is because just the other day, on November 4th you said:

"I'm personally undecided about the flyover conclusion"
http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/2502#comment-18105

and I saw gretavo making even stronger statements doubting a flyover and others here suggesting we should not be so "strident" on the matter similar to what Jon Gold preaches about CD.

I am not concerned with what you choose to approach "newbies" with first although, yes, I am quite certain that giving them a copy of National Security Alert to take home would end up being extremely convincing to them.

So now, just 4 days later, it seems as though you ARE decided. That's good Keenan. That is exactly why I joined.

To discuss this and answer any questions and see if we can get on the same page.

"It's not that I don't accept the implications of what you present. Like I've said, I already accept that the logical conclusion is that there must have been a flyover."

Yes, in fact it's the only POSSIBLE conclusion. Which is why we are so strident and similarly why we can say that CD has been proven solely based off only the inferred evidence of a symmetrical free-fall collapse of building 7.

It is the only possible conclusion.

Anyway, it seems as though we are on the same page now so that's good.

If you could somehow add in the material about Roseborough to NSA I would think that would be really persuasive, even though Roseborough is refusing to verify and confirm anything at this point. Do you plan on doing this in a future edition?

Perhaps but that is not in the immediate plans.