gretavo's picture

um, it's not about being smart or not

it's about presenting a limited analysis of a problem like disinfo in the 9/11 truth movement, e.g. by not trying to go beyond the basics of Fetzer's main points on the subject. The fact is that many people have come to understand that Jon Gold is a pretty good example of a subtle kind of disinfo where he makes no absurd claims, just does his best to make it seem that a) he is more trustworthy than he really is and b)he is convinced of things like that Larry Silverstein is not implicated in the events but Pakistan is.

You don't even acknowledge that some people believe in that kind of subtle disinfo, while having a paper published by the journal of 9/11 studies presumably to demonstrate how good your ideas are. i suppose i could submit a rebuttal to the journal but given that i would have to call out such a well regarded (giggle) member of the movement as jon gold to do so i doubt it would be worth the time since it would probably go unpublished...

Reply