a bunch of people who never talked to you suddenly have a great interest in giving you "the scoop" on what you're looking at. These are the second line of defense afetr the rock itself. They will claim to be giving you the low down on all the nasty stuff that still looks just like a bunch of disgusting vermin. And most folks will latch on to one of these guides and let them define for them this new disturbing vista. They are told which creepy crawlies are good and which are bad--which they should stomp on and which they should feed. The last thing the controllers want is for any of us to actually understand the underlying ecology of the under the rock world. What at first seems frightening and alien starts to lose its sting after a time of careful study. Once we have established our independence from those who would manipulate us we may not be right 100% of the time, but we start inching inevitably towards the truth. The closer we get, the more shrill and insistent the controllers get with their threats and admonishments.

What are they so afraid of? Losing control. They will lose control not through armed rebellion but through a gradual process of enlightenment whereby the masses they have been duping for so long will break free from the controlled reality they were stuck in (without knowing it) and tap into the reality they share with their liberated and newly compassionate fellow beings.

Armed with newly calibrated bullshit detectors we will not be led back into our pens by any of the old tactics of division, deception, and distraction. We who choose freedom are not looking for anyone's approval, validation, or praise. We are not afraid of the truth, no matter how disturbing it may seem at first glance. We, like many before us, have sworn eternal resistance to any and all tyrannies of the mind, and we will never be silenced.

Above all we reject fear and its evil twin hatred. This new awakening of consciousness may not seem like much at this point in history, but those of us who understand it have no doubt that it will soon bury the old order, whether or not it is repackaged as a "new world order". Resistance to it will only make it grow stronger. We have the keys back, it's time to drive home.

kate of the kiosk's picture

we are conspiracy theorists! we are! we are!

that's the first time i've heard that admission, and in such an ingenuous light! thanks Laz for staying the course!