Really very simple. The movement can continue to create division by using labels no better than others used throughout history (I'm sure you can think of some), or, the movement can mature, and realize that words that separate us, are not helpful.

We make such a big stink about Dubya being the divider and not the uniter. Why aren't we held to the same standards? Anyway, nice talking to everyone. Keep up the good work. Hope to see you on 7/4 in Philadelphia.

Posted by King Midas over at the blogger, in the midst of a series of comments where he preaches against the use of the two acronyms. My question: is this disingenuousness or cluelessness? I was really tempted to repeat for about the bazillionth time that the terms underline the CRUCIAL distinction among truthers: are you trying to use 9/11 truth to dismantle the myths of Islamofascism, scary brown people, and the war on terror or are you satisfied with merely pinning the blame on the Bush regime?

I didn't get into it over there, because I think contributing to a shitstorm in the middle of a thread in which most people are thanking dz is kinda mean.