
Just to play devil's advocate...
Couldn't that same argument be used against Richard Gage et al? For example one could say: "Gage and his group present very important points and present impressive facts, and raise some really eye opening questions. But they undermine their credibility by jumping to CONCLUSIONS about CD when in fact the entire scientific community in the world is not united behind this."
WTCD User Comments
10 years 15 weeks ago
10 years 29 weeks ago
10 years 44 weeks ago
11 years 16 weeks ago
11 years 17 weeks ago
11 years 19 weeks ago
11 years 26 weeks ago
11 years 26 weeks ago
11 years 26 weeks ago
11 years 26 weeks ago