
Hi Kate
The lack of evidence of a 757 impact in the Pentagon was the second smoking gun type of physical evidence that made me a truther, after discovering the obvious WTC demolitions.
As far as CIT goes:
1) I'm not convinced that they started out with any agenda to prove any specific theory about what really happened at the Pentagon, but instead seemed to have formulated the NoC path conclusion and the flyover theory after they went and researched the witness testimony and discovered some surprising and convincing corroborated witness evidence.
2) I'm mainly interested in the evidence that was brought to light by the hard work of CIT and could care less about the personalities or characters of the messengers and the drama, much of which was instigated by their detractors. Sure, I agree that Craig and Aldo could have conducted themselves better and more maturely at times, and perhaps could have been less strident about their flyover conclusion. At the same time, however, when considering what they have had to endure with the relentless attacks and over-the-top smear campaign by certain fake LIHOP truthers who we've all come to know and love, it's hard to blame them for some eventual sharp reactions against their abusers. It became pretty clear to me right away that an obvious attempt to suppress evidence and manipulate the truth movement was a large part of the agenda of those who have been trying to destroy and marginalize CIT for a long time. I've learned through experience that such a pattern of "nothing to see here!" and attack the messenger type of behavior usually indicates that there definately IS something to see there.
April Gallup:
Your contention that CIT ignores her is absolutely not true. If you go and watch all the CIT videos and do a search on the CIT forum for "April Gallup", you will actually discover that they discussed her quite a bit, along with any other relevant witnesses as well as physical evidence surrounding the Pentagon bombing/attack on 9/11. Check it out at http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT.
It's a good idea to make more of an effort to be more informed and familiar with the researchers and their material before you attack them, so that you can provide an informed critique and avoid making a baseless uninformed attack.
This 17 minute interview of April Gallop by CIT is the longest known interview of April in the public domain:
http://www.thepentacon.com/AprilGallop
Portions of her interview are in CIT's "Pentacon" video. Have you ever watched Pentacon?
WTCD User Comments
10 years 15 weeks ago
10 years 29 weeks ago
10 years 44 weeks ago
11 years 16 weeks ago
11 years 17 weeks ago
11 years 19 weeks ago
11 years 26 weeks ago
11 years 26 weeks ago
11 years 26 weeks ago
11 years 26 weeks ago