and I have no idea if it was Dr. Zack, but that's hardly the point. The point is that SOMEONE tried to frame an Arab for biowarfare activities shortly before the anthrax mailings. Then when the feds didn't bite, Barbara Rosenberg seems to have been behind the charge to point the finger at Hatfill, who has what many would consider an unsavory past and right wing proclivities--neither of which make him guilty as we have seen. After a costly effort to pursue Hatfill, we are given Ivins, another guy with perhaps an unorthodox personal life as a suspect with little apparent evidence, and who cannot defend himself or be tried for the crime. All of this points to me that there are a number of people (a conspiracy) trying to conceal the actual nature of the anthrax attacks. These conspirators have blamed first an arab and then a white right wing type and finally on a Catholic. All of these are known to be disliked militant Zionists. Even Ivins is quoted as criticizing in a letter to the editor a rabbi's decision not to have a dialogue with a local Imam. I don't think there is any doubt about what is being covered up in this case or with 9/11.