The 9/11 Blogger thread "David Ray Griffin is back! on The Kevin Barrett Show" was welcome news for me as I had been concerned for the health of David Ray Griffin.

I commented on the original post by asking why this "very good news" was not front page news?

Not News?

This is very good news and important for those concerned for the future of David Ray Griffin. Why has 9/11 Blogger not posted this as a news item?

End

This resulted in a hostile and disruptive comment from SnowCrash.

Welcome back

"...returns to touch bases with the movement he has galvanized -- and to explain why we should not accept reports of passenger phone calls as evidence that any airliners were hijacked on 9/11."

Welcome back.... to voice morphing, research assistant snitchjacketing, kidney failure Bin Laden and missiles and flyovers hitting the Pentagon! @ Kevin Barret's wonderful show of course!

Gosh, why wouldn't this be on the front page?

Mr. Griffin, I am glad you are alive and I wish you a healthy future, but I also wish you would stop sow nonsense and harm 9/11 Truth Movement with damaging associations. But, I fear we have all drifted too far apart now for any of us to take each other's advice.

Submitted by SnowCrash on Thu, 05/05/2011

I replied to this provocative comment by SnowCrash quoting some of the disruptive rhetoric.

SnowCrash Damage

Funny but I could say that, you, SnowCrash constantly "sow nonsense and harm 9/11 Truth Movement".

I don't care if I am banned for speaking the Truth.

I am giving up on 9/11 Blogger mainly because of SnowCrash and his constant domination of threads with repetitive nonsense and disruptive illogical rhetoric.

End

SnowCrash then re-edited his post. I replied with the comment below. My comment has since been deleted from 9/11 Blogger after having been published for two days with no explanation.

SnowCrash,

I notice that you often re-edit or revise your posts such as you have done with your first comment by changing your original wording from "sow nonsense and harm 9/11 Truth Movement" to "…stop inculcating the 9/11 Truth Movement with nonsense and harm it…etc"

I understand your need for a Thesaurus but this smacks of revisionism. Your later comment has also been re-edited.

I also notice you frequently allude to a "bond" with the 9/11 Blogger moderators by mentioning the name of Erik Larson in the same breath as your own and claiming "The owner of this site knows me well". Does this mean you are permitted to insult people by calling them "Nuts" without fear of being reprimanded?

Finally, the frequency with which you use variants of the word "Snitchjacket" should be seen as disruptive.

End