My sole point is that in my view, the best approach to the question of what happened at the Pentagon is first and foremost to make the general public aware that the official account has never been supported by solid evidence. The fact that in addition to that glaring omission of evidence we have reasons, such as the lack of debris and the evidence indicative of a flyover, to suspect a particular alternative version of events that is closer to what actually happened is not as important to stress to people.

This is exactly what we do in the first chapter of National Security Alert titled "A prima facie case for deception". So I guess we are in perfect agreement here. Unless of course you think the evidence we present proving the plane did not hit should be left out, minimized, or NOT the main focus. That isn't what you are saying right?

Out of curiosity--can you from your data conclude for sure that there weren't two planes involved, one that took the north of citgo path and another that conformed to the official flight path?

Yes.

Not only our data but out of the entire body of evidence there is absolutely nothing whatsoever that supports the notion of 2 planes other than Keith Wheelhouse's proven lie about the C-130 "shadowing" the attack jet and veering way during the explosion.

We know for fact that he lied about this and that the media reports in the Daily Press about his account served as a perfect excuse for others who may have seen the flyover.

Furthermore even though we knew there was nothing to support 2 planes we also knew that this was the purpose of proven liar/disinformation professional John Farmer who popped up out of nowhere and focused on CIT while working as THE main conduit for dubious govt supplied evidence such as the 84 RADES data. We KNEW his entire purpose was to float a 2-plane disinfo story, we called him out on it, foiled his plans by getting to the primary witnesses he planned to use (the Arlington Cemetery guys) and exposing them for the honest north side approach/C-130 witnesses that they really are.

Farmer planned to use their ambiguous Center for Military History transcripts (with names redacted) to support a wild disinfo theory that the E4B was the north side flyover and that AA77 still hit the building from the south side!

Even though we exposed his plot before it happened by interviewing the guys on camera on location he went on with it anyway and used Mark Gaffney's pathetic book on the E4B as his vehicle.

The full story about us exposing Farmer's failed 2-plane disinformation attempt before it was even launched is outlined in this article:

http://www.thepentacon.com/JohnFarmerDisinfo.htm