Home ยป North of the Citgo Approach = Flyover (Pentagon)

Keenan's picture

Wow, I would never have dreamed that someone...

Submitted by Keenan on Sat, 2009-11-07 23:05.

would compare me to Jon GoldSurprised

But what do you think about 'insane Hussein's' comment above about strategy regarding whether to force the medicine down somebody's throat or simply putting the "new great tasting strawberry flavor" medicine bottle on the table and letting the person take it himself?

And casseis's comment?
http://www.wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/2495#comment-18050
"I'm speaking just from a discourse analysis perspective...
and I suspect if you looked carefully at the language Gage uses, he says things more like "The speed of the collapse is not compatible with what we know about any kind of destruction other than explosive demolition" rather than "CD is an indisputable fact." We all agree that it is, and at this site most of us agree that there is no way a big jet hit the Pentagon based on what was left behind. For that matter, we also agree that CIT has good evidence contradicting the official flightplan. But apart from the one eyewitness, flyover is an inference. People rightfully balk at CIT's heavy-handed insistence that this inference is anything other than an inference."

»

Reply