Dennis Kucinich Comes Out 100% For LIHOP!!

believe it anymore. are you sure you're on the right site? are you sure you're a LIHOPopotamus and not a LIHOPoJACKASS?

Well, you make fun of it, but here it is, in that same document you
quoted. The Articles of Impeachment that were set forth as official
procedural documents in the US House of Representatives show that the
9/11 Truth movement has generated enough clarity and support among the
population and some politicians, by now, that many of our claims have
wound up within the argumentation, accusations and proofs provided by
Kucinich.

Please read for yourselves, below.
Petros

_________

"Article XXXIV

OBSTRUCTION OF INVESTIGATION INTO THE ATTACKS OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2001

From
http://chun.afterdowningstreet.org/amomentoftruth.pdf

"In his conduct while President of the United States, George W.
Bush, in violation of his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the
office of President of the United States and, to the best of his
ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United
States, and in violation of his constitutional duty under Article II,
Section 3 of the Constitution "to take care that the laws be faithfully
executed", has both personally and acting through his agents and
subordinates, together with the Vice President, obstructed
investigations into the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon
on September 11, 2001.

Following September 11, 2001, President Bush and Vice President Cheney
took strong steps to thwart any and all proposals that the
circumstances of the attack be addressed. Then-Secretary of State Colin
Powell was forced to renege on his public promise on September 23 that
a "White Paper" would be issued to explain the circumstances. Less than
two weeks after that promise, Powell apologized for his "unfortunate
choice of words," and explained that Americans would have to rely on
"information coming out in the press and in other ways."

On Sept. 26, 2001, President Bush drove to Central Intelligence Agency
(CIA) headquarters in Langley, Virginia, stood with Director of Central
Intelligence George Tenet and said: "My report to the nation is, we've
got the best intelligence we can possibly have thanks to the men and
women of the C.I.A." George Tenet subsequently and falsely claimed not
to have visited the president personally between the start of Bush's
long Crawford vacation and September 11, 2001.

Testifying before the 9/11 Commission on April 14, 2004, Tenet answered
a question from Commission member Timothy Roemer by referring to the
president's vacation (July 29-August 30) in Crawford and insisting that
he did not see the president at all in August 2001. "You never talked
with him?" Roemer asked. "No," Tenet replied, explaining that for much
of August he too was "on leave." An Agency spokesman called reporters
that same evening to say Tenet had misspoken, and that Tenet had
briefed Bush on August 17 and 31. The spokesman explained that the
second briefing took place after the president had returned to
Washington, and played down the first one, in Crawford, as uneventful.

In his book, At the Center of the Storm, (2007) Tenet, refers to what
is almost certainly his August 17 visit to Crawford as a follow-up to
the "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in the US" article in the
CIAprepared President's Daily Brief of August 6. That briefing was
immortalized in a Time Magazine photo capturing Harriet Myers holding
the PDB open for the president, as two CIA officers sit by. It is the
same briefing to which the president reportedly reacted by telling the
CIA briefer, "All right, you've covered your ass now." (Ron Suskind,
The One-Percent Doctrine, p. 2, 2006). In At the Center of the Storm,
Tenet writes: "A few weeks after the August 6 PDB was delivered, I
followed it to Crawford to make sure that the president stayed current
on events."

A White House press release suggests Tenet was also there a week later,
on August 24. According to the August 25, 2001, release, President
Bush, addressing a group of visitors to Crawford on August 25, told
them: "George Tenet and I, yesterday, we piled in the new nominees for
the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, the Vice Chairman and their wives and
went right up the canyon."

In early February, 2002, Vice President Dick Cheney warned then-Senate
Majority Leader Tom Daschle that if Congress went ahead with an
investigation, administration officials might not show up to testify.
As pressure grew for an investigation, the president and vice president
agreed to the establishment of a congressional joint committee to
conduct a "Joint Inquiry." Eleanor Hill, Executive Director of the
Inquiry, opened the Joint Inquiry's final public hearing in
mid-September 2002 with the following disclaimer: "I need to report
that, according to the White House and the Director of Central
Intelligence, the president's knowledge of intelligence information
relevant to this inquiry remains classified, even when the substance of
the intelligence information has been declassified."

The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks, also known as the 9/11
Commission, was created on November 27, 2002, following the passage of
congressional legislation signed into law by President Bush. The
President was asked to testify before the Commission. He refused to
testify except for one hour in private with only two Commission
members, with no oath administered, with no recording or note taking,
and with the Vice President at his side. Commission Co-Chair Lee
Hamilton has written that he believes the commission was set up to
fail, was underfunded, was rushed, and did not receive proper
cooperation and access to information.

A December 2007 review of classified documents by former members of the
Commission found that the commission had made repeated and detailed
requests to the CIA in 2003 and 2004 for documents and other
information about the interrogation of operatives of Al Qaeda, and had
been told falsely by a top C.I.A. official that the agency had
"produced or made available for review" everything that had been
requested.

In all of these actions and decisions, President George W. Bush has
acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President, and subversive of
constitutional government, to the prejudice of the cause of law and
justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.
Wherefore, President George W. Bush, by such conduct, is guilty of an
impeachable offense warranting removal from office. "