Home » North of the Citgo Approach = Flyover (Pentagon)

Tahooey's picture

the pentagon diversion

Submitted by Tahooey on Sun, 2009-11-08 06:52.

Hi Cass,

I'm open to bad faith possibilities but I suspect the rigidity comes more from a conviction of belief after such a large undertaking to gather and assemble the evidence.

Although maybe time will come for CIT to move on to bigger (and better?) things - WTC witnesses - there's got to be scads of evidence from anyone who saw either of the plane impacts to anyone who might've heard / seen / smelled explosives (or not), to rescue and clean up workers who saw pools of molten metal.  I wish we could get their names and memories on record before the years and opportunity slip away. All of which might prove AfPak had pretty much nothing to do with 911.  As if we need any more proof at this point?

 

»

Reply