It's looking more and more like Kevin Ryan might be part of the controlled opposition tasked with diverting the truth movement into old dead-end wild goose chases to LIHOP Land while covering up for some of the real perpetrators of 9/11.

Kevin Ryan just published a follow up article to his earlier piece on "Demolition Access to the World Trade Center" on 911Blogger investigating connections to WTC security firm Stratesec: The History of Wirt Dexter Walker: Russell & Company, the CIA and 9/11. Again, like his earlier piece, it's all about focusing on alleged connections to the Bush and Bin Laden families, no matter how tenuous, but strangely there is absolutely no mention of Larry Silverstein, the NY Port Authority, Jerome Hauer, or Kroll, Inc. - who was given $2.5 million to "revamp" security at the complex and had intimate involvement with security at the WTC up to the day of 9/11. Crucial parts of the security were also provided by the Port Authority, headed by Lewis Eisenberg, who also had close ties to the Bush Administration, Wall Street, and Israeli interests. David Lim, a Port Authority police officer who was stationed at the WTC with his bomb-sniffing dog Sirius, told the 9/11 Commission that the Port Authority police were responsible for the safety of those at the complex.

How can anyone write about security of the WTC and leave out such crucial information, such as Kroll, Inc., otherwise known as the "Wallstreet's CIA" and their connections to other key people influencing the control, ownership, and policy of security regarding the WTC complex, as well as Lewis Eisenberg's NY Port Authority? Something is very wrong with this picture.

Let's review a little bit about the crucial entities controlling security at the WTC that Kevin Ryan saw fit to completely ignore:

The New York Port Authority (Chaired by Zionist Lewis Eisenberg) paid Kroll, Inc. $2.5 million to "revamp" security at the WTC complex. The owners of Kroll were two Zionists named Jules & Jeremy Kroll. The managing director of Kroll at the time was Jerome M. Hauer, who is a staunch Zionist and whose mother, Rose Muscatine Hauer, is an Honorary President of the New York Chapter of Hadassah, the Daughters of Zion movement that is one of the central Zionist organizations involved in the creation and maintenance of the State of Israel. Jerome Hauer was also the guy chosen to run Mayor Rudy Guiliani's office of emergency management (OEM) from 1996 to 2000. He is the key individual that pushed for this office to be placed in Silverstein's building 7. Jerome Hauer, as head of Kroll, inc., hired his friend John O'Neill (who quit the FBI as head of the Counter-Terrorism office for the Bush Administration on August 22) to be WTC security director and had him start on August 23rd, 2001. O’Neill moved into his new office on the 34th floor of the South Tower and quickly began criticizing the inadequate security. Ironically, he was killed on 9/11 when he was caught inside one of the towers when it was demolished with explosives. There is much more that people should know about this Jerome Hauer fellow regarding his foreknowledge of 9/11 and participation in the subsequent cover-up that is discussed here.

Lewis Eisenberg was head of the Port Authority of New York and authorized the first ever lease transfer of the WTC complex to his Zionist brethren Larry Silverstein and Frank Lowy in July of 2001. Eisenberg was a large contributor to the Bush-Cheney presidential campaign, as well as a partner in the Zionist-controlled bank Goldman-Sachs. There's much more to this guy as well regarding involvement with pro-Israeli government pressure groups in the U.S. The security at the WTC contnued to be the primary responsibility of the NY Port Authority, even after the lease transfer of the WTC in July of 2001 to Silverstein (for the twin towers and building 7) and Lowy (for the 427000-square-foot retail mall in the WTC basement). It is the Port Authority who contnued to use their own Port Authority police force to patrol and protect the complex. It is the Port Authority who contracted out the electronic security upgrades of the WTC complex from 1996 into 2001. It is the Port Authority who brought in Kroll, Inc. to help improve and manage security at the WTC.

As far as Stratesec, known previously as Securacom when they had a contract to help upgrade electronic security at the WTC, they were never "running security" of the WTC, as Kevin Ryan falsely implies. Rather, it appears they were primarily involved with installing a particular electronic system at the WTC. Securacom got an $8.3 million World Trade Center security contract from the NY Port Authority in October 1996 and received about $9.2 million from the WTC job from 1996 to 1998. But in 1998, the company was "excused from the project" because it could not fulfill the work, according to former manager Al Weinstein, and the electronic security work at the WTC was taken over by EJ Electric, a larger contractor.
http://www.washingtonspectator.com/articles/20050215bushes_3.cfm

If this is correct, then Securacom’s involvement in WTC security possibly ended in 1998, and regardless, it would appear that the primary day-to-day security was handled by the NY Port Authority and Kroll, Inc..

It boggles my mind that Kevin Ryan can be so selective in his research and would leave out such crucial information regarding the more important parties that had more influence and control over the security situation than the supposed "Bush family connected" Securacom.

Sorry Kevin, but your "investigative work" is starting to smell like something is rotten in the state of LIHOP Land. I think you have some 'splainin' to do...

Why doesn't Kevin Ryan ever talk about these guys?

or this guy?

Jerome Hauer of Kroll, Inc.

Some other falsehoods in Kevin Ryan's "research" paper on Stratesec that should be mentioned:

Kevin Ryan states:

In the years leading up to 9/11, the company [Stratesec] had security contracts with the organization that managed Dulles Airport, where Flight 77 took off that day, and with United Airlines, which owned two of the other three hijacked planes.

This statement is a bit misleading. In fact, Stratesec did not handle passenger screening at Dulles, where AA77 allegedly took off from. According to Dave Swennes, a contracting official for the Metropolitan Washington Airport Authority, its three-year contract was for maintenance of security systems. The company maintained the airfield access system, the closed circuit television system and electronic badging. http://www.washingtonspectator.org/articles/20050215bushes_2.cfm

The Israeli firm ICTS International was the Security company in charge of the actual passenger screening at Dulles as well as Boston Logan and Newark airports from where the other 3 flights originated. In other words, the passenger screening at all 9/11 airports was handled by one Israeli owned company - ICTS - sometimes through wholly owned subsidiaries like Huntleigh USA Corporation. According to the ICTS web site (http://www.icts-int.com/content3a9f.html?id=6): Since 1998, ICTS provided airline passenger screening services at 47 US airports, including all the international aviation gateways in the USA. Incidently, ICTS was also in charge of airport security at Amsterdam's Schipol Airoport when the shoe bomber Richard Reid boarded a plane with a shoe bomb (allegedly). Most of its personnel are ex-Shin Bet officers, and Mossad agents could easily find employment with the company without the management knowing who they were or what their purpose really was. ICTS has also long been suspected of being a Mossad front company. http://whatreallyhappened.com/ICTS.html

Again, why would Kevin not even mention ICTS if he was discussing the security of these 3 airports, which he includes in the list of "facilities that were central to the crimes of 9/11"? Is it because Stratesec, who was not actually "running security" at any of the airports on 9/11, had vague connections to the "evil Arabs" via a Kuwaiti investment company Kuwait-American Corporation (KuwAm), that helps pin 9/11 on those evil 'Mooooslims' (if one really contorts their imagination, aided by a dash of islamophobia), while ICTS, who WAS actually "running security" at ALL the airports on 9/11 has inconvenient connections to a state that shall not be named - the same state that Silverstein, Hauer, Eisenberg, Lowy, and other entities controlling security at the WTC that Kevin forgot to mention, have connections to? Anybody else see a pattern here?