The HIPJ 9/11 "Debate"

gretavo's picture

Student group formed in response to events of 9/11. Accepted the official story and dedicated itself (in theory) to opposing a militaristic response. See also: The Problem With Harvard Student Activists

The following are email discussions with the group, which I archived:

  • [hipjplanning] Par.html
  • [hipjplanning] Part 3 Physi.html
  • [hipjplanning] Part 3 Physic.html
  • [hipjplanning] Part 3 Physics of the C.html
  • [hipjplanning] Part 3 Physics of the Collap.html
  • [hipjplanning] Part 3 Physics of the Collapse.html
  • [hipjplanning] Part 3.html
  • [hipjplanning] Part.html
  • [hipjplanning] What's Behind the London Attacks.eml.html
  • [hipjplanning] a recent article from the village voice.eml.html
  • [hipjplanning] more 9-11 coverup in progress.eml.html
  • [hipjplanning] timeline showing WTC7 damage and WTC steel removal.eml.html
  •  

    It seems strange that the HIPJ member who made most of the arguments against the use of explosives, Suvrat Raju, who at the time was working towards a PhD in physics of all things, seemed oblivious to the most basic physical principles surrounding the destruction of the WTC that David Chandler recently laid out in this paper:

    http://journalof911studies.com/volume/2010/ChandlerDownwardAccelerationOfWTC1.pdf