
Curious
If the north path is established beyond a reasonable doubt, which it seems to be, and if the directional damage was staged from light pole 1 to the C Ring, I'm curious as to what other scenario you might propose. I know that Craig Ranke is very adamant that "a north approach proves flyover" and indeed some perhaps many people are uncomfortable with this attitude. However, I find it myself to be the logical conclusion given the photographic evidence that shows very clearly that a large airliner did not crash there. What else could possibly have happened? If a large aircraft was approaching the building and did not hit, then what else could have happened other than a flyover?
Chris Sarns has been doing an amusing job at trying to answer this question. He has come up with a scenario of a 737 north side impact.
WTCD User Comments
10 years 15 weeks ago
10 years 29 weeks ago
10 years 44 weeks ago
11 years 16 weeks ago
11 years 17 weeks ago
11 years 19 weeks ago
11 years 26 weeks ago
11 years 26 weeks ago
11 years 26 weeks ago
11 years 26 weeks ago