I dont quite understand the labeling of terms such as "Zionists" and such. What I have seen of the whole debate is that Zionism is religious/political related. Just as Catholicism is another form of religion. If the information in the movie Zeitgeist has any truth to it, then zionism is just another control mechanism or tool for control.

Isnt it just easier to label the whole bunch as groups a)= good guys and group b)= bad guys, including zionist, jesuits, no-planers, laser beam theriosts etc...?

Correct me if Im wrong but putting labels on people and groups of people will only serve to divide this movement into smaller groups and hangs on the edge of what some people would call predjudicial and biased commentary?

To beat the intentional propoganda to confuse and dissect, we should keep things as simple as possible.
I personally tend to steer away from subjects that are based on such labels. its easy for people to point fingers and call this joe and that a Zionist, it steers the attention into a whole new direction.

Simplified example:
You go to a picnic with a friend. As you go to sit down, you notice a stream of ants coming out of your basket right into the food. You and your friend quickly jump to your feet and blame each other for placing the basket in harms way.
But instead of dissecting the facts, your friend starts to discribe that those are red ants and they eat alot more than black ants and because they are more carniverious than black ants they MUST be the guilty ones.

Now does this make any sense at all? We know the crime was done, we know they used explosives. Why is the argument whether they are black ants or red?
Lets just expose the basterds without putting labels on them and end this nightmare.

*************************

The 11th Day of Every Month