Is that Dov Zakheim is hella suspicious and I wouldn't be surprised to find him entangled in the 9/11 crimes. But I don't think that any of the evidence thus presented, all of it circumstancial, makes that strong a case. So he was involved with a company that developed remote control technology for airplanes? It's an interesting lead but not proof of anything--any more than Bush's brother being on the board of a company with a small role in WTC security makes him guilty. Same for signing the PNAC document--what kind of idiot would sign a document expressing a desire for a crime they were going to helping to commit? Did he help steal a ton of money from the American taxpayer through the Pentagon? Quite possibly. Does that have anything to do with 9/11? Who knows! I wouldn't be surprised if evidence turned up linking him to 9/11, but as yet there's not much there, that's all I'm saying. And when we have such clear evidence of the falsity of the official story, it seems that we should simply file our knowledge of Zakheim and his possible role and revisit it if an when it's warranted, not use him to build a plausible scenario that may or may not be right...