911 Truth Outshines Phony "Debunkers" on Press TV

Do you consider yourself a skeptical person? You may ask me - "About what?" How about the reasons you are asked by your government to surrender your liberty? Shouldn't the surrender of your inalienable Constitutional Liberties top any list of reasons to be skeptical? And if every reason given for you to give up your freedom originates with the attacks of September 11, 2001 would you agree it is your solemn duty to be skeptical of the explanations provided to you by your PUBLIC SERVANTS about what happened that day? Please watch the videos below.

The "debunkers" in this video seem to be pleading with the public not to http://www.radiodujour.com/people/griffin_david_ray/mp3/20080219_charles... "> look behind the curtain (audio) . One of the defenders of the official conspiracy theory, Nick Pope, waves his ragged copy of the http://technorati.com/videos/youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DxbY5_qtz83M "> now debunked (videos) official 911 Commission Report as if holding up a holy book. He makes excuses for why the 911 commissioners really didn't mean it when they said they were set up to fail. In the first segment Nick Pope makes the illogical assertion that the U.S. government was too busy http://rawstory.com/news/2008/US_officials_stopped_plans_to_kill_1006.ht... "> going after the perpetrators of 911 (with video) to investigate who it was that is actually responsible for the attacks. That's funny, I thought the trial was supposed to precede the execution.

Wendy Grossman, from Skeptic magazine - who is not at all skeptical of the official conspiracy perpetrated by an http://www.viewzone.com/dualcitizen.html "> administration of http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BEsZMvrq-I "> proven liars (video) makes me wonder what she is actually skeptical about. It seems she is only skeptical of http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/ "> highly credible U.S. citizens and others wising up to lie after lie after http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/09/politics/09POWE.html?ei=5007&en=6bb545... "> lie . The "debunkers" theorize about grief-driven rationales for so-called conspiracy theorists - never considering that the http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm "> facts belie the official conspiracy theory as a fraud. Wendy Grossman finds it very hard to believe that Bush was involved in "blowing up the WTC buildings" or that he is going to "blow up America." I find that hard to believe too Wendy, but shouldn't we forget about what we want to believe, gather and evaluate evidence, then draw conclusions? Or should we bury our heads in the sand as you and Nick propose and shield our eyes from truth we find hard to believe? Hey Wendy and Nick - I've got a bridge for sale - wanna' buy it?

Here are two of the seven segments, but all worth watching.

This segment discusses why no 911 truth in the media