Thanks very much for your replies.

"But the damage to the trailer is not consistent with such a scenario particularly if you consider the fence in front of it that looks like it has this cookie cutter perfect round hole in it, in my opinion indicating it was pre-fabricated."

Well if the fence was set up to look like that how would that be inconsistent with a missile being fired from the trailer?  I think the video frames that were released and the directional damage both point to the possibility and I haven't seen anything yet (including the photos and discussion at your forum link) that rules it out. Although at the end of the day, it doesn't really matter; we know well enough what didn't happen (plane impacting pentagon).

I think your point against my theory 2 (allow him to do several media interviews and roam free to talk to whomever he wants while simply hoping he'll never leak) is a good one, but not 100% proof (after all, he did talk to the CIT and "leak" more or less, no?) How could such a "leaky" individual have been intentionally trusted with this kind of role?

FWIW I agree with you that (thanks to the evidence you've assembled) beyond any reasonable doubt, a flyover did happen.