Pre-planted explosives, pre-planted witnesses, pre-planted experts, pre-planted myths

Keenan's picture

Profile of a Pre-planted expert: Jerome Hauer

Once people become somewhat conversant with the evidence surrounding the actual mechanics of the 9/11 Psy-op and the many methods of embellishing that lie employed by the perps on so many different levels, it becomes obvious that as much effort went into the planning and propagating of the propaganda and "Public Myths" aspect as went into the operation itself. We see that right from the outset, within minutes of the beginning of the unfolding of tragic events on the morning of 9/11, people appearing with ready-made stories to tell and specific technical knowledge of the "fire-induced structural failure" of the WTC towers, or intimate knowledge of the designated perpetrators Osama bin Laden and his cave-dwelling Al Quesadilla Terrorist Network and how they pulled it off, etc., when such specific knowledge could not possibly have been known so early in the game without it being pre-scriptied ahead of time. Jerome Hauer was one of those pre-planted experts employed to help steer the public towards the official myths that morning, appearing on multiple national television networks.

Check out this collection of video clips regarding these pre-planting of myths via the media on 9/11. Jerome Hauer's interview by Dan Rather starts at 2:27

So, Jerome Hauer (former head of NY Office of Emergency Management) appeared in the CBS studio that morning within a couple of hours of the beginning of the attacks and already had this elaborate story to tell, both about how the WTC towers "collapsed", and about Bin Laden and his merry band of hijackers able to outsmart the world's most sophisticated air defense, etc., and then suddenly changed the topic to emotional-laden things such as the impact on rescue workers, blah, blah, blah.

The Method:

-Sell the lie with authority
-Then change the subject to something emotional

Rather asks him if pre-positioned explosives could have been used to bring down the Twin Towers and Hauer immediately discounts the possibility, saying: "My sense is that just the velocity of the plane and the fact that you have a plane filled with fuel hitting that building that burned, that the velocity of the plane certainly had an impact on the structure itself. And then the fact that it burned and you had that intense heat probably weakened the structure as well. And I think it was simply the planes hitting the buildings and causing the collapse.” Why was Hauer so sure the plane crashes and subsequent fires alone caused the collapses? In fact, when he testifies before the 9/11 Commission in 2004, he will be asked whether Office of Emergency Management had, before 9/11, conducted “any planning for what would be the response if a commercial or a private plane were to accidentally [hit] either the World Trade Center or some other building in New York City?” He will reply: “We had aircraft crash drills on a regular basis. The general consensus in the city was that a plane hitting a building… was that it would be a high-rise fire”. Yet he will not say that the building collapsing had been considered a possibility.

Jerome Hauer is a very interesting fellow.

A crucial aspect of control that needed to be established in order to pull off 9/11 was to gain control of security of the WTC complex. This way, Mossad explosive experts -- who just so happened to be in town just prior to and on 9/11 -- could be readily allowed access to strategic areas of the buildings in order to prep for the demolitions, for example. The contract to run security at the WTC was given to Kroll, Inc. after the 1993 wtc bombing. Kroll is otherwise known as "Wallstreets CIA". The New York Port Authority (Chaired by Zionist Lewis Eisenberg) paid them $2.5 million to "revamp" security at the complex. The owners of Kroll were two Zionist Jews named Jules & Jeremy Kroll. The managing director of Kroll at the time was Zionist Jerome M. Hauer. I wonder why Kevin Ryan never explored these interesting connections when he wrote his big paper "Demolition Accesss to the WTC Towers"?

Hauer was also the guy chosen to run Mayor Rudy Guiliani's office of emergency management ( OEM) from 1996 to 2000. He is the key individual that pushed for this office to be placed in Silverstein's building 7. Jerome Hauer is also a staunch Zionist. Hauer's mother, Rose Muscatine Hauer, is the retired Dean of the Beth Israel School of Nursing and the Honorary President of the New York Chapter of Hadassah, the Daughters of Zion movement that is one of the central Zionist organizations involved in the creation and maintenance of the State of Israel.

A hardly known fact is that Jerome Hauer is the one who advised the White House to go on Cipro - the anti-biotic effective against Anthrax - a week prior to the mailings. How did he know a week ahead of time that there would be an Anthrax attack? How COULD he have known?

Hauer is an 'expert' in Bio-Terrorism and was the one who was in charge of the NIH response to the anthrax attacks. His reactions to the anthrax mailings were strange (a little too slow) and he took the opportunity to invoke "Osama Bin Laden" in his rhetoric at every opportunity.

Hauer was also the one who hired former special FBI agent John O'Neill as head of security at the WTC, and had him start his job on 9/11, coincidentally. EDIT: It turns out this is inaccurate. John O'Neill actually took up his new position on August 23rd, 2001, not on 9/11. John O'Neill, who was tasked with investigating Bin Laden for the Bush Administration and quit in frustration at the behavior of his superiors, was tragically and, again, coincidentally killed on his FIRST day on the job in the 9/11 attack.

If we all agree that there were

Pre-planted explosives,
pre-planted witnesses,
pre-planted experts,
pre-planted myths

then that begs the question: why wouldn't there be

pre-planted fake 9/11 truth advocates, out there from the beginning tasked with steering people within the truth movement towards official myths?

Mike Ruppert, John Judge, Daniel Hopsicker, Alex (it's the nebulous NWO, not the Zionists!) Jones, John Albanese are a few that come to mind...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Keenan's picture

How to catch the perpetrators of 9/11

It seems to me that it really isn't that hard to figure out what the shortest path to finding the 9/11 perpetrators might be. Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't it make the most sense to start with those who are most obviously connected in some way to the perpetrators?

Instead of starting our investigation where Jon Gold and other obvious fakes say we should start - far, far away in those wild goose chases to little towns with such names as Jihadiville in Patsystan - why not start at the scene of the crime, in New York City, at the World Trade Center site, for example? Or in the Controlled Media studios in New York City? Who were the people we can identify who are, at a minimum, people of interest?

1) These pre-planted witnesses and experts who pushed these pre-scripted sets of myths through the media. A real investigation would look into these people - Harley Guy, Jerome Hauer, and those other plants - to find out who they were working for.

2) Those who Secured Control of World Trade Center Complex prior to 9/11, such as

•Larry Silverstein obtained a 99 year lease on the entire world trade center complex on 24 July, 2001. I think we're all pretty familiar with Larry Silverstein's interesting connections and history.
•Frank Lowy leased the shopping concourse area called the Mall at the World Trade Center, made up of approximately 427,000 square feet of retail floor space. Frank Lowy has quite an interesting history. He was a member of the Golani Brigade, and fought in the Israeli war of independence. Before this he was a member of Hagganah, a Jewish terrorist organization. That is only the tip of the iceberg of this guy's interesting connections/history
•Lewis Eisenberg was head of the Port Authority of New York and authorized the lease transfer to his Zionist brethren Larry and Lowy. Eisenberg was a large contributor to the Bush-Cheney presidential campaign, as well as a partner in the Zionist-controlled bank Goldman-Sachs. There's much more to this guy as well regarding involvement with pro-Israeli government pressure group in the U.S.
•Ronald Lauder Billionaire, was the chairman of NY Governor George Pataki’s commission on privatization. He is the key individual who lobbied for the privatization of the WTC but he also got the former Stewart Air Force Base to become privatized. Oddly, the flight paths of flight 175 and flight 11 converged directly over this airport. Active in Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, Jewish National Fund, World Jewish Congress, American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee, Anti-Defamation League, Jewish Theological Seminary. President of the World Jewish Congress, founded a school for the Mossad in Herzliya, Israel called the Lauder School of Government Diplomacy and Strategy. Need I say more?

3) Those who controlled and advised security at the WTC
•Kroll Associates Inc
•Jerome Hauer
•Securacom who ran security at the WTC "up to the day the buildings fell"

4) Those who had contracts to "upgrade the cabling" at the WTC Twin Towers just before 9/11
•E-J Electric Installation Co. won a $28 million contract to tighten security at the World Trade Center and installed 2 million feet of fiber-optic cable before 9/11

These are just some of the people I would start with if I was trying to decide what the "shortest path to 9/11 truth" might be. Does this not make way more sense than Jon Gold's logic? Am I missing something?

Annoymouse's picture

great assessment

Only thing missing is perhaps those in a position to commit the Pentagon fraud(start with Zakheim-he ties in with remote flight in addition to likely choosing the blast point in the Pentagon,the 2.3 trillion,PNAC,Israel etc.).

But yes, this is infinitely more logical than the Jon Gold approach of pinning 9/11 on Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. Oh yeah, and Cheney/Bush/Rummy too!

Keenan's picture

5) Those who moved clients out of the WTC 1 week before 9/11

That would be Urban Moving Systems, a known Mossad front, who apparently moved Zim American Israeli Shipping Company out of the WTC in the week prior to 9/11 (and moved explosives in to the WTC at the same time?). Hmmmm....

Keenan's picture

CORRECTION: Securacom Was NOT Running WTC Security on 9/11

Upon further research by yours truly, I have discovered that my statement above that Securacom "ran security at the WTC 'up to the day the buildings fell'" is false. It turns out that Securacom was only responsible for a specific contract to install some electronic security equipment.

The NY Port Authority and Kroll Associates were responsible for handling the actual day-to-day security at the WTC. Please see my recent blog article about it: Kevin Ryan Writes Another Limited Hangout Piece Regarding WTC Security, Limits Scrutiny to Bush/Bin Laden

When I made that assertion above, I was simply repeating the oft repeated claim that has been made for the last 7 years by the 9/11 Truth Movement. The original source of that claim was from words taken out of context from an interview with Securacom/Stratesec CEO Barry McDaniel quoted in a February 4, 2003 article by the Prince George's Journal (Maryland), in which McDaniel was referring to a "completion contract" on electronic equipment that they were working on "up to the day the buildings fell down." They were apparently contracted to work on a very small part of a larger contract that E-J Electric Installation Co. won - a $28 million contract to upgrade electronic security at the World Trade Center.

Contracting to install some specific components for an electronic security system is very different from "running security" or "handling security". The truth movement appears to have largely been misconstruing the role of Securacom/Stratesec in regards to WTC security for at least 7 years and needs to correct this mistake, imo.

kate of the kiosk's picture


this was covered by LT in this post

Keenan's picture

Thanks for that link, I had

Thanks for that link, I had forgotten about that very excellent piece by Lazlo - one of the best writers ever to have contributed to WTCD, imo.

Annoymouse's picture

Why are good commenters being banned here?

Just wondering..I'm reading well-informed comments and in the upper right we're notified that
"this user has been banned" Why?

gretavo's picture

there's a reason for each one...

The reasons vary but most bannings have been due to the individual posting links to inappropriate material after being warned against it. This has included linking to racist websites or harping on topics known to be used to make truthers look bad like "birtherism". I sincerely regret any case where I've erred on the side of caution and thereby banned someone who was not intentionally causing trouble, but I've always suggested that those banned can re-register under a different name, since most of us are ostensibly anonymous anyway.