I am certainly not hoping for an alternative scenario, so I hope that's not how you interpreted my statement. In fact, I really do hope that additional witnesses, or videos, or other evidence will be found to corroborate a flyover, since that is the most likely scenario. But I don't think we can say that no more research/investigation needs to be done and we can go home and declare "case closed" at this point.

Look, for over 4 years I have resisted endorsing any specific theory of what exactly happened at the Pentagon, because I've seen that doing so too often was used as a trap to pigeonhole anybody who was a skeptic of the OCT of a 757 impact, focing them to argue for a specific theory that could then be attacked because of a lack of solid evidence for that theory. So, I have instead argued from a point of "I don't have to prove WHAT happened at the Pentagon in order to argue the obvious fact that a 757 did NOT crash there. It's the government's responsibility to prove what happened." Perhaps that is an outdated position now, what with the huge body of evidence published by CIT and other researchers more recently and I'm just shellshocked, who knows?

I disagree that it is a perfect analogy with Jon Gold, who claims that advocating the CD is a "speculative theory that hurts the movement." I have never said anythong of the sort regarding the flyover theory.