WTCD Blog Traffic Off From Early 2008 But Holding Steady
Hey everyone, just thought I'd report to y'all that we had about 1600 unique visits in April and again in May, down from a high of about 2400 in January. If this number seems small, remember that WTCD is not linked to by any major truth site, and never mentioned on any truth radio shows, etc. We have what I like to think of as an exclusive readership--a truthing elite that considers it better to be honest and right than to be popular with the rabble.
Rather than direct their friends and enemies here (since we don't sell ads we get nothing from lots of traffic except congestion!) I would encourage all readers to help those around them in the real world understand the truth about 9/11, and to do it in whatever way they think best. The efforts of 1000 people working independently and in a decentralized manner can accomplish more in the long term than many would imagine possible. By having faith in each other we need not be anyone's boss, nor be bossed by anyone--and we can still accomplish our goal to make the world a better place for all, I guarantee it.
- gretavo's blog
- Login to post comments
kewl, & some OT
[RealTM Annoymouse®]©®TM had one or two comments to make the past couple weeks, but I was prevented because the comments being locked down, which I notice they still are, except for in this blog entry. The ability to comment unregistered draws in extra noobs, as they can easily join the dialog, and are apt to return to read replies. Administrative headache though I imagine, so, your call.
I wanted to toss this holyhoax angle into the stew. Deals with engineered memeplexes, Thomas Kuhn's paradigm shift model, and the extraordinary artificial suppression of anomalies in the holyhoax memeplex by the state.
If you're familiar with Thomas Kuhn's "paradigm shift" model in his book "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions", you know that "persistent anomalies in existing paradigms of belief" are what eventually cause dominant paradigms to topple ("persistent anomalies" > "crisis" > "extraordinary science" > "new paradigm"). So if we accept that the "official holocaust narrative/all Jews as special, perpetual victims in need of special protective laws" perspective is the dominant paradigm, as surely as most of us reading have been marinated in that paradigm all our lives through school, MSM, TV/cinema, holocaust museums, etc... it would appear plausible that the powerful have taken the extraordinary measure of CRIMINALIZING the dissemination of persistent anomalies to that dominant paradigm, with the plausible motive of stunting the otherwise inevitable shifting of that particular paradigm. Why is that? The Truth ought to be able to stand up to open & ongoing scrutiny over time, no?
I know I'm preaching to the choir in that most readers here are, to varying degrees, filthy & disgusting [HolocaustTM Deniers®]©®TM but I reeled momentarily when I applied Kuhn's paradigm shift model to the heavy-handed approach by the state to maintaining their dominant holyhoax paradigm, by artificially/forcefully suppressing the emergence and dissemination of "stubborn anomalies". In so doing, TPTB/state exhibit what they call a guilty demeanor.
oops
"but I was prevented because the comments being locked down, which I notice they still are"
My boo boo. It was before that you could see "Add New Comment" on the blog homepage, and that stopped being visible, and I assumed comments were locked down. But when you open a blog entry, the "comment" button is there, and the unregistered can still comment/reply.
On the Kuhn paradigm shift model above, he gives an interesting mental framework for viewing the temporary/fleeting nature of "reality" in sciences, hard and social sciences both. It's of value to students & practitioners of a given science to be familiar with, to keep them from becoming complacent in their assumptions. But it's not really "actionable" per se, so it's all but irrelevant to Truth activists. A holyhoax skeptic can shout from the mountaintop "they're artificially suppressing anomalies in their dominant holyhoax paradigm!", but they'll simply lose most of their audience. Kuhn's book is a classic in the philosophy of science, but only a tiny fraction of 1% of people are familiar with the model (read the amazon reviews to acquaint yourself, or wiki's entry on the book); and those few who are familiar and understand what you're saying, are no better equipped to topple the paradigm (and thus the smokescreen protecting the criminal cabal which rules the West) than they were before. So it's just some group-brain fertilizer I tossed out there to see if anything unexpected grew... you never know.
could that be
because of the hiccupping and errors?
when did those problems first surface?