Dr. Graham's 9/11 - Another Goose Chase By Sander Hicks?

Congrats on that to all who have, for years, pointed out that LIHOP is ridiculous in the face of the things like the demolition of WTC 7.

Here's something that always concerns me or at least it perks my ears up everytime...

I have been reading the Graham report and the one thing that constantly baffles me about these LIHOP narratives is how ridiculous I perceive the data & sources and how someone like Hicks is waging a campaign, a "West Coast Tour" based on it.

I thought the Graham Report was more of a journal type account of his encounters. It's more like a spaced out journal written by memory of events before 9/11/2001...but...it has all this post 9/11 rhetoric added for flare I guess.

He talks of pre-emptive strikes, being united with Bush to defeat the terrorists...and calls Saddam the "New Hitler"....

To me, these are words of a guy who turned to Fox News after the attacks of 9/11/2001. Using his Fox Programmed understanding of 9/11, it all started to make sense.

But I could be wrong. That's why I'm wasting...I mean spending my time reading this 'weird' Graham Report.

Thanks for posting all this crazy Dr. Graham stuff about a truly weird story, filled with weird names, and strange people. In Pakistan and India, “Amurican” names also look weird.

The ongoing, irrational attachment to the LIHOP limited hangout version of things by some folks in the 9/11Truth movement, who should know better, is a pretty sad thing to see, especially so at this late date. It certainly looked like a fairly legitimate, primary angle of research back in 2003-2004, when I started out on the trail, but now, either the person is new and hasn’t put everything together yet, or the particular person promoting the ahistoric LIHOP version of 9/11 and pushing “the Muslims did it” angle is perhaps, who knows, working for somebody who wants LIHOP pushed as a possible escape route in case the cover-up of the operation starts really breaking down. And for the real 9/11 perps (planners and operators), the LIHOP story screws and sacrifices Bush and Cheney, protects the guilty of “Country A,” yet still maintains the ever important “false flag” flying from the mast of the operation. Within the whole history of international Israeli false flag operations, flying the false “crazy Muslim terrorist” flag is always an important, and giveaway signature characteristic of these affairs. And besides, afterwards, Hollywood gets to make really awesome “krazy Muslim terrorist hijacker” movies where Bruce Willis gets to save the day with glass stuck in his feet. The real 9/11 story is not as dramatic. Its much more technological. I mean, who wants to watch a movie about some clean-cut Israeli dude installing an FTS remote system in a Boeing 767 at an empty hangar near Logan Airport? Boring, right? “Makeup! Put some beards on those guys. I want them more Scary, goddammit!”

The Mossad demolition crews stationed in New York and New Jersey for the wiring up of the World Trade Center buildings 1, 2, and 7, and the mechanical installation jobs for FTS remote operation of three aircraft by Israeli security companies stationed at Logan and Newark Airports is a story that takes away the Muslim “false flag” and reveals the real perpetrators and operators behind the curtain. This story must be kept at the gates of the 9/11 truth movement, otherwise the gates and walls will be breached and the barbarians of real 9/11 truth will storm the walled city of LIHOP.

Sander Hicks: I saw him for the first time on YouTube a month or so ago. He seemed like a little rabbit jacked up on crank. His eyes were all big and staring like he had just come out of one of those CIA mind fuck programs. He was hard to watch. He is most definitely LIHOP obsessed, however. I wonder how much he gets paid for his performances. At a nearby imaginary university we are offering a full year course on LIHOP, but it is being offered as part of a course called “9/11 Backstory 101.” If people want to spend all their time studying and researching and analyzing a patented intelligence agency-designed backstory, with its several phony breadcrumb trails, that’s fine, but they should know that they are studying the part of the intelligence operation that is designed to lead away from the actual perpetrators. While analyzing the fake trail to nowhere, they should ask themselves who would have the most to gain by constructing the trail in this manner, and whose agenda would be satisfied best by blaming this attack on America on Muslims. These are highly valid questions that any political history detective would ask themselves.

Long story short – somebody with authority (as in Port Authority) and night-time carte blanche access to three buildings in the World Trade Center complex had several demo crews wire these buildings for a special demolition to take place on 9/11/01. If you still think kerosene melted the twin towers and WTC7, I can’t help you anymore. Friends of the building people were interfacing with other people who happened to have aeronautical remote control equipment and also happened to control the security for Logan Airport in Boston and Newark International, as well as all security for American and United Airlines. Furthermore, friends of both of these groups of people also happened to occupy key positions in the Pentagon, CIA, FBI, and White House. So far in this story, there are no Arabs involved in the actual 9/11 operation or its planning. The Arab patsies, at least the small crew that was physically in the U.S. “being seen,” the ones playing the part of jihadi flight school students, were most likely, days ahead of the 9/11 date, moved out of the U.S. where they were either paid for their parts and spared, or just assassinated, like Muhammad Atta appears to have been. And then there were all those other “9/11 hijackers” who had never set foot in the United States in their lives, and didn’t find out that they had hijacked a plane and rammed it into a building until they read it in their local papers.

The 9/11 Truth Movement always says “Ask questions, Demand answers, so yeah, I have a few questions that, for some reason, don’t seem to be popular topics of debate and discussion on what some have called “mainstream” 9/11 truth websites. Every movement, it seems, even truth movements, eventually sell out to what is comfortably acceptable, and then an “orthodoxy” forms around those things. Unfortunately the static nature of a comfortable orthodoxy is always at odds with the processes of full “truth” and “discovery,” both of which hate static acceptance and like to move the ball forward through necessary revisionism based upon new information.

Anyways, good work, J