We should not back down on the undeniable implications of evidence for CD of WTC or a flyover at the Pentagon.

I don't think it's fair to characterize that position as "forcing medicine down somebodies throat".

It's simply not shying away from the truth and the facts.

There is no more debate. We have proof. "9/11 WAS an inside job". Our slogan should not be "9/11 was probably an inside job!".

Of course there is nothing wrong with altering your rhetoric for strategic reasons depending on whomever it is you are speaking with at that moment and their level of being open to this type of info etc.

But I am talking in general here.....we should NOT be less "strident" when discussing the implications of the evidence for CD and this is also the case when it comes to the north side approach evidence proving a flyover.

BOTH conclusions are primarily based off "inference" from the evidence but neither are proven any less than the other.

Proof is proof. Dancing around that only creates the impression there is still a debate when there is not.

THAT is what is dangerous to our cause and in my opinion why people like Jon Gold are utterly useless.

As I said originally.....I didn't mean my Gold analogy as a personal insult. You are clearly a smart and logical guy whereas Gold is "pugnacious" and not so smart as characterized by Barrett!

But you straight up admitted to having a psychological barrier when it comes to the Pentagon due to past disinfo and that has clearly resulted in a reticence to accept the implications of what we present. This is perfectly understandable. I just showed up here to help you get over the "shellshock" of the full scope of what we have uncovered.
;)