Open Letter To Reprehensor & 911Blogger.com
This is an e-mail I sent to Reprehensor at 911Blogger.com to request a comment on the rampant bannings and selective moderation of 'certain' 911 Truth activists at 911Blogger.com. I encourage everyone that has been banned from discussing 911 Truth related issues at 911Blogger, with no explanation or warnings, to ask Reprehensor for an explanation with examples of what you did wrong to get banned.
-----
-An Open Letter To Reprehensor & 911Blogger.com -
Reprehensor, I am confused & insulted that you have decided to secretly ban a number of 911 Truth activists from 911Blogger.com, including myself with, no explanation what-so-ever. (JPASS)
Have you forgotten that many of us have dedicated our lives to the 911 Truth Movement? The course of action 911Blogger.com has taken is insulting and suspicious to me as a 911Truth activist. Secret backdoor bannings and selective moderation of discussions is not right, especially when done in secret as 911blogger.com has been doing.
My thoughts and discussions at 911Blogger.com were long ago thrown into the 'moderation bin' with no explanation from you or any of the others who 'moderate' communications at 911Blogger.com. No reason, no warning, no explanation. Secret moderation. My comments have rarely been 'oked'.
Now, out of no where, I am banned from your website 911Blogger.com. Again, I am given no explanation at all?
I would like to ask 911Blogger.com, officially, to release a comment on the rampant bannings and selective moderation of 911 Truth activists at 911Blogger.com. What are your reasons for these bannings and selective moderation?
I would like to know who moderates the discussions at 911Blogger.com and who makes the decision on when and why to ban 911 Truth activists.
And finally, why have I been banned from 911Blogger.com? Please provide examples of where I have gone astray in your view. Examples that warrant my expulsion from discussing 911 Truth at your website, 911Blogger.com.
911Blogger.com has decided to conduct this selective moderation in secret...hidden from the view of the community which would & should scrutinize such actions.
The only course for 911Truth...the ONLY course...is a course of honest, OPEN, and transparent activism and communication. 911Blogger.com's style of secret, back-door decision making smacks of the hypocrisy that we, as 911Truth activist, claim to be fighting against.
Please respond to my questions, specifically I would like to know why I am banned from your website. Please provide examples.
Sincerely,
JPass
- Jpass's blog
- Login to post comments
"I am confused"
Well, you got that much right! Good job.
Reprehensor hardly banned you "secretly" - he made a whole big blog announcing that you scumbags have been kicked off. It is a privately owned site you know... please stop whining about not being allowed there! You scumbags censor any non-groupthink post here... right?
Yeah... We do... Right?
Would be funny if the topic wasn't so crucial to so many lives. Have fun in your circle jerk of treason over there, and feel free to post 'annoymously' from behind your prxy servers, cowards.
anonymous commenting turned off pending...
the racist jerk from 911blogger who keeps spamming the comment queue with nastiness. Thanks for your patience, truly anonymous folks!
Scumbags?
Wow, considering the circumstances, I am not surprisd.
Ummm...so what is official policy at 911Blogger.com? You guys ban people based on sites they visit? I visit and discuss things on many sites. Do I need to submit my list of sites to Reprehensor to see if you all approve of them?
The truth is that your bannings and squashing of discussions has not been justified.
You show me one post, one single example of why you believe that I am scumbag sir. One example of why I should be banned from an activist site.
Good day.
JPass
i think its not a sir but a ma'am
although the colonel may be confused about that fact itself. just a guess. who else has the time to sit around and monitor what other people are saying about them.
And it's a privately owned site, how can they control discourse if they let just anyone in?
===================
Great minds think for themselves. The rest of you idiots can go to 911blogger every day to find out what to think.
my guess is this...
the idea is always to maintain ostensible diversity masking actual uniformity--i.e. make it look like people actually have different opinions, to ensure credibility. this was the idea behind creating Nico Haupt after all--the insane nut who would make the limited hangout shills look legit. that didn't quite work and people like us showed up at blogger and provided genuine dissent. that's when they banned a few of us all the while suggesting that we "take it to truthaction" which was more about debate. then when we did, Jon Gold followed us there and began his whining, along with John Albanese and other fake truthers from 911blogger. So we had to be banned from there too. Basically anything real, anything they can't control, they have to get rid of. Of course that only works online, not out in the real world where I reach 20 times more people than I do online... :)
What Jpass said
Also can I add that I havent posted to 911b in months and when I did I never called anyone an asshat, shill, scumbag etc so I'll assume I'm banned for not contributing enough? I did however contribute money at one point as did many posters here and now the moderator fantasizes about stamping on our faces.
 There's just no pleasing some folk.