"You won’t get called an anti-Semite if you research the physics and methods of 9/11-related controlled demolition, but if you honestly follow the obvious and logical clues surrounding the CD results, you will end up in research areas that will certainly invite people to use the racist epithet of anti-Semite against you. However, if you concentrate on the ISI side of things, no bad things will be said about you."

very well put.

Obviously divisiveness is a powerful tool. I've often thought how abortion is one of the chief tools used to uphold the false dichotomy in American politics. Meanwhile the republican party is a twisted caricature of itself from 40 years ago. The question is who interjects these divisive issues to a point of prominence in the debate? Has outside pressure been somehow applied to Jon Gold (even lightly or well intentioned pressure?), or has he merely drawn his own conclusions and tired of the debate? If all of your posts have been as objective and calmly presented as this, then for someone to shut down your discussions of Judaism vs Zionism as being 'anti-Semitic' is highly suspect IMVHO.

It's interesting how they seem to have become such a central point in the truth movement only to have this happen... Despite this unfortunate turn I'll still visit 911b as there's always new stuff popping up. it may be a limited hangout but for now it's also a heavily traveled hangout.

“Many engineering deadlocks have been broken by people who are not engineers at all. This is simply because perspective is more important than IQ.” (Nicholas Negroponte)