Incredibly Important Information About Mossadmed Atta!

My infidel ex-girlfriend with whom I had a torrid affair before my martyrdom appears in the video. Is she not a real beauty? Unfortunately she doesn't return my calls anymore...

Cashier: "Dude you were right, that one [Loose Change Final Cut] wasn't nearly as good [as 9/11 Mysteries.] I fell asleep."

See, the other day cashier guy told me one of "my friends" (i.e. some totally random other 9/11 guy that I don't know) gave him a couple of DVDs, Loose Changout Final Crap and Zeitgeist and told me had had already watched 9/11 something or other (Mysteries? Yeah that's it) and that he was blown away. I told him those other two weren't actually as good. So yeah, way to make a simple story complicated, but the point is that Patsystan BS is not just irrelevant but it is also boring. I'll let you all know what he thinks of Zeitgeist, which random foreign dude at Starbucks asked me tonight if my sign was related to... How the hell did Zeitgeist become so popular? Is there really such an undercurrent of anti-christianism in the world today??

Why so much oblique irony? I watched the whole thing and found it fascinating.

The information in it was very helpful and it helped me see a lot more clearly which sections
of covert government and "non-government" agents (representing private
interests) were responsible for some of the black operations of
September 11. Especially in the crucial operations of distraction and
"patsification" - the creation of an artificial presence of the
non-existent entity called Al Qaeda.

There's comfort and clarity in seeing the connections between some the
events of 9/11 and creepy creepozoid criminals we know from previous
black ops in the service of the US and global ruling class. Many of us
who have been openly resisting the work of these spooks and agents of
blood, chaos and Imperium know their style, their "signature" methods;
the presentation by Daniel Hopsicker goes over some very familiar
territory, illuminating some of its details very well.

I think it would be more dignified and more responsible to articulate -
in direct words, not sideways  - what exactly is wrong with that
video, or what is objectionable with the material it presents, or with
the presenter. Disagreements are useful, but they need to be stated in
good faith and in a way so that discussion can benefit everyone to
reach a fuller view of reality.

For me, seeing a little more clearly now the long line of crimes and
criminals from the day and age of Barry Seal and his associate
"Hackenabush", the same familiar operations and methods of operation since
the Iran Contragate and Ronald Reagan's and George Bush Sr's October
Surprise (along with the BCCI scandal), plus the US State-sponsored
cocaine and heroin transportation distribution and marketing business,
it's all a relief to tell you the truth.

Some of those "dirty business" networks became stategically significant
and institutionalized - built into the system - in the modern global
Empire since all the way back from the Vietnam war. Modern Imperial
Capitalism has become inextricably woven with those forms of business,
just as in its previous mode, when Colonial Capitalism had reached its
historical peak it became inextricably woven with the opium business,
even going to the extent of creating an Opium War just to keep a
country enslaved to drugs.

When Empire reaches a peak in any given mode,  a conflation occurs
between all of its legal and illegal extensions, all of its public and
secret powers, all of its overt and covert operations making it
impossible for us to correct or heal any of it piecemeal. The entire
thing has got to go. The Truth movement is one of the only sections of
the global liberation movement that currently has the capability to
catalyze that process.

If we do it right.

Petros Evdokas
petros@cyprus-org.net
http://petros-evdokas.cyprus-org.net/Another-sort-of-Introduction.html
___________

I'm with Gretavo. I've followed Hopsicker and Hicks for years. Whether it's the "Amanda Keller / Atta cut up my kittens" story or Sander Hicks fabulous "tale of th crazy paranoid xenophobe who saw weird names on brown boxes" story...these guys specifically have both done three things that alarm me....

1. spoken against 'controlled demolition' on more then one occasion
2. have encourage others to go on time wasting crusades to study the patsies and their cover-stories totally out of context.
3. supported the official conspiracy theory of 9/11/2001 attacks

So, it wouldn't be so bad if the obvious controlled demolition of the towers were included in Hopsicker / Hick's research but it's not. They not only don't talk about the demolition...they have encouraged people to steer clear of the demolition of the world trade center complex on various occasions.

Sander Hicks picked the 5th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks to encourage others to shy away from controlled demolition...to look at things like his fabulous tale of Dr. Graham. I've read it. It's a garbage goose chase just like his first goose chase that brought him onto the 9/11 Truth scene. Look of Delmart Vreeland and Hick's first goose-chase. Jeez...I've wasted so much time!

And...it's not like I don't see the value in studying the patsies, pawns, and cover-stories. Studying this stuff will get us closer to the truth I'm sure. But shouldn't we cover these things in the correct context? Let's study them for what they most likely are, cover-up stories and patsies not international terrorists who managed to destroy 3 towers by hijacking planes.