Exhibit B
Evidence of explosives in the twin towers
IF BUILDING 7 WAS DELIBERATELY DEMOLISHED, WHAT ABOUT THE TWIN TOWERS?
Let's face it--it is obvious at first sight to most people that Building 7 was indeed demolished in the traditional way--with explosives, on 9/11/01. Not only that, but there is overwhelming evidence proving that the twin towers, WTC 1 and 2, were also destroyed with explosives that were pre-positioned in the buildings before the planes hit them.
Among the evidence is the way the towers were built--they could not have collapsed in the manner observed without the help of strategically placed demolition charges. Multiple WTC employees to this day report encountering explosions on several different floors including in the basement (before the first plane crashed), and molten iron from the exploded support columns was found in the rubble piles of all three buildings. A huge explosion seems to have gone off inside the North Tower precisely when the South Tower was hit by a plane.
It seems the idea was to "hide" the stronger demolition charges in the North Tower behind the explosive spectacle of the second plane crashing.
Steel melts at 2800 degrees Fahrenheit, but jet fuel burns at a maximum of 1800 degrees under ideal conditions--far from what existed in the mostly fireproofed towers.
First, look at this picture taken during the construction of the towers, noting in particular the intricate structure of massive steel columns that made up the central core of the buildings:
Now look at these excerpts from Don Paul and Jim Hoffman's book Waking Up From Our Nightmare showing how FEMA, the BBC, and NOVA all lied about the twin towers' construction-why the deception?
While the official explanation is that the jet fuel fires weakened the steel, causing the floors to collapse like a stack of pancakes, the presence of the 47 core columns makes that impossible. For the towers to collapse the way they did, all 47 columns would have to have been cut, and neither the planes crashing nor the fires burning, OR the floors "pancaking" could have caused that to happen.
Only the use of explosives can account for the straight down, fast collapses observed. Watch the towers collapsing and notice the "squibs", or plumes of debris ejected at high speed well below the demolition line--these are also telltale signs of demolition charges going off inside the buildings:
Steven Jones, a retired professor of physics at Brigham Young University has written a detailed and thoroughly researched paper analysing every aspect of the towers' collapse concluding that a variant of an incendiary called thermite in conjunction with conventional military grade explosives must have been used to break apart the towers' massive core structures.
Thermite is a simple mix of aluminum and iron oxide powder that reacts violently when lit on fire, producing a combination of intense heat in the form of molten iron and aluminum oxide (a white smoke) as a byproduct. Based on studies of a metal sample from the destroyed towers the variant Jones suspects was used is called thermate--it includes sulfur to make it burn hotter, and the sulfidation left on the samples is consistent with its use.
As a matter of fact, FEMA's own report includes an appendix that discusses the same effects found on steel from building 7--oxidation and sulfidation on areas of the metal that were melted through. Though FEMA recommended more study of this effect, no one other than Prof. Jones seems to have done such a study.
Here's a video of steel melting and dripping out of the south tower just before it falls:
Notice the similarity of what's happening in that video with the following video of thermite in action:
And see members of the Fire Department of New York discussing finding red hot patches in the rubble piles SIX WEEKS after 9/11. How did it get so hot, and stay so hot for so long? Definitely not from jet fuel fires.