"I've looked at the evidence and I don't find it convincing."

I'm paraphrasing not just what you just said, Julian, but what is said over and over by numerous individuals who dismiss (or claim to anyway) the evidence for explosive demolition of the twin towers and building 7, the lack of evidence for AA77 hitting the Pentagon, and pretty much any claim that runs counter to the "official" version of events of 9/11.

I don't know of anyone who would describe the evidence suggesting Israeli or militant Zionist involvement in 9/11 as anything but circumstancial. Now, circumstancial evidence is often incorrectly judged to be "bad" evidence. While the whole point of being circumstancial is that it does not prove a suspicion--only supports it--circumstancial evidence should not be dismissed as irrelevant. In fact, not single aspect of the official story proves the official account implicitly--it is based entirely on circumstancial evidence, some planted, some invented, and some simply irrelevant (like the existence of Mohammed Atta and his presence in a Portland, Maine airport on the morning of 9/11.)

Based on the flimsiest of such evidence the first accusations were made on TV the morning of 9/11 against bin Laden, and most of us bought into it because indeed, the whole thing seemed to just REEK of "islamic terrorists". It was DESIGNED to after all. Then when we learned more about the concept of false flag attacks and how they are actually very common in history, combined with learning of the circumstancial evidence linking militant Zionists to 9/11, many of us realized that as much as most people believe 9/11 reeked of "Islamic terrorism" what it in fact reeks of is "militant Zionist psyOp" which is something that unlike "Islamic terrorism" we have not been conditioned by popular culture to believe not only exists but is ubiquitous.

Is it possible that there is a TRIPLE bluff going on such that someone has made it only SEEM to reek of militant Zionist involvement? I guess that's possible, but we will never know, and I will suspect otherwise, if we cannot have reasonable discussions without being accused of being bigoted.