Here's a recent post by user #7 at 911blogger.compromised

KSM...

Is really a "terrorist." Give this a read. He is a "bad guy." "Bad guys" do exist in the world. There are people we would consider "terrorists" and by "terrorists" I mean people willing to kill Americans specifically. Those people exist mostly because of our policies regarding the Middle East and specifically Israel. However, KSM had interesting connections to the ISI. Like a lot of so called "terrorists." We have a history of partnering with the ISI specifically for the purposes of terrorism, and by we, I mean the CIA. I know how the Government works to. I want a real criminal investigation as much as anybody in this movement. I never said he wasn't a "patsy." The way you're talking, you make it sound like I just invented this information in order to suddenly "turn" to the darkside, but it's been out FOR YEARS.

Edit: Please everyone watch this.

---

Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? The facts speak for themselves.

Submitted by Jon Gold on Sun, 11/22/2009 - 5:51pm.

I gave "this" a read and I really have to wonder what criteria "the Terror Timeline" uses to include material.  Many of us had been under the impression that it was meant to track mainstream reports having to do with 9/11.  But instead it seems to trace every aspect of the bogus "war on terror" from well before 9/11.  Here's one of the sources used in the page Gold links to:

1000 Years For Revenge by Peter Lance

Now, in 1000 Years for Revenge -- a groundbreaking investigative work that reads like an international thriller -- award-winning journalist Peter Lance reveals how the FBI missed dozens of opportunities to stop the attacks of September 11, dating back to 1989. Drawing on interviews with scores of central figures in the story, as well as hundreds of pages of declassified documents, Lance uncovers startling evidence of FBI negligence that even a joint congressional committee missed. Among his revelations:

• From the early 1990s, Osama bin Laden was running an active al Qaeda terror cell in New York City -- with blind sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman as its leader and Ramzi Yousef as its master bomb maker.
• The FBI had sufficient intelligence to capture Yousef before he built the first World Trade Center bomb in 1993. In 1995, they learned that he had already set the 9/11 suicide-hijacking plot in motion from Manila -- that he was planning "to return to the U.S. to attack the World Trade Center a second time." Yet each time the FBI missed the opportunity to stop him.
• FBI agent Nancy Floyd used a key informant to penetrate the cell of Sheikh Rahman -- only to have the operation sandbagged by her FBI supervisor.
• Most alarming, in 1992, a confidant of Sheikh Rahman removed the plans for the World Trade Center from FDNY headquarters. Ronnie Bucca brought the information to the FBI in 1999 but he was ignored.

Here's a few more titles from the "amazing, incredible, pick your word" Terror Timeline on which Jon Gold claims to base his oppostion to "terrorists" (i.e. Arabs and Muslims:)

Seeds of Terror: An Eyewitness Account of Al-Qaeda's Newest Center of Operations in Southeast Asia (Hardcover)

The New Jackals: Ramzi Yousef, Osama bin Laden and the Future of Terrorism (Hardcover)

Inside Al Qaeda: Global Network of Terror (Paperback)

~ Rohan Gunaratna 

 

(Author)

"Al Qaeda's emir-general, Osama bin Muhammad bin Laden, was born in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, on July 30, 1957..." 

Ex-State Department Security Officer Charges Pre-9/11 Cover-Up By ALEXANDER COCKBURN

Unholy Terror: Bosnia, Al-Qa'ida, and the Rise of Global Jihad (Hardcover)

~ John R. Schindler

Are any of the above credible sources about 9/11 or anything related? For that matter, are the various other mainstream news sources cited by the Terror Timeline credible with regard to 9/11? Why do people let Jon Gold get away with what is so obviously an effort to continue to frame arabs and muslims for terrorist acts?