How 9-11 truth will play out - revised
Due to further study of 9-11 truth and more current info, I am adjusting my make believe scenario for how 9-11 truth will play out (the original version is in 911B).
This is a fictional account of what can happen in the future. This assumes the year is 2007 forward.
1. 9-11 truth is spreading too far for the conspiracists to contain. 9-11 was convenient when it was first executed, citizen rights were curtailed, media was controlled, occupation troops were deployed in Afghanistan and Iraq. At present however, 9-11 is becoming a liability. A big concern is that 9-11 truth, if pursued to its true benefactors would expose the ZIONISTS that control US media and government policies (both overt and covert actions), exposure of the ZIONISTS control and influence in government and media is considered unacceptable at any cost.
2. The ZIONISTS determine that the Republican party cannot win the 2008 elections due to the Iraq war debacle. This is sad for them. The Republicans were real go getters. 9-11 after all was executed under their watch.
3. The ZIONISTS determine that the other party under their control, the Democrats will have to run things for a while. The Democrats are considered the slow driver to accomplish the ZIONISTS objectives, the Republicans are like a race driver in comparison. In either case, both parties actually compete to get the blessings of the ZIONISTS to take the steering wheels of the US Govt.
4. Democrats receive funding and support from the ZIONISTS in order to win the next elections. Everything is fair game for the campaigns, Iraq War, WMD lies, Katrina disaster, everything except for real 9-11 truth (9-11 LIHOP is OK).
5. Democrats with the support of the left leaning journalists win the next elections. Left gatekeepers assume a high profile as champions of the Democratic party while keeping a lid on real 9-11 truth.
6. The Democrats, having campaigned for Iraq War withdrawal, will pull the troops back from Iraq. If possible, the new administration will strive to maintain the agreements for developing and controlling Iraq oil, this is after all the objective of the war and 9-11, except that the neocons botched the job so badly. Actual conditions on the ground in Iraq will determine whether those unfair agreements will be honored.
7. Elation in the victory by the Democrats will give cover for the conspiracists to hide themselves and prevent further scrutiny. Further investigations of 9-11 will be directed at convenient scapegoats such as the fumbling Pres. Bush, CIA, FBI, consorting Pakistanis will be blamed solely for the conspiracry and perhaps punished severely (the full LIHOP mania). They did not stop AlQuaeda, what nincompoops, to the gallows with them! (What about the ZIONISTS who control the media and could have been the only ones to impose the 9-11 truth blackout? What Zio..., what are you talking about?)
8. The 9-11 truth movement, having lost its relevance in the eyes of the public will dissolve.
9. 9-11 truthers who are too incorigible to be taken in by the farce are dealt with silently.
10. The conspirators plan their next action, another season of 24, more news about Paris Hilton (another third world country could be engulfed in a new war but we wouldn't know)
--------------------------------------------
A Filipino for 9-11 truth
http://911blogger.com/node/8914
so i guess we don't need
war with iran after all?
good point
Hi Kate.
Sorry I left that out. I know the Zionists in Israel have been openly taunting for a war with Iran and the current US administration wants it too if it can get away with it. I think the setbacks in Iraq as well as the nascent awakening of truthers is tying the neocons hands a bit. Another false flag op is the likely scenario before bombs start to fall on Iran.
I also left out the recent bombings in the UK, which may be the prelude to the next major false flag op.
If you have your own scenario and have no objection to making it public, please share it as well.
By looking into the future, perhaps we can change it. I am hoping that since truthers have been ranting about nukes being used as the next false flag scenario, the Zionists and neocons would be turned off from using it.
Draft scenario with Iran
Draft scenario with Iran
1. 9-11 truth is spreading too far for the conspiracists to contain. 9-11 was convenient when it was first executed, citizen rights were curtailed, media was controlled, occupation troops were deployed in Afghanistan and Iraq. At present however, 9-11 is becoming a liability. A big concern is that 9-11 truth, if pursued to its true benefactors would expose the Zionists that control US media and government policies (both overt and covert actions), exposure of the Zionists control and influence in government and media is considered unacceptable at any cost.
2. To bolster the old terrorists-r-after-us story line, the conspiracists set off explosions in several countries outside the US (makes me think of UK, Spain, Indonesia, and the Philippines). These acts keep the US population scared and supportive of the US Gov't war on terror.
3. The Zionists determine that the Republican party cannot win the 2008 elections due to the Iraq war debacle. This is sad for them. The Republicans were real go getters. 9-11 after all was executed under their watch. They still want to do Iran, but they bide their time. Can't do Iran under the Republicans, it would be too messy and obvious now.
4. The Zionists determine that the other party under their control, the Democrats will have to run things for a while. The Democrats are considered the slow driver to accomplish the ZIONISTS objectives, the Republicans are like a race driver in comparison. In either case, both parties actually compete to get the blessings of the ZIONISTS to take the steering wheels of the US Govt.
5. Democrats receive funding and support from the Zionists in order to win the next elections. Everything is fair game for the campaigns, Iraq War, WMD lies, Katrina disaster, everything except for real 9-11 truth (9-11 LIHOP is OK).
6. Democrats with the support of the left leaning journalists win the next elections. Left gatekeepers assume a high profile as champions of the Democratic party while keeping a lid on real 9-11 truth. The conspirators get their people elected without even activating the secret programs in the Deibold voting machines.
7. Elation in the victory by the Democrats will give cover for the conspiracists to hide themselves and prevent further scrutiny. Further investigations of 9-11 will be directed at convenient scapegoats such as the fumbling Pres. Bush, CIA, FBI, and the consorting Pakistanis. They will be blamed solely for the conspiracry and perhaps punished severely (the full LIHOP mania). There is no scrutiny of the ZIONISTS who control the media and could have been the only ones with the means and motive to impose the 9-11 truth blackout.
8. The 9-11 truth movement, having lost its relevance in the eyes of the public will mostly dissolve.
9. With everybody thinking the neocon nightmare is over, the 9-11 conspirators spring their next move, a major explosion in a US city causing massive civilian casualties. This false flag op is blamed on a nexus of Al Quaeda terrorists and alleged nuclear weapons from Iran.
10. The US goes under martial law. Truthers who still don't toe the line are picked up and never seen again.
11. The US does not take long to retaliate to the "terrorist" attack, in a matter of days, the US launches a major bombing campaign in Iran. The targets are ostensibly the nuclear facilites from which the terrorist weapon came from. Along with the nuclear facilities, major infrastructure such as water supply, energy, communications and other civilian facilities are destroyed. Iran is neutralized as a potential threat to Israel. As in Iraq, massive civilian casualties are a consequence of the air campaign.
My crystal ball cracked after number 11. I cant picture how the world would look like after a war with Iran. Will China and Russia come to Iran's aid? Would this lead to WW3?
The Iraq mess seems to indicate that the Zionists and neocons can set off unintended consequences beyond their control. I hope they figure out that a war with Iran is a lose-lose proposition.
crystalline
vision, juandelacruz. I have been thinking along these sad and frightening scenario lines, also. what do you think will happen to the zionazi shadow government that has existed thus far after the dems take charge? would it depend on the president and his/her particular regime/admin? would someone like Gravel clean house? still does not solve the MSM. what about detention-center Chertoff? how do we get rid of him before he gets rid of us? we have to enlist jewish folk in the movement who are true American patriots. it is so infested and entrenched, for years now. Have you read DRG Christian Faith and the Truth Behind 9/11? We need to work together and we need to have hope.
After seeing Sicko last night, and also having viewed MM's response when questioned about 9/11...we really need for him to do another film/docu dealing with this heinous crime.
perhaps when you have time, you could lay out another more "optimistic - we have a chance if" version of your list, you know, options, paths not taken that could be taken.
i don't worry about martial law
i think that's just a fearmongering tactic to discourage people from truthing, nor do I think that at this point anyone thinks that enough people will buy another false flag attack. the perps are screwed--if they were willing to bet the farm with another 9/11 they would have. people just ain't that dumb and the fact that they are still trying to shut us up means they don't think anything more aggressive is advisable. it's a losing proposition for them either way, which is why I say WE can lose only by choosing not to win. i strongly recommend anyone who is generally anxious about stuff to just cut all Alex Jones out of your info-diet. :)
Hi Kate and RT, I do agree
Hi Kate and RT,
I do agree that there is less probability for the Iran/martial law scenario the more truthers there are. Perhaps the critical mass of truthers has been reached to make it impossible to mount the next false flag operation.
It would be wrong to assume however that the Zionists are a static force that does not adjust to their environment, which includes the growing presence of truthers.
This post from 911B shows how much the Zionists want to get into Iran.
http://911blogger.com/node/9845#comment
Not mentioned was how much the Democrats, not just Republican front runners wanted to pander to the Zionists that they would take a hard line on Iran.
As it stands, it is almost sure that a pro Zionist president will be elected next year.
I think the Zionists would react to the presence of truthers by planning the next justification for war to be both compelling and undebunkable. The best way to do that would be to provoke Iran to act against the US in such a way that the US can publicly justify to retaliate. The US has in fact been tightening the economic noose on Iran. What finally breaks the camels back may be a Zionist op that forces the Iranian and US hand. Just like Gulf of Tonkin, the provocation or false flag can take place in the water or some other place where there are no press people who can cover any mistakes in the execution. Maybe the sinking of an aircraft carrier (pure speculation on my part).
I think RT is right that martial law may not be forthcoming. They would only go there if they really needed to and can get away with it. Right now it seems martial law will incite open opposition rather than provide them with the means to get things done. I do think they earlier thought they could and would impose martial law, which is why the laws have already been changed allowing its arbitrary imposition. If they wanted or needed to impose martial law, I think they would resort to alleged Iranian terrorists having penetrated US society and blowing things up randomly. But then again, I don't think they really need a martial law in the US, all they want is to set back Iran and eliminate it as a regional opposition to Israel.
They probably didn't count on the truthers growing in numbers though and now they would realize they do not have the civil and milirary strength to impose it on the US public even if they wanted to.
RT is also right that it is upto truthers whether the Zionists can get their way or be brought to justice. Hopefully, us in other countries can contribute as well.
Kate, regarding your request for a happier scenario:
I think one of these days, the parents of military and police personnel will be convinced that 9-11 truthers have been right all along rather than wingnuts. When they tell their sons and daughters in uniform to stop supporting the POTUS wars we will see the Neocons and Zionists running to Israel (where I don't think they will be welcomed by good people) and secret hideaways in South America.
false flag
as of today, reading, on this site, the post and watching the FOX videos of supposed UFOs, i am a little more leary of an upcoming false flag of larger magnitude. and, of course, detention centers have been springing up everywhere...geez
mostly agree
except that we will not pull out of Iraq entirely, we will keep bases a la Saudi Arabia, both to serve corporate interests (protect oil), control whoever they are there protecting (puppet du jour), and perhaps most importantly to help foment genuine Islamist resentment and/or attacks (the latter can always be faked...)
I'm reading James Ennes' book about the USS Liberty (Assault on the Liberty) right now--it's really hard to read with all its graphic details of the horror that unfolded.
Personally, I think I am going to start treating USS Liberty Truth and 9/11 Truth as one and the same cause. You could probably throw in JFK Truth in there too as far as I'm concerned. I'm fairly disgusted right now.
I agree that the neocons and
I agree that the neocons and zionists want to keep the bases in Iraq.
I think the bases in the northern Kurdish areas can likely be kept by the US. The US embassy and other bases in Baghdad and the Sunni areas seem to be dependent on vulnerable supply lines from Kuwait. Maintaining them long term is a big question mark for me although the US has invested so much and will likely fight bitterly to maintain them. The surrounding population seems hell bent against the US however.
The southern, Shiite areas seem to be under the control of Iraqis who I think can and will eventually kick out the remaining coalition bases on their turf.
(I'm no expert, just staring at my fuzzy crystal ball)
Your reading material at present
sounds a lot like mine right now -- stuff that just makes your eyeballs explode out of your head in horror and disgust. While I’m working on the second part of my little writing project, there are some documents and letters that I will just have to post here so you can see some of the things I am looking at. Unbelievable. Sometimes after eight hours of research, I feel like a homocide detective getting off duty.
I started off my morning the other day reading a letter the Jewish Rescue Committee in Czechoslovakia received from the Zionist "Jewish" Agency Executive Officers in Switzerland. This letter was in reply to the call of the Czech Jewish Rescue Committee for financial help to buy the freedom of the Jews in Eastern Europe. Headquarters basically told the Czech leaders to take some funds, escape to Palestine with the rest of the leadership, and let the Jews of Eastern Europe die in the camps. The folks at Zionist HQ in Switzerland then explain in this letter that these “human sacrifices†would become useful later on down the road during the land division aftermath of WWII. They will be remembered as symbolic martyrs who died in the camps so that Israel might live by affording its post-war advocates an advantageous seat at the bargaining table with just enough guilt power to swing a deal for the creation of Israel.
Yes, amidst the long string of Israeli attacks against the U.S., the U.S.S. Liberty was brutal. How many hours did it go on for?
from 911 blogger, a warning
EDIT: This warning's signatories turned out to be contested. At least one of them claims not to have signed the statement (details at http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2123 )
------------
from 911 blogger, a warning of an impending 9-11 type false flag attack coming from some well known activists including a former Congresswoman.
http://www.911blogger.com/node/10905#comment
THE KENNEBUNKPORT WARNING
To the American people, and to peace loving individuals everywhere:
Massive evidence has come to our attention which shows that the backers, controllers, and allies of Vice President Dick Cheney are determined to orchestrate and manufacture a new 9/11 terror incident, and/or a new Gulf of Tonkin war provocation over the coming weeks and months. Such events would be used by the Bush administration as a pretext for launching an aggressive war against Iran, quite possibly with nuclear weapons, and for imposing a regime of martial law here in the United States. We call on the House of Representatives to proceed immediately to the impeachment of Cheney, as an urgent measure for avoiding a wider and more catastrophic war. Once impeachment has begun, it will be easier for loyal and patriotic military officers to refuse illegal orders coming from the Cheney faction. We solemnly warn the people of the world that any terrorist attack with weapons of mass destruction taking place inside the United States or elsewhere in the immediate future must be considered the prima facie responsibility of the Cheney faction. We urge responsible political leaders everywhere to begin at once to inoculate the public opinion of their countries against such a threatened false flag terror operation.
(Signed) A Group of US Opposition Political Leaders Gathered in Protest at the Bush Compound in Kennebunkport, Maine, August 24-25, 2007
CYNTHIA MCKINNEY, FORMER US CONGRESSWOMAN, GEORGIA
CINDY SHEEHAN, CANDIDATE FOR US CONGRESS, CALIFORNIA
CRAIG HILL, CANDIDATE FOR US CONGRESS, VERMONT GREEN PARTY
BRUCE MARSHALL, CONVENOR, PHILADELPHIA PLATFORM
JAMILLA EL-SHAFEI, KENNEBUNK PEACE DEPARTMENT
WEBSTER G. TARPLEY, AUTHOR
ANN WRIGHT, COLONEL US ARMY RESERVE, FORMER US DIPLOMAT
DR. DAHLIA WASFI, WWW.LIBERATETHIS.COM
GEORGE PAZ MARTIN
JOHN KAMINSKI, LAWYER, IMPEACHMENT ACTIVIST
the phrase "Massive evidence"
i don't know, just seemed a little unprofessional for this group of alleged signatories. I can think of several words to replace "massive" that would have (in my mind anyway) given this a lot more credibility. Substantial, overwhelming, significant, concrete, but "massive"? What, did they reassemble the steel from one of the towers? Now that I could justifiably consider massive.
Just revisiting my old
Just revisiting my old predictions, I think I got 7 out of 10 correct.
I'm happy to be mistaken about the truth movement getting weaker after the elections, it seems much stronger today compared to 2007 and getting stronger by the day.