Good for us their notion of "common sense" is not employed when it comes to erecting tall buildings...

"why, if there is this huge conspiracy, did they not just drive a truck into the basement and blow the buildings up"

on the Onion News Network segment. I think that Mr. al Farouq's admissions are enough to finally put these absurd theories to rest.

I hate to look at it this way, but notice how Hannity and Colmes behave differently when addressing Jesse's 9/11 concerns than when they address Rosie O'Donnell or Kevin Barrett's? Could it be that since Hannity and Colmes are both submissive weasels they are particularly vulnerable to confrontation with a flaming alpha male like Ventura? This guy has tremendous potential from what I've seen so far. Basically he is making 9/11 truth palatable to the kind of men who think of themselves as alpha males and yet are too insecure to actually reveal that they think differently than those around them.

Ventura’s 9/11 Questions Break Through Mainstream Media Dam (On FOX - Hannity & Colmes)

Let's see if the 911Blogger LIHOP brigade chastizes Ventura for letting himself get duped into discussing the "red (hot) herring" of physical evidence!  Let's see if they accuse him of conspiring to cover up the "really effective" crap like Sibel Edmonds' limited hangout striptease.  Let's see if they fault him for deflecting Colmes' question of whether the administration had foreknowledge!  Do we need to dig up all of Jon Gold et al's comments to the effect that "foreknowledge of the 'al Qaeda' attack is the most damning and persuasive evidence?" And that demolition is a "pet theory of certain divisive truthers?"

But hey, they know as well as we do which way the wind is blowing--they know when to shut up in other words.  They also are expert in changing their tune as slightly as necessary in order to retain what little is left of their credibility as truthers.