BBC Anchor Who Reported on WTC7 Collapse Early Agrees There May Be a 'Conspiracy'

dicktater's picture

Typical of a prisonplanet.com article, there are many embedded links. With the exception of the youtube video, they are not included in this post.

BBC Anchor Who Reported on WTC7 Collapse Early Agrees There May Be a 'Conspiracy'

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2008/250408_b_anchor.htm

We Are Change UK Question former BBC Report Phil Hayton-- who is 'amazed' that such a 'significant' event has no official explanation

Aaron Dykes
Prison Planet
Friday, April 25, 2008

Members of We Are Change UK questioned ex-BBC reporter Phil Hayton about the early reporting of WTC 7's collapse during a speaking appearance.

Hayton failed to recollect even being in the studio on the day of 9/11-- at first-- but then recalls the situation when it is described in detail, including the actions of Jane Standley, who reported the collapse some 26 minutes in advance with WTC Building 7 still visible in the background.

"A lot of eyebrows were raised," We Are Change reporters point out in summary, because many saw it as a clear controlled demolition, including a number of engineers.

Hayton responded, pointing out that he was not aware of the situation with WTC 7. "This sounds so significant-- I'm just amazed I didn't know about this... This is completely news to me."

"So, is there no official explanation?" Hayton further probed.

We Are Change continues to explain the delayed NIST report on WTC 7 as well as the response from a BBC editor who claimed 9/11 tapes were "lost" in a 'cock-up.'

"I sense that you think there's a conspiracy here-- but you might be right," Hayton concluded.

[jump for more]


On a previous occasion, We Are Change UK reporters contacted Jane Standley by phone about the telling incident. Standley, unlike Hayton, was not surprised by the revelation, but became uncomfortable and hurriedly ended the conversation, only commenting that she had been "harassed" about the situation already.

Surely, it is clear that neither Standley nor Hayton were 'in on a conspiracy'-- rather they were used and fed information. However, Hayton seems willing to admit it while Standley has thus far been unable to answer for the suspicious incident ahead of the unexplained collapse.

The suspicion surrounding early media reporting of WTC7's collapse-- which Aaron Brown of CNN also announced-- only exacerbates the demolition apparent that many police, fire fighters and other emergency workers were told about in advance and which many other news anchors described as being like a 'deliberately destroyed' building.

Further, WTC lease holder Larry Silverstein said that the building was "pulled" and rescue worker Kevin McPadden has reported hearing a countdown to Building 7's demolition.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
dicktater's picture

After watching the video...

WAC-UK did a great fucking job on this interview and video. Too bad that they didn't have a portable DVD player to show Hayton the Hayton-Standley reporting on 9/11. I would have loved it if WAC-UK had broken out the video that they used in the making of theirs after Hayton pulled miserable his Sargent Schultz.

I find it absolutely unfuckingbelievable that Hayton couldn't remember exactly where he was when he heard the news about WTC on 9/11. I'll never forget where I was. His stumbling around the question of his his where abouts is curious, indeed.

Will Hayton continue a dialog with WAC-UK after receiving more information on the collapse of WTC7? Or, will the top brass at the BBC tell Hayton to shut the fuck up? Or, will they just kill him, too? I hope not. But, It will be interesting to see nonetheless.

Annoymouse's picture

Here's a quick question for

Here's a quick question for everyone. I noticed this before in the video with Jane Standley. When she moves out of the way of building 7 there is a rapid puff of smoke that appears at the top of #7. It seems to me that someone could determine the velocity of the puff of smoke. Maybe it's from an explosion because the building was about to blow.

-Whitey

(Not that it matters with the rest of the overwhelming evidence of what went down.)