"My guess is that some people would rather we focus on the (fake) characters in the movement than on the (real) important issues"

Can you elaborate on who you were referring to when you said "some people"?

I have occasionally wondered if, by focusing as much as we do on this site on the (fake) characters in the movement as we have ever since the launching of WTCD, we aren't feeding too much into the "soap opera" aspect of the movement. It seems that one of the main purposes for blogging about these critiques of the movement/characters and calling out obvious BS, especially at the beginning of this site's history, was to provide an outlet for dissenting voices that were being (Repre)censored and banned at 911Blogger and TruthAction, and to not let the fakes off the hook or go unchallenged.

I've also occasionally thought that perhaps it might be a good idea to split the blog into 2 main sections - 1) News and research, 2) Movement politics/controversies - in order to not pollute the "important issues" with stuff that perhaps not everyone would be interested in, particularly newbies who are not versed in and familiar with these movement politics and drama the way most of this site's regulars have been.

Thoughts?