Hi Danse, Re: your debate challenge

Hi Danse,

Re: your debate challenge and invitation to join the TruthAction debate club, I was unaware that you were “waiting for me.” I have been EXTREMELY busy this semester helping my students prepare their research results for presentation at an upcoming undergrad biology conference, as well as working on three different research papers for publication. These papers, as is the case with the rest of my academic work, have absolutely nothing to do with 9/11, politics, or the Middle East. Whatever chunks of spare time outside of this work that I may get, I am trying to use that time to research (i.e. tons of reading), write, and finish the lengthy mini-book or serial article on the Zionist operational connections to 9/11 that Gretavo has been so kind to let me publish here at WTCD. The great majority of my time is spent either in the classroom or in the lab, NOT on the internets. If I have any blog time (on top of the 9/11 research-writing time), I prefer to spend my time here, reading and contributing, not because I am chicken or ball-less, or am in any way embarrassed by my views or the way I present them, but because time is very short, very precious, and I have a lot of further time-consuming work to do. For example, Part Three A & B of “Wired for Terror” deals with the essential history of militant Zionism in 1930s-40s Palestine. This is the time when the British press coined the term “terrorist,” and by that term, the press was referring to the Zionist underground wing of militant Revisionist Zionism in Palestine, represented at the time by the two guerilla groups Irgun Zvai Le’umi (the Irgun) and Lohamei Herut Yisrael (the LeHI, or ‘Stern Gang’). Here is the basic game plan for Part Three A & B, and as you can see, it entails a lot of time consuming work. [Part Four – “Israeli & Neocon Documents and Writings,” Part Five A – “Dossiers,” Part Five B – “9/11: The Operation and the Wonders of Technology”] I will also add that my presentation on Vladimir “Ze’ev” Jabotinsky will be quite historically fair and balanced. He is an interesting, complex man, and not as extreme as has sometimes been portrayed. I will also deal very briefly with the interesting phenomenon of the nationalist hero-image operating upon the ideological mindset of Zionism, and for that, a short historical detour will be necessary, with a look at the days of 19th century Italian unity and liberation with “the two Guiseppes” - Mazzini and Garibaldi - as well as the image of Ireland’s Michael Collins (Yitzhak Shamir’s personal hero). Amongst the LeHI and Irgun, Mussolini and Hitler were also greatly admired. History, as you know, is a study in 256 million shades of crazy grey.

“Wired for Terror,” Part Three A
Palestine – The Balfour Declaration to the Zionist “War of Independence”

1. America’s Entry into the First World War & the Balfour Declaration

2. 1930-1949, Two Decades of Zionist Terrorism in Palestine

2a. Vladimir Jabotinsky, “Betar,” “Irgun,” and the Zionist Revisionist Movement

2b. The Zionist Underground: History, Ideology and Operations

3. The Rabbi Weissmandl documents – “Zionists brought us to the Holocaust.”

“Wired for Terror,” Part Three B
Post-World War II – The Art of the Israeli False Flag Operation

(including ~ 200 references, a very conservative estimate at this point)

Why don’t you copy and paste some of the research I have already written up here, post it over at TruthAction, and then you and the folks over there can discuss it. I really don’t have the extra time to re-type all the things I have already thought out and typed out, and which are fully available here already. In this way, whatever I have written, or the Rabbis have written, can stand in for me as a text-style debating guest in your forum. The last time I looked, however, the written summary (still available here) of Israeli and American Neo-con operational involvement in 9/11 that I took a lot of personal time to put together just for you, was taken down from the TruthAction forum, so I have to honestly question your sincerity about having a discussion at the blog which has already taken down my voice as a part of the discussion which you now seemingly wish to pursue. I am not a dancing poodle to be ordered around by anonymous entities in the blogosphere, either. I have already explained the usage and allotment of my personal and professional time. Also on a security note, you may not fully understand the people behind very sensitive areas of 9/11 and the War on Terror, but it should be understood that taking on the Israeli right-wing and the AIPAC neo-cons of the U.S. is not like challenging a group of meek little Jewish rabbis to a debate. If you are working as an activist-researcher to expose the Israeli-American Neocon connection to 9/11 and the War on Terriers, you sir, are essentially living in the middle of Manhattan threatening to expose the operations and operational personnel of the fucking Cosa Nostra. I must therefore decline your request to seed your website’s logs with my email and IP information, but if Nick, Arab, or the Col. want to come by here and have a debate on some of the things I have posted here, they are welcome to speak, and we all promise to respect the rules of an actual debate, as in the kind held at Oxford or Cambridge. Rule # 1, however, is there will be no bringing to the debate transparently pathetic and generic canards such as the people at WTCD are proponents of “The Jooz control the world” or “the Jooz did 9/11” hypotheses. If you really think that that is what we are all about here, you are either going backwards in your thinking or in your memory of what is written here. We are not retarded, sometimes slightly pissed, outraged, and frustrated, but certainly not retarded. We also need to start distinguishing between a hypothesis and a theory. Big difference in the definitions. Have you started reading the Mearsheimer-Walt book yet?