I'm here to educate you on what we have accomplished and the implications thereof because there seemed to be some misunderstandings.

The main point of this thread that I prefer not to be diverted from is that a north side approach unequivocally proves the plane did not hit the light poles, generator trailer, or the building. In other words, it proves a flyover.

We will never know the true level of Lloyde's involvement and yes I'll concede for the sake of argument that there is a SLIGHT chance that he was coerced or is unwillingly involved but the evidence is VERY strong that this is not the case.

The north side evidence proves the cab scene staged whether or not the damage to the cab was fabricated on the scene or before so that type of speculation is irrelevant.

Either way Lloyde would be entirely aware that this scene was staged and how his cab really got damaged.

That is the point here.

Anyway, my message is to please take Cass's post not as a hostile assault but rather as a worst case analysis of your discourse style.

It WAS a hostile assault. I did not make any unsupported assertions yet she used innuendo and speculation to cast doubt on me personally.