Adam Syed's picture

Curious

If the north path is established beyond a reasonable doubt, which it seems to be, and if the directional damage was staged from light pole 1 to the C Ring, I'm curious as to what other scenario you might propose. I know that Craig Ranke is very adamant that "a north approach proves flyover" and indeed some perhaps many people are uncomfortable with this attitude. However, I find it myself to be the logical conclusion given the photographic evidence that shows very clearly that a large airliner did not crash there. What else could possibly have happened? If a large aircraft was approaching the building and did not hit, then what else could have happened other than a flyover?

Chris Sarns has been doing an amusing job at trying to answer this question. He has come up with a scenario of a 737 north side impact.

Reply