More Links Between Silverstein and Netanyahu

gretavo's picture

This first link is from Thierry Meyssan, author of the first 9/11 truth book The Big Lie, which apparently has a sequel out.  Not sure why he says Silverstein took over the WTC in January 2001 (it was mid-July) but he does say that Silverstein, aka Lucky Larry, was the treasurer not just of the Jonathan Institute, an anti-Muslim propaganda outfit named after Netanyahu's late brother, but also of Netanyahu's political campaigns?!  Yikes, if true.  I expect 911blogger to get on this immediately--NOT!  :)

http://www.voltairenet.org/article164399.html

 

Un autre quotidien israélien, Maariv, avait rapporté dans son édition du 17 avril 2008 que Benjamin Netanyahu, alors leader du Likoud, a affirmé au cours d’une conférence à l’université Bar Ilan que les attentats du 11-Septembre avaient été bénéfiques pour Israël.

« Nous profitons d’une chose, ce sont les attentats contre les Tours jumelles et le Pentagone, et l’attaque américaine contre l’Irak », a-t-il déclaré selon Maariv. Ces événements « ont fait basculer l’opinion publique américaine en notre faveur »

Le professeur Ben-Tzion Netanyahu fut le secrétaire personnel de Ze’ev Jabotinsky, le père du sionisme révisionniste. Dans les années 80-90, il anima avec son fils Benjamin et George H. Bush (le père), le Jonathan Institute (du nom de son fils ainé Jonathan Netanyahu, mort au combat) et élabora le concept médiatique de « terrorisme international » [1]

En janvier 2001, le trésorier du Jonathan Institute et des campagnes électorales des Netanyahu, le promoteur immobilier Larry Silverstein, acquit le World Trade Center de New York. Il souscrivit une police d’assurance qu’il rédigea lui-même prévoyant des indemnités pour chaque attentat qui pourrait endommager le WTC. Après le 11-Septembre, il réclama —au delà d’une franchise— une double indemnisation au motif qu’il y avait eu deux attentats distincts commis avec deux avions différents. A l’issue de plusieurs procès, il toucha 4, 5 milliards de dollars, réalisant une plus-value nette d’1 milliard de dollars.

===

[1] L’Effroyable imposture 2, Manipulations et désinformations, par Thierry Meyssan (Jean-Paul Bertrand éd., 2007, chapitre « L’invention du "terrorisme islamique" ».

 

http://www.covertaction.org/%20%09%20index.php?

option=com_content&task=view&id=117&Itemid=83

The New Red Scare

It would be a mistake to imagine that George W. Bush declared war on terrorism on September 11. Rather he "re-declared" a war that Ronald Reagan had first created and financed, in the mid-1980s. While Jimmy Carter had used "human rights" as a focus for imposing U.S. hegemony, Ronald Reagan replaced that doctrine with his own war against "international terrorism." Within days of his inauguration, Secretary of State Alexander Haig announced that "international terrorism will take the place of human rights [as] our concern, because it is the ultimate ... abuse of human rights." This fundamental shift in policy was due in large part to the influence of a shadowy Israeli-American organization, the Jonathan Institute, founded in 1979 by Benjamin Netanyahu, the future Israeli prime minister, whose brother Jonathan was killed in the commando raid on Uganda's Entebbe airport in 1976.

The Jonathan Institute became the emblematic think tank of Israeli and U.S. officials. The National Security state was giving way to the Counter-Terrorist state, with a catalogue of strategies that would come fully into the open when the September 11 attack made it possible for U.S. officials to speak without ambiguity.

After the demise of the Soviet Union, the strategic equation changed only in its new definition of the Enemy. The acceptable policies of the Counter-Terrorist state were defined. A strong case can be made that the Jonathan Institute was established to insure not just the defeat of the Democrats in 1980, but the election of a Republican pledged to the international strategies of the Institute. The provocative underlying message promoted was: We must not wait to be attacked, but must institute "preemptive retaliation," a formula already expressed in early meetings of the Jonathan Institute.

These themes—the backbone of Israeli policy against the Palestinians and the rationale for its continued occupation of their territory—soon became a part of the Reagan Doctrine. The precursor of the U.S.A. Patriot Act of 2002 can be found in Reagan's 1984 National Security Decision directive (NSDD) 138, authorizing paramilitary and military anti-terrorist squads as well as preemptive retaliation.

http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Jonathan_Institute

Jonathan Institute, extract from The "Terrorism" Industry

From SpinProfiles

Jump to: navigation, search

The Jonathan Institute was the most important product of the new Israeli public relations strategy. The institute was founded in 1979 by Benjamin Netanyahu, a prominent rightist and Israeli ambassador to the United States, who named the organization after his brother Jonathan, who died in the Entebbe airport raid in 1976. Its propaganda function and its design to influence U.S. and other Western opinion makers were suggested by its opening offices in Washington, D.C., and New York, as well as in Jerusalem. Its main activity from its birth was the organization of conferences, carefully designed to bring in sympathetic leaders, experts, and journalists to get across the message: the PLO is a terrorist organization. and the Soviet Union is its parent and supporter.

The names of the institute's board of directors are not made public, but the organization serves as a virtual arm of the Israeli state. [1] Institute officials told Dial Torgerson of the 'Los Angeles Times' that while the organization was privately financed, the 1979 conference was being run "with the assistance of the Israeli government."[2] Brian Crozier, a participant in the 1979 conference, wrote in the National Review that the committee organized to sponsor the conference included Menachem Begin, "[who] heads the Committee, followed by Moshe Dayan. . . and most of the famous names in Israel's brief history."[3]

The two conferences organized by the Jonathan Institute, in Jerusalem in July 1979 and in Washington, D.C., in June 1984, were major events and highly effective for Israeli and Western propaganda. Both drew in many high officials and big-name journalists and successfully attracted extensive press coverage on the threat of terrorism as portrayed in the Western model. The 1979 conference, held under heavy army and police guard, attracted some four hundred journalists. Attendees included Annie Kriegel and Jacques Soustelle from France; [4] Lord Alun Chalfont, Brian Crozier, Paul Johnson, and Robert Moss from Great Britain; George Bush, Ray Cline, Midge Decter, Norman Podhoretz, Claire Sterling, Ben Wattenberg, George Will, and Senators John Danforth and Henry Jackson from the United States; and numerous Israeli political, military, and intelligence figures.[5]

The opening session of the 1979 conference was addressed by Israeli Prime Minister Begin, who successfully urged the assembled guests to get out and sell the message. One of the participants, Claire Sterling, spelled it out in her best-selling book 'The Terror Network'. Its themes, expounded at the conference without deviation, were presented in a booklet issued by the conference itself, entitled 'International Terrorism: The Soviet Connection', with chapters by Crozier, Moss, Jack Kemp, Major General George Keegan, Jr., Henry Jackson, and Richard Pipes. It is interesting to note that although the conference was held in Israel and was supposedly of international interest, four of the papers were written by Americans, the other two by an Australian and an Englishman famous for their long service as CIA assets. All six were notable exponents of hard-line views and strategies [6] and fall into the right-wing category of positions on the opinion-policy spectrum.

The 1984 conference succeeded in assembling a similarly large and prestigious group of participants and audience. Leading addresses were given by U.S. Secretary of State George Shultz, UN Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick, and Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin. Also in attendance were Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Midge Decter, Paul Laxalt, Edwin Meese, Jack Kemp, and media stars Daniel Schorr and Ted Koppel. As in 1979, the conference featured terrorism as the new focus of Israeli, U.S., and European foreign policy concern, and the participants chosen assured the uncontested reiteration of the Western model, with a strong bent toward its extremist version. The Palestinians, with their alleged Soviet "sponsors," were held responsible for almost every (retail) terrorist attack cited by the body of experts in attendance, who, among others, included Michael Ledeen, Claire Sterling, Ray Cline, Arnaud de Borchgrave, Lord Chalfont, and Jillian Becker.

The institute also effectively publicized its espoused doctrine of "preemptive retaliation," the Israeli policy of killing those designated as terrorists before they can act. To the delight of institute sponsors, U.S. Secretary of State George Shultz pushed this line at the conference and earlier in appearances before the Denton committee. The 1984 conference also produced a widely reviewed book edited by Netanyahu, 'Terrorism: How the West Can Win', and established Netanyahu as a leading international voice in the war against terrorism.[7]

Notes

  • ^ In pursuing his M.A. thesis, which focused on the institute, Philip Paull found that there was no published information on its officers or board. Written inquiries elicited responses that contained some names, but admittedly not all. See Paull, "International Terrorism;' p. 58.
  • ^ Ibid., p. 32.
  • ^ 3. Quoted in ibid., p. 33.
  • ^ 4. Annie Kriegel, a French journalist of the extreme right, formerly a super-Stalinist on the left, became a Free World notable upon her reversal of extremism. Her 1982 book, Israel: est-il coupable? claims that the Sabra-Shatila murders were organized by the KGB to discredit Israel. Jacques Soustelle betrayed his army oath in favor of counter-revolutionary support for the OAS in Algeria. Condemned for treason, he was eventually pardoned, and assumed his position as a spokesman for Free World principles.
  • ^ 5. A list of participants is given in Paull, "International Terrorism;' pp. 103-7.
  • ^ 6. Pipes and Keegan achieved some fame as members of the "B team" selected to rewrite CIA estimates concerning the Soviet threat to justify building more weapons. David Binder, "New C.I.A. Estimate Finds Soviet Seeks Superiority in Arms;' New York Times, Dec. 26, 1976.
  • ^ 7. On Netanyahu's definition of terrorism, and misrepresentations of fact, see chapter 3, p. 50, and chapter 8, p. 203.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
gretavo's picture

rough translation of voltairnet excerpt

Another Israeli daily newspaper, Maariv, had reported in its edition of April 17, 2008 that Benjamin Netanyahu, then leader of Likoud, affirmed during a conference at the university Bar Ilan that the attacks of September 11 had been beneficial for Israel.

“We benefit from one thing, that is the attacks against the Twin towers and the Pentagon, and the American attack against Iraq”, he declared according to Maariv. These events “galvanized American public opinion in our favour”

Professor Ben-Tzion Netanyahu was the personal secretary of Ze'ev Jabotinsky, the father of the Revisionist Zionism. In years 1980-90, he founded with his son Benjamin and George H. Bush (the father), the Jonathan Institute (named after his oldest son Jonathan Netanyahu, who died in combat) and worked out the media concept of “international terrorism” [1]

In January 2001, the treasurer of the Jonathan Institute and of the electoral campaigns of Netanyahu, property developer Larry Silverstein, acquired the World Trade Center of New York. He took out an insurance policy which he wrote himself envisaging the allowances for each attack which could damage the WTC. After September 11, he claimed - beyond frankness a double compensation with the reason that there had been two distinct attacks committed with two different planes. At the conclusion of several lawsuits, it reached 4,5 billion dollars, carrying out a clear appreciation of 1 billion dollar.

===

[1] Appalling Imposture 2, Manipulation and misinformation, by Thierry Meyssan (Jean-Paul Bertrand ED., 2007, chapter “the invention of “Islamic terrorism””.

richard's picture

9/11 Israeli soldiers guard Netanyahu's Jonathan Institute

Thanks for this post, RT.

While researching this possible connection between Lucky Larry, Netanyahoo, and the Jonathan Institute, I recognised from some research I did a while back the address of the American Friends of the Jonathan Institute in New York.

You will recall the foreign-sounding soldier on 9/11 with apparent foreknowledge of the collapse of (what could only be) WTC7: "Building's going to collapse. Nothing informations."

He's stood directly in front of 277 Broadway.

The address of American Friends of the Jonathan Institute is:

AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE JONATHAN INSTITUTE
277 BROADWAY STE 801
NEW YORK, NY
10007-2023

 

I posted in more detail over at TheInfoUnderground forum: 9/11 Israeli soldiers guard Netanyahu's Jonathan Institute.