Why Hitler Came to Power in Germany

It has been suggested with some good evidence, that WW I was instigated by the aristocratic British establishment in order to destroy Germany as an economic power,or basically just to kill off the competition.
Germany was looked upon by the Brits in the same way as the Americans look upon China nowadays, a rising economic power wich threatened their own number one status in the world.
Britain was suffering from a imperial over-stretch.
The colonies cost more to retain than they brought back economically to the British homeland.
Germany had very few colonies.
And in order to win over the rural population of the Catholic south and the industrial proletariat of the Protestant north for the unification of all the German territories under the Prussian king,in so fighting back the opposition of the Church and the Social-Democrats, Bismarck created better conditions for the German lower classes with health-, unemployment- and pension-insurences and also with laws to improve working conditions and limiting working times. At the same time the British working class was still treated like crap by their arrogant industrialists.
The better treatment of workers and peasants increased the loyalty of the German lower classes towards the state and consequently increased the production output of the German industry as well.
This is most likely the reason why Germany was surpassing Britain as an industrial power. And the British establishment, especially a man called Cecil Rhodes and bunch of other "Manifest destiny" elitists didn´t like it.
So they planed and instigated a war to retain what today would be called "full-spectrum dominance" of the British Empire. (A false flag assassination plot of the Austrian crown prince by a Serb, a British intelligence asset in 1914).
But ally Russia had it´s internal problems with several revolutions and so in 1916 Britain, who was left with it´s only potent ally France, was on the verge of loosing the war.
And that´s when Lord Lionel Rothschild stepped in.
He and his banking empire had by that time become the primary financier of Zionism.
So he offered to get the Americans into the war using his financial agents close to the American government if the Brits promised him Palestine.
Or some say it was the other way around he was asked for help by the Brits first and they offered him Palestine as an incentive.
Whatever the sequence of events, the outcome was the Germans lost the war.
And according to Benjamin Freedman, an American-Jewish diplomat who was there, most everybody who showed up at Versailles for the Treaty on the allied side was Jewish.
Now even, if Rothschild had quite a bit of economic influence on the British, French and American governments,
to arrogantly show this kind of perceived Jewish power in such a blatant way to the defeated Germans, right when they were being slapped down with a treaty that was going to destroy their whole economy without even a slightest bit of doubt,
this would have been just plain crazy.
- unless, yes unless, it was deliberate.
Rothschild the Zionist over-financier was implementing the theories of Theodore Herzl on the German Jewish and non-Jewish population: "Anti-Semitism is the ally of Zionism".
The reality was, that Germany and Austria were far more philo-semitic than any other European country at that time.
The Jewish population was well integrated into the German population. Jewish persons played a major role in science, the arts, literature, academia, culture, media, politics and of course the economy.
If Germany and Austria had been oppressing Jews and discriminating against them, how could have Einstein and Freud have become so prominant?
There was a bit of Anti-Semitism there in some circles caused by the romantic nationalist movements and the idiotic pseudo-science of Eugenics, but this was not a majority opinion neither in academia nor in politics.
The left-wing parties had no trace of Anti-Semitism, and the Catholic Church was trying to mend it´s relationship with the Jews, so the Catholic Zentrum party wasn´t anti-semitic either. A few of the nationalist parties were, but it was only Hitler´s gang which proposed the deportation of Jews out of Germany.
And in spite of the economic devastation brought on by the Versailles treaty measures, a hyperinflation, where the middle class lost all it´s savings and the largest German banks were taken over by some Rothschild affiliates,
and in spite of an economic break-down of large parts of German industry where six million working class people lost their jobs,
in spite of all that, Hitler did not get a majority vote in any of the free elections.
He entered a coalition government with less than 30% of the votes. Then came the Reichstags-fire and the "Ermächtigungsgesetze", basically the Patriot Act in German. Afterwards under this so-called law he banned bit by bit all other parties, the labor unions and all non-Nazi political affiliations and took over the press, the radio and the movie-industry.
And while all the earlier non-Nazi governments had begged the allies to release Germany from further payment of those devastating reparation costs and get the Ruhr area back and so on, the allies wouldn´t relent.
However the minute Hitler came to power, the allies gave him everything he wanted. And he was even allowed to re-arm the country again, something the other governments weren´t allowed to do under the Versailles Treaty.
And in the very same minute the international Zionist organizations instigated a boycott against Germany with the headlines written in a British Zionist daily: "Judah declares war on Germany".
And only then and with the economic boom Hitler brought by upgrading German infrastructure and so ending the unemployment crises, only then he slowly received the support of the majority population.
And, following the incarcerations of tens of thousands of left-wingers and labor unionists,he still needed to oppress and persecute the Church putting thousands of believers and hundreds of clergy men into concentration camps in order to to keep the largest opposition groups down.
But yes, eventually the majority of Germans followed Hitler with disastrous consequences.
Would you call that chain of events a coincidence?
Rothschild and the Zionist intellectuals and strategists he sponsored were deliberately instigating Anti-Semitism in Germany in order to fulfill their Zionist dream of stealing Palestine from the Palestinians.
I´d say it was the dirtiest trick anybody ever played on his own people (and as collateral damage on the rest of the Europeans as well).
That´s why they afterwards called it "Holocaust", which is a Biblical term for burned offering, a sacrificial ritual where the victim animal is burned totally in order to get some wish granted from a deity (I won´t call that particular deity, the Zionists worship, God.)
There are actual a few prophetic passages in the Old Testament where the Prophets say, that God "does not want Holocausts and burned offerings" but a people with pure hearts and clean hands.
I´d say Rothschild and the Zionists did not fit that description.
- no-one special's blog
- Login to post comments

and if you really want to go waaaayyy back...
It should be noted that of the historic 12 tribes of Israel, all sharing a common Hebrew identity and monotheism, it was two tribes, Judah and the much smaller Benjamin that united the tribes into a kingdom. That's why the religion is called Judaism. When the Torah was first written down after years of oral transmission, the Judah added their vengeful conquering, and genocidal vision of the Hebrew deity, Yaweh to the existing tradition of a much more mellow patron of wandering shepherd tribes who provided them with the moral code of the ten commandments. In case anyone wondered why the same holy book that says thou shalt not kill, covet, etc. also enjoins its followers to go forth and drive out the people from their promised land, leaving no one alive, etc...
If I have any details wrong please someone correct me!
oh, and...
their monotheism was probably adapted from egyptian sun worship, as anyone who's seen Zeitgeist knows all about... and before they found Canaan, or Palestine, or whatever they came from down south in the Arabian peninsula. Except for the Ashkenazim who are descended from Turko-Asiatic people who converted by edict of their leaders centuries later and eventually migrated west through eastern europe and beyond... :)
actually, I was refering to the deities the Kabbalists
are worshipping, because there is ample evidence, that the Rothschilds at that time were Kabbala believers, and the Kabbala is not monotheistic.
Their deities are derived from the Babylonians and are pre-Jewish.
I don´t think the Zeitgeisters know everything, even if they tell themselves and everybody else they do in their ultimate truth video.
oh agreed...
the zeitgeisters are clever manipulators hurling grains of truth wrapped in cotton candy...
The how-Hitler-came-to-power
The how-Hitler-came-to-power story sounds very plausible. Hitler was a useful tool.
Regarding the Hebrew history: From what I could glean from Laura Knight-Jadcyzk's book (9/11 ultimate truth), she said there is some evidence that the Hebrew bible was not finalized until 1055 or so -- after the Khazar conversion -- and that they'd planted some information in there that jived with their eventual plan... Is there any truth to this idea? I'd have to go back and read it again. Other aspects of her book about the actual history of the Hebrews compared to what is "revealed" in the Bible are interesting - no historical evidence that jews were "expelled" from Egypt but there was a massive migration of all kinds of people into the area now known as Palestine/Isreal, but the impetus was climactic change due to meteorite activity. Interesting.
I mention this author because someone (Keenan I think) on this site recommended her book to me and it'd be fun to talk to others about her ideas. She gave an excellent account of 9/11, it's true, just not sure about the rest. Her other book, the secret history of the world, makes me really nervous, because parts of it seem pretty unlikely and incompatible with what is known about genetics. I'm not done with it - no time until summer.
E
a few points on that...
First, I didn't really like LKJ's book. On the idea that the Khazars had something to do with the Torah, well, I don't know about that--haven't seen that claim anywhere else, and I've been doing lots of reading from various sources. That the story of being enslaved in Egypt and liberated by Moses is apocryphal is pretty much accepted by everyone now.
Another strike against LKJ for me is that her website was mentioned during the Harvard antiwar rally when people saw my 9/11 truth sign. Though I don't and never have endorsed her site, Signs of the Times, one of the kids there was saying how that was one of the sites that claims "the Jews did it" (Jewdunit?) Of course this tactic is transparent and they had to square that claim with the fact that MY point to them was that Howard Zinn was on board at least with David Ray Griffin.
As for Hitler being a tool of... something, I have little doubt left on that score. Basically when you have a bunch of different authors separated by decades and ideology more or less hinting at the same thing you start to get the sense that it is well known but something that there is a battle of interpretation going on about. Look to the results, in my opinion is a good way. Ask Cui bono (who benefits.) Read each source and look for omissions in any of them of seemingly important facts, and ask yourself why they may have been omitted or downplayed.
I really must again recommend people read Douglas Reed's books, in order. Insanity Fair, his first, was written before WW2 but after the rise of Hitler. When you read Insanity Fair you'll notice that Reed has not yet connected the dots that he does in later works Far and Away and Controversy of Zion. All he does is reports his observations on the rise of Nazism and the seemingly unstoppable march to a second world war. He fought in the first one and is notably dumbfounded and disappointed at the insanity (hence the title) that seemed to be leading the world back to another. After reading that one you can read his other books and get a sense of the change in his outlook based on hindsight, and the actual results of the war. He rails against communism and bolshevism, but it's clear that he does so for the right reasons--that it was clear that these were false champions of the working classes, that they were practically given half of Europe by the conquerors of the Axis powers, and that there was clear evidence of collusion at the highest levels of the British and (especially later) the US with both the Nazis and the Communists.
Think of those two as the extreme equivalent of the fake left/right paradigm of today--indeed today's paradigm is firmly rooted in the old one--less extreme but certainly more subtle and insidious and therefore effective in the wielding of soft power against the representative of the new paradigm's enemy--radical Islamism.
I don't know about SotT
but I enthusiastically read Smoking Mirrors, whose author heartily endorses them. That's all.
no problem there...
We're all in the search for truth together, and if he's right and I'm wrong about SotT then so be it! SotT is of course not as bad as, say, Alex Jones--I'll give them that for sure!
No problem here, either
While I probably am a little too kind when it comes to harsh judgements -- and have paid the price, on occasion -- you might be just a tad too unkind, which could be attributed to the certainly special Harvard milieu.
Unkind??! ME? how DARE you...
HOW DARE YOU!!
he he... yeah, guilty as charged. I feel like I've been lied to all my life, and so dishonesty in the truth movement is particularly irksome, as it is at a place whose motto is Veritas and that took over $150,000 that neither my family nor I had in exchange for what they led us to believe was a top-notch education, not four years of indoctrination. But hey, things are getting better all the time...
That's the spirit!
How 'bout making things better yet by installing some automation that removes comments containing "viagra", "tramadol", etc.?
Like...this one, maybe?